Frigidaire EFR323 3.2 cu ft Compact Fridge, Mini vs Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star
Updated July 2026 — Frigidaire EFR323 3.2 cu ft Compact Fridge, Mini wins on capacity and width, Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star wins on noise.
The Frigidaire EFR323 offers more storage and features, while the Midea WHS-65LB1 is more budget-friendly and energy-efficient.
Why Frigidaire EFR323 3.2 cu ft Compact Fridge, Mini is better
Storage Capacity
Frigidaire has 3.2 cu. ft. vs Midea's 1.6 cu. ft.
Features
Frigidaire includes two glass shelves and a chiller compartment.
Design
Frigidaire has a modern aesthetic with a stainless steel finish.
Why Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star is better
Price
Midea is priced at $122.99 compared to Frigidaire's $158.00.
Energy Efficiency
Midea is Energy Star certified with lower energy consumption.
Noise Level
Midea operates at less than 42 dB, making it quieter.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Frigidaire EFR323 3.2 cu ft Compact Fridge, Mini | Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $158.00 | $122.99 |
| Energy Consumption | Not specified | 207 kWh/year |
| Sales Rank | 20989 | 5958 |
| Chiller Compartment | Yes | Yes |
| Reversible Door | Yes | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Design and Aesthetic
The Frigidaire EFR323 boasts a modern aesthetic that elevates any space it occupies, while the Midea WHS-65LB1 emphasizes compactness through its functional design. The Frigidaire model’s sleek stainless steel finish adds a touch of elegance, making it suitable for various settings like dorms, offices, or even kitchens. In contrast, the Midea mini fridge is designed with practicality in mind, measuring just 18.6 inches wide and 17.7 inches deep, making it ideal for tight spaces. Both refrigerators offer reversible doors, enhancing their versatility for placement in different environments.
Storage Capacity
When it comes to storage capacity, the Frigidaire EFR323 clearly outperforms the Midea WHS-65LB1. With a spacious 3.2 cu. ft. capacity, the Frigidaire can accommodate significantly more beverages and snacks compared to the Midea's 1.6 cu. ft. capacity. This difference means that if you're looking to store larger quantities, the Frigidaire would be the better choice. However, for those with minimal storage needs, the Midea’s compact size still offers practical storage solutions, including a chiller compartment for quick access to cold drinks.
Features and Functionality
The Frigidaire EFR323 includes additional features that enhance its functionality, such as two glass shelves and a 2L door basket for large bottles. Its built-in chiller compartment with an ice cube tray adds to its versatility, allowing for better organization and access to frozen items. Meanwhile, the Midea WHS-65LB1 focuses on essential features, offering easy adjustable thermostats for temperature control and a removable glass shelf for accommodating larger items. While both models have practical features, the Frigidaire provides a more comprehensive storage solution.
Energy Efficiency
Energy efficiency is a vital consideration for many consumers. The Midea WHS-65LB1 is Energy Star certified, consuming only 207 kWh per year, which can lead to lower energy bills over time. Conversely, the Frigidaire EFR323 does not specify its energy consumption, but its compressor cooling system does suggest a degree of efficiency. While the Midea model is about 22% cheaper at $122.99 compared to the Frigidaire's $158.00, its energy-saving features may appeal to budget-conscious buyers looking to minimize utility costs.
Noise Levels
In terms of operational noise, the Midea WHS-65LB1 takes the lead with a noise level of less than 42 dB, which is relatively quiet for a mini fridge. This low noise level is particularly advantageous for users who plan to place the fridge in a bedroom or office environment. While the Frigidaire EFR323 does not provide specific noise level information, its compressor cooling system typically generates more sound than models that focus on quieter operations. Thus, if silence is a priority, the Midea would likely be the better option.
Price Comparison
Pricing is a significant factor when choosing between these two refrigerators. The Frigidaire EFR323 is priced at $158.00, while the Midea WHS-65LB1 is more budget-friendly at $122.99, making it about 22% cheaper. This price difference might sway consumers who are looking for a quality mini fridge without breaking the bank. However, the additional features and larger capacity of the Frigidaire may justify its higher price for some buyers, depending on their specific needs.
Sales Rank and Popularity
The Midea WHS-65LB1 outshines the Frigidaire EFR323 in terms of sales rank, holding a position at 5,958 compared to the Frigidaire's rank of 20,989. This distinction suggests that more consumers have opted for the Midea model, potentially due to its compact size, lower price, and energy efficiency. For buyers who prioritize popularity and proven performance, the Midea may seem like a more attractive option. However, the Frigidaire’s additional features could appeal to those seeking more from their mini fridge.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Frigidaire EFR323 and the Midea WHS-65LB1 ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you require more storage capacity and additional features, the Frigidaire may be worth the extra cost. However, for those seeking a budget-friendly, energy-efficient, and quieter option, the Midea is a strong contender. Evaluate the importance of size, features, and price to make the best choice for your situation.

