Frigidaire Retro Compact Refrigerator with vs Midea MERM17B0ASL 1.7 Cu Ft Mini Fridge, Compact
Updated July 2026 — Frigidaire Retro Compact Refrigerator with wins on weight and capacity, Midea MERM17B0ASL 1.7 Cu Ft Mini Fridge, Compact wins on height.
The Frigidaire offers more storage and features, while the Midea is more budget-friendly and energy-efficient.
Why Frigidaire Retro Compact Refrigerator with is better
Larger Capacity
Frigidaire has 3.2 cu ft vs Midea's 1.7 cu ft
Freezer Compartment
Frigidaire includes a freezer section
Built-in Features
Frigidaire has a built-in bottle opener
Why Midea MERM17B0ASL 1.7 Cu Ft Mini Fridge, Compact is better
Lower Price
Midea is $119.98 vs Frigidaire's $178.00
Energy Efficiency
Midea is Energy Star certified
Compact Design
Midea is smaller and fits tighter spaces
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Frigidaire Retro Compact Refrigerator with | Midea MERM17B0ASL 1.7 Cu Ft Mini Fridge, Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $178.00 | $119.98 |
| Energy Star | No | Yes |
| Noise Level | Not Specified | Low |
| Removable Shelves | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable Thermostat | Yes | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Design and Aesthetics
The Frigidaire Retro Compact Refrigerator boasts a unique retro design that enhances any decor, while the Midea MERM17B0ASL features a modern and minimalist style. The Frigidaire’s retro appearance is ideal for those looking to add a vintage touch to their space, measuring 18.5D x 20W x 31.5H inches. In contrast, the Midea mini fridge presents a space-saving design with a steel gray finish, perfect for a more contemporary look. The distinct styles cater to different tastes: the Frigidaire is designed for those who appreciate nostalgia, while the Midea appeals to minimalists.
Storage Capacity
When it comes to storage, the Frigidaire offers a larger capacity at 3.2 cu ft compared to the Midea's 1.7 cu ft. This means the Frigidaire is about 88% larger, making it a more suitable option for those needing extra space for beverages, snacks, and meals. The Frigidaire includes a freezer compartment for additional storage of frozen goods, while the Midea is primarily focused on efficient storage for snacks and drinks. If you require more room for your perishables, the Frigidaire is an obvious choice, whereas the Midea might suffice for lighter usage.
Energy Efficiency
The Midea MERM17B0ASL is Energy Star certified, indicating that it meets government energy efficiency standards, which can lead to lower energy costs. While the Frigidaire does not specifically mention energy certification, it does claim to have low energy consumption. Given that the Midea is priced at $119.98, it represents an energy-efficient option for budget-conscious consumers. The Midea’s efficiency can save you money over time, making it a compelling choice for users looking to minimize their utility bills.
Price Comparison
The Frigidaire is priced at $178.00, while the Midea is available for $119.98, making the Midea approximately 33% cheaper. This significant price difference can substantially influence purchasing decisions, especially for those on a budget. The lower price of the Midea may appeal to students or young professionals who need a compact fridge but are not ready to invest in a larger model. Though the Frigidaire offers additional features and capacity, the Midea's affordability cannot be overlooked.
Functionality and Features
In terms of functionality, the Frigidaire Retro Compact Refrigerator comes equipped with a built-in bottle opener, adjustable temperature controls, and removable shelves, which enhance its usability. The Midea, on the other hand, includes features like a reversible door and an adjustable/removable shelf, allowing for customization of storage space. The Frigidaire’s two-section design with a freezer compartment offers versatility for storing both frozen and fresh items, while the Midea focuses on efficient storage for everyday items. Depending on your needs, one model may offer more practical features than the other.
Target Audience
The Frigidaire is designed for users needing a larger fridge for various environments such as offices, dorms, or apartments. Its 3.2 cu ft capacity is ideal for those who want to store more items without taking up too much space. Conversely, the Midea is tailored for individuals with lighter storage needs, making it perfect for dorm rooms or small offices where space is limited. The Frigidaire’s design and features attract users looking for both style and functionality, while the Midea appeals to those prioritizing compactness and efficiency.
Noise Level
The Midea fridge is noted for its low noise operation, making it ideal for quiet environments like bedrooms or offices. The Frigidaire does not provide specific information regarding its noise levels, which could be a factor for some buyers. If noise is a critical concern for you, the Midea's emphasis on low noise could significantly enhance your experience, especially in shared living spaces.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, your choice between the Frigidaire Retro Compact Refrigerator and the Midea MERM17B0ASL largely depends on your specific needs. If you require a larger storage capacity, versatile functionality, and a stylish design, the Frigidaire is the way to go, albeit at a higher price point. However, if you are looking for a budget-friendly, energy-efficient option that excels in compactness and low noise, the Midea is an excellent choice. Evaluate your priorities in terms of space, features, and price to determine which refrigerator best fits your lifestyle.

