Frigidaire Retro Compact Refrigerator with vs Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star
Updated July 2026 — Frigidaire Retro Compact Refrigerator with wins on height and weight, Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star wins on depth.
The Frigidaire Retro Compact Refrigerator offers more capacity and a stylish design, while the Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge is more affordable and energy efficient.
Why Frigidaire Retro Compact Refrigerator with is better
Larger Capacity
Frigidaire has 3.2 cu ft vs Midea's 1.6 cu ft
Design
Frigidaire features a retro aesthetic
Freezer Compartment
Frigidaire includes a freezer section
Why Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star is better
Price
Midea is $122.99 vs Frigidaire's $178.00
Energy Efficiency
Midea is Energy Star certified
Noise Level
Midea operates at less than 42dB
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Frigidaire Retro Compact Refrigerator with | Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star |
|---|---|---|
| Cooling Range | Adjustable | 28.4°F to 35.6°F |
| Energy Consumption | Not specified | 207 kWh/year |
| Removable Shelves | Yes | Yes |
| Reversible Door | Yes | Yes |
| Noise Level | Not specified | Less than 42dB |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Frigidaire Retro Compact Refrigerator and Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge
The Frigidaire Retro Compact Refrigerator is priced at $178.00, while the Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge is notably cheaper at $122.99, making it about 31% less expensive. Both options cater to those seeking compact refrigeration solutions, ideal for dorms, offices, or small living spaces. However, their distinct features may appeal to different user needs. The Frigidaire model offers a larger capacity at 3.2 cu ft compared to the Midea's 1.6 cu ft, allowing for more storage flexibility.
Design and Aesthetics
When it comes to design, the Frigidaire Retro Compact Refrigerator boasts a vintage-inspired aesthetic that enhances any decor, making it a stylish addition to an office or dorm room. Measuring 18.5 x 20 x 31.5 inches, its rounded corners and sleek profile fit seamlessly in tight spaces. In contrast, the Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge adopts a more utilitarian approach with a modern black finish and compact dimensions of 18.6 x 17.7 x 19.4 inches. While the Midea may not have the retro flair of its competitor, its design prioritizes functionality, making it a practical option for minimalistic setups.
Capacity and Storage Options
The Frigidaire Retro Compact Refrigerator offers a substantial 3.2 cu ft of storage, making it ideal for users needing to store larger quantities of food and beverages. It features three removable shelves, a 2L bottle storage in the door, and a can dispenser, enhancing its organizational capabilities. On the other hand, the Midea WHS-65LB1 provides 1.6 cu ft of space, which may limit its storage options. However, it compensates with a reversible door and a removable glass shelf, allowing for some customization based on user preferences. The larger capacity of the Frigidaire makes it more suitable for those who require more storage flexibility.
Cooling Performance
Cooling performance is crucial in any refrigerator. The Frigidaire Retro Compact Refrigerator features an adjustable thermostat control that allows users to set their desired cooling temperatures. This model includes a freezer compartment that can hold meals and other items that need to be kept at lower temperatures. The Midea WHS-65LB1 also has an adjustable thermostat with a cooling range from 28.4°F to 35.6°F, ensuring that drinks and food are kept at optimal temperatures. Its chiller box allows for quicker cooling of beverages. Both models exhibit reliable cooling capabilities, but the Frigidaire's larger freezer compartment provides added versatility for users with diverse storage needs.
Energy Efficiency
Energy efficiency is an important consideration for any appliance. The Midea WHS-65LB1 is Energy Star certified, with an energy consumption rate of only 207 kWh/year, which may result in lower utility bills for users. The Frigidaire Retro Compact Refrigerator does not explicitly mention its energy consumption but highlights its low energy consumption design. While both models are designed to be efficient, the Midea's certification and quantifiable energy use provide a clear advantage for environmentally conscious consumers.
Noise Level
Noise levels can significantly impact user experience, especially in quiet environments like dorms or offices. The Midea WHS-65LB1 operates at less than 42dB, ensuring a quiet operation that won’t disturb your surroundings. The Frigidaire Retro Compact Refrigerator does not specify its noise level, which could be a concern for potential buyers. The Midea’s quiet functionality makes it an attractive option for users sensitive to noise, particularly in shared living spaces.
Price Comparison
The price difference between the two refrigerators is noteworthy. At $178.00, the Frigidaire Retro Compact Refrigerator is approximately 31% more expensive than the Midea WHS-65LB1, which is priced at $122.99. For budget-conscious consumers, the Midea offers substantial savings while still providing essential features for refrigeration needs. However, those willing to invest a little more may find the enhanced capacity and retro design of the Frigidaire appealing.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the Frigidaire Retro Compact Refrigerator and the Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge ultimately depends on individual needs and preferences. If you require a larger capacity with versatile storage options and appreciate vintage aesthetics, the Frigidaire is the better option. However, if affordability, energy efficiency, and quiet operation are paramount for you, the Midea is the clear choice. Each fridge has its strengths, making them suitable for different types of users.

