Frostorm 3.2 Cu Ft Mini Fridge with Freezer - Energy Efficient, Large Capacity Single Door Upright Freezer for Bedroom, Office & Dorm | Small Fridge, Reversible Door, ETL Certified(Black) vs Midea WHD-113FB1 Double Door Mini Fridge with Freezer for Bedroom Office or Dorm with Adjustable Remove Glass Shelves Compact Refrigerator, 3.1 cu ft, Black
Updated June 2026 — Frostorm 3.2 Cu Ft Mini Fridge with Freezer - Energy Efficient, Large Capacity Single Door Upright Freezer for Bedroom, Office & Dorm | Small Fridge, Reversible Door, ETL Certified(Black) wins on price and market popularity, Midea WHD-113FB1 Double Door Mini Fridge with Freezer for Bedroom Office or Dorm with Adjustable Remove Glass Shelves Compact Refrigerator, 3.1 cu ft, Black wins on freezer space and storage flexibility.
The Frostorm offers better energy efficiency, lower operating costs, and a significantly lower price, making it the superior value despite the Midea's larger freezer space and additional features.
Why Frostorm 3.2 Cu Ft Mini Fridge with Freezer - Energy Efficient, Large Capacity Single Door Upright Freezer for Bedroom, Office & Dorm | Small Fridge, Reversible Door, ETL Certified(Black) is better
Energy Efficiency
Frostorm consumes 0.6 kWh per day vs. Midea's 0.74 kWh per day, resulting in about 17% lower daily operating cost.
Price
Frostorm is priced at $166.64, $34.85 cheaper than Midea's $201.49, offering immediate savings.
Total Capacity
Frostorm has 3.2 cu ft total capacity vs. Midea's 3.1 cu ft, providing slightly more overall storage space.
Why Midea WHD-113FB1 Double Door Mini Fridge with Freezer for Bedroom Office or Dorm with Adjustable Remove Glass Shelves Compact Refrigerator, 3.1 cu ft, Black is better
Freezer Space
Midea offers 0.92 cu ft of freezer space, nearly 2.6 times more than Frostorm's 0.35 cu ft.
Interior Features
Midea includes removable glass shelves, a crisper drawer, and a 2L bottle rack, enhancing storage flexibility.
Interior Lighting
Midea features an interior LED light for better visibility in low-light conditions, unlike Frostorm which lacks this feature.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Frostorm 3.2 Cu Ft Mini Fridge with Freezer - Energy Efficient, Large Capacity Single Door Upright Freezer for Bedroom, Office & Dorm | Small Fridge, Reversible Door, ETL Certified(Black) | Midea WHD-113FB1 Double Door Mini Fridge with Freezer for Bedroom Office or Dorm with Adjustable Remove Glass Shelves Compact Refrigerator, 3.1 cu ft, Black |
|---|---|---|
| Total Capacity | 3.2 cu ft | 3.1 cu ft |
| Freezer Capacity | 0.35 cu ft (upright) | 0.92 cu ft (double door) |
| Daily Energy Consumption | 0.6 kWh | 0.74 kWh |
| Operating Cost (Daily) | $0.10 | $0.12 |
| Interior Lighting | None | LED |
| Shelf Type | Adjustable shelves, door bins | Removable glass shelves, crisper drawer |
| Door Reversibility | Yes | Yes |
| Certifications | ETL | E-Star, R600A compressor |
Dimension comparison
Capacity and Freezer Space
The Frostorm offers a larger total capacity at 3.2 cubic feet, slightly more than the Midea’s 3.1 cubic feet. However, the key difference lies in freezer space: the Frostorm provides a dedicated 0.35 cubic feet upright freezer compartment, while the Midea allocates 0.92 cubic feet across its double-door design. This means the Midea has nearly 2.6 times more freezer volume than the Frostorm. For users prioritizing frozen storage—like ice cubes or small frozen meals—the Midea delivers significantly greater utility despite its marginally smaller overall size.
Energy Efficiency and Operating Cost
The Frostorm is designed for energy savings, consuming only 0.6 kWh per day on average, with an estimated daily running cost of about $0.10. In contrast, the Midea is E-Star certified and uses just 270 kWh per year, which translates to roughly 0.74 kWh per day—slightly higher than the Frostorm. While both are efficient for their class, the Frostorm’s lower daily consumption makes it about 17% cheaper to run annually based on standard electricity rates. The Frostorm also features a mechanical thermostat with a recommended setting of “3” for optimal performance, while the Midea allows manual adjustment across a broader temperature range.
Storage Flexibility and Interior Design
The Midea stands out with removable glass shelves and a crisper drawer, offering greater adaptability for storing items like bottles, fruits, and vegetables. Its interior includes a 2L bottle rack specifically designed for milk and drinks, enhancing practicality. The Frostorm also features adjustable shelves and door bins but lacks mention of a crisper drawer or specialized bottle storage. Both models have reversible doors, allowing installation to open left or right, but the Midea adds an interior LED light for better visibility in low-light conditions—ideal for nighttime access in dorms or bedrooms.
Temperature Control and Cooling Performance
Both fridges use mechanical thermostats, but their temperature ranges differ. The Frostorm maintains the main chiller area at a recommended setting of “3,” though exact degrees aren’t specified. It cools its freezer compartment between -14°C and -24°C (-6°F to -11°F), suitable for short-term freezing. The Midea offers a wider fridge temperature range of 32°F to 50°F (1°C to 10°C) and a freezer range from -11.2°F to 5°F (-24°C to -15°C). This broader control gives the Midea more precise cooling options, particularly in the freezer zone, where it can reach colder temperatures than the Frostorm.
Build Quality and Certification
The Frostorm is ETL certified, indicating compliance with safety standards for electrical and mechanical components. It is built for durability and long-term reliability, with a manual defrost system and easy-to-clean interior. The Midea, meanwhile, is E-Star certified—a recognition of high energy efficiency—and uses an R600A high-efficiency compressor. This advanced component contributes to its lower annual energy consumption. Both units operate on standard 115V/60Hz power, but the Midea’s multi-air flow system ensures more even temperature distribution throughout the interior, potentially improving food freshness.
Price and Value Comparison
The Frostorm is priced at $166.64, making it about 17% cheaper than the Midea’s $201.49. This price difference represents a saving of $34.85 upfront. Given that the Frostorm consumes less energy daily and has a lower operating cost, this initial savings compounds over time. While the Midea offers more freezer space and additional features like LED lighting and removable shelves, the Frostorm delivers comparable core functionality at a significantly lower entry cost, making it a stronger value proposition for budget-conscious buyers.
Which should you buy?
If your priority is maximizing freezer space and having advanced interior features like LED lighting and removable shelves, the Midea WHD-113FB1 is the better choice—especially if you frequently store frozen goods or need extra organization. However, if you want a more affordable option with excellent energy efficiency, a larger total capacity, and reliable performance for everyday use, the Frostorm 3.2 Cu Ft Mini Fridge with Freezer is the smarter buy. At $166.64, it’s $34.85 cheaper than the Midea and runs on about 17% less energy daily. With a bestseller rank of 16 compared to the Midea’s 8,791, the Frostorm also enjoys stronger market validation. For most users seeking a no-frills, cost-effective mini fridge with solid performance, the Frostorm delivers superior value.