vsversusfinder

Fujifilm Fujinon XF23mmF2 R WR - Black vs Tamron 17-

Updated July 2026 — Tamron 17- leads on price and weight.

The Fujifilm XF23mmF2 R WR excels in portability and image quality, while the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 offers versatility and a broader focal range.

Why Fujifilm Fujinon XF23mmF2 R WR - Black is better

Price

Fujifilm is $100 cheaper

Weight

Fujifilm is lighter at 180g

Sharpness

Fujifilm has superior edge-to-edge sharpness

Why Tamron 17- is better

Versatility

Tamron covers a 4.1x zoom range

Video Features

Tamron has AI-enhanced autofocus for video

Durability

Tamron has moisture-resistant construction

Overall score

Fujifilm Fujinon XF23mmF2 R WR - Black
85
Tamron 17-
90

Specifications

SpecFujifilm Fujinon XF23mmF2 R WR - BlackTamron 17-
Elements10 in 6 groups16 in 12 groups
Max ApertureF2.0F2.8
Angle of View63.4°75°
Close Focus0.13m0.19m
Filter Size43mm67mm

Dimension comparison

Fujifilm Fujinon XF23mmF2 R WR - BlackTamron 17-

Overview of the Fujifilm Fujinon XF23mmF2 R WR and Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD

The Fujifilm Fujinon XF23mmF2 R WR is priced at $499.00, while the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD is priced at $599.00, making the Fujifilm about 17% cheaper. Both lenses cater to different styles and needs, which is crucial for photographers deciding between these two options. The XF23mmF2 R WR is a prime lens known for its compact design and excellent image quality, while the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 offers a versatile zoom range, making it suitable for a variety of shooting scenarios.

Design and Build Quality

The design and build quality of both lenses are tailored for different user preferences. The Fujifilm XF23mmF2 R WR is compact, lightweight, and stylish, weighing only 180 grams, which enhances its portability for street photography or casual shooting. It also boasts weather and dust resistance, allowing it to operate in temperatures as low as -10 degrees. Conversely, the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 features a robust construction with moisture-resistant elements and a fluorine coating, adding durability when shooting in challenging conditions. While the Fujifilm lens excels in portability, the Tamron lens offers enhanced durability for outdoor photography.

Optical Performance

In terms of optical performance, both lenses deliver impressive results, but they do so in different ways. The Fujifilm XF23mmF2 R WR incorporates ten elements in six groups, including two aspherical elements, which contribute to its exceptional edge-to-edge sharpness. It provides an angle of view of 63.4 degrees, making it versatile for a range of subjects. Meanwhile, the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 features 16 elements in 12 groups, including two GM (Glass Molded Aspherical) elements, ensuring outstanding optical clarity across its 4.1x zoom ratio. For photographers focused on image quality, the Fujifilm lens may have the edge in sharpness, while the Tamron excels in versatility.

Autofocus Capabilities

Autofocus is a critical feature for many photographers, and both lenses offer fast and reliable performance. The Fujifilm XF23mmF2 R WR is designed for speed, achieving focus in an astonishing 0.05 seconds when paired with compatible Fujifilm cameras. This rapid autofocus is particularly beneficial for capturing fleeting moments. The Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 also boasts effective autofocus capabilities, enhanced by AI technology for video shooting, which can result in smoother focus transitions. While both lenses offer quick autofocus, the Fujifilm lens may appeal more to action and street photographers seeking rapid response.

Focal Length and Versatility

The focal length differences between the two lenses set them apart in terms of versatility. The Fujifilm XF23mmF2 R WR has a focal length equivalent to 35mm, making it ideal for street photography, landscapes, and portraits. It encourages creativity through its fixed perspective. On the other hand, the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 spans a focal length range of 17mm to 70mm, providing a versatile zoom option that covers wide-angle to short telephoto shots. This breadth in focal length makes the Tamron lens better suited for varied shooting situations, from landscapes to close-up subjects, offering more flexibility in a single lens.

Price Comparison

The pricing of the two lenses can significantly influence purchasing decisions. The Fujifilm Fujinon XF23mmF2 R WR retails at $499.00, while the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 is priced at $599.00. This $100 difference reflects about a 17% higher cost for the Tamron lens. For photographers on a budget or those who primarily shoot with a fixed focal length, the Fujifilm lens presents a more economical option without sacrificing quality. However, for those seeking versatility and a broader range of shooting options, the additional investment in the Tamron lens may be justified.

Target Audience

The target audiences for these lenses differ based on their photographic needs. The Fujifilm XF23mmF2 R WR is perfect for photographers who prefer a lightweight, compact lens that excels in street photography and casual shooting. Its quick autofocus and sharp image quality cater well to those who prioritize portability and responsiveness. Conversely, the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 is designed for users who want a high-speed zoom lens that can adapt to various situations, including video recording. Its versatility makes it ideal for both amateur and professional photographers who require a single lens for multiple scenarios.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the Fujifilm Fujinon XF23mmF2 R WR and the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 comes down to your specific photography needs. If you value compactness, lightweight design, and exceptional image quality for street or portrait photography, the Fujifilm lens is an excellent choice at $499.00. However, if you prefer versatility and the ability to tackle a range of shooting situations, including video, the Tamron lens at $599.00 offers a broader focal range and advanced features. Ultimately, both lenses have their strengths, and the right choice depends on your individual preferences and shooting style.