vsversusfinder

Fujifilm Instax Square Link Smartphone Printer - vs Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro Portable Wireless Instant

Updated July 2026 — Fujifilm Instax Square Link Smartphone Printer - leads on battery and print size.

The Fujifilm Instax Square Link offers unique features and higher print quality, while the Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro provides a more affordable all-in-one solution.

Why Fujifilm Instax Square Link Smartphone Printer - is better

Print Quality

Fujifilm uses INSTAX SQUARE film for better image quality.

AR Features

Fujifilm includes augmented reality capabilities.

Battery Life

Fujifilm can print approximately 100 photos per charge.

Why Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro Portable Wireless Instant is better

Price

Kodak is 17% cheaper.

All-in-One

Kodak combines camera and printer in one device.

Ease of Use

Kodak has straightforward controls for instant printing.

Overall score

Fujifilm Instax Square Link Smartphone Printer -
85
Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro Portable Wireless Instant
75

Specifications

SpecFujifilm Instax Square Link Smartphone Printer -Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro Portable Wireless Instant
Price$163.95$149.99
Print MethodINSTAX SQUARE4PASS dye sublimation
Image Size2.44” x 2.44”2” x 3”
BluetoothYesYes
App FeaturesINSTAX Connect™KODAK Photo Printer

Dimension comparison

Fujifilm Instax Square Link Smartphone Printer -Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro Portable Wireless Instant

Overview of the Products

In this comparison, we pit the Fujifilm Instax Square Link Smartphone Printer against the Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro Portable Wireless Instant Camera & Photo Printer. The Fujifilm device is priced at $163.95, whereas the Kodak model is about 17% cheaper at $149.99. Both products cater to instant photography enthusiasts but offer different functionalities and user experiences.

Design and Portability

The Fujifilm Instax Square Link is small and lightweight, making it an excellent choice for those who prioritize portability. Its sleek Midnight Green color adds a modern touch, while the compact design allows it to fit easily into bags. The Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro, on the other hand, combines an instant camera and printer in a single unit. Its retro aesthetic is appealing, and its compact size means it can easily fit in your hand or pocket, making it ideal for on-the-go photography. Both devices excel in portability, but the Kodak's all-in-one functionality offers added convenience for spontaneous moments.

Printing Technology

The Fujifilm Instax Square Link uses INSTAX SQUARE instant film, which requires a separate purchase. The print size is 3.39” x 2.83” with an image size of 2.44” x 2.44”. It can print images from a smartphone via Bluetooth, utilizing the INSTAX SQUARE LINK App. In contrast, the Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro employs a genuine 4PASS dye sublimation printing method that produces smooth, detailed 2x3” prints within about 55 seconds. This technology includes a protective lamination layer that enhances the durability of photos, making them resistant to fingerprints, water, and fading. While both printers aim for quality, the Kodak's dye sublimation process may provide a more durable print.

Connectivity

The Fujifilm Instax Square Link boasts Bluetooth connectivity, allowing users to print directly from their smartphones. This feature is coupled with the INSTAX Connect™ App, which not only facilitates printing but also offers options to add text, effects, and even augmented reality features to your photos. Conversely, the Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro also features Bluetooth connectivity and links to the KODAK Photo Printer app. This app allows users to edit and customize their photos before printing. Both devices offer excellent connectivity options, but the Fujifilm's additional AR capabilities may appeal to younger users or those looking to create more engaging content.

User Experience

The Fujifilm Instax Square Link is designed with user-friendliness in mind. After downloading the INSTAX SQUARE LINK App, users can easily share images and incorporate creative elements before printing. This printer can produce approximately 100 prints per charge, making it suitable for events. The Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro, with its straightforward controls, allows for instant photography and printing without extensive setup. Users can take pictures and print them directly, appealing to those who value simplicity. Both products prioritize ease of use, but the Kodak's all-in-one design may provide a more streamlined experience for users seeking convenience.

Price Comparison

The Fujifilm Instax Square Link is priced at $163.95, while the Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro is available for $149.99, making it about 17% cheaper. For budget-conscious consumers, the lower price of the Kodak model could be a significant factor. However, the Fujifilm offers unique features such as augmented reality integration that may justify its higher price for some users. Ultimately, the choice may depend on individual preferences regarding features versus budget.

Sales Rank and Popularity

In terms of sales rank, the Fujifilm Instax Square Link holds a rank of 10,300, indicating a solid position in the market. The Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro ranks slightly lower at 22,814, which may suggest that the Fujifilm is a more popular choice among consumers. This popularity can be attributed to the Fujifilm brand's strong reputation in the instant photography space and the appealing features of the Instax Square Link. However, the Kodak model still offers valuable functionality and a unique aesthetic that may resonate with certain users.

Which should you buy?

When deciding between the Fujifilm Instax Square Link Smartphone Printer and the Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro Portable Wireless Instant Camera & Photo Printer, consider your specific needs. If you're looking for an affordable option that combines a camera and printer in one device, the Kodak Mini Shot 2 Retro at $149.99 is a compelling choice. However, if you prefer a dedicated printer that offers unique features like augmented reality capabilities and a slightly higher quality print, the Fujifilm Instax Square Link at $163.95 may be worth the investment. Ultimately, both products have their strengths, and your decision should be based on functionality, budget, and personal preference.