FUJIFILM X-T50 Mirrorless Digital Camera vs Sony Alpha a6400 Mirrorless Camera: Compact APS-C
Updated August 2026 — FUJIFILM X-T50 Mirrorless Digital Camera leads on connectivity and build quality.
The FUJIFILM X-T50 offers superior image quality and video capabilities, while the Sony Alpha a6400 is a more budget-friendly option with excellent autofocus.
Why FUJIFILM X-T50 Mirrorless Digital Camera is better
Image Quality
Higher 40.2 MP sensor
Video Capabilities
6.2K video recording
Unique Features
Dedicated Film Simulation dial
Why Sony Alpha a6400 Mirrorless Camera: Compact APS-C is better
Price
Significantly lower cost
Autofocus
More phase-detection points
Sales Performance
Higher bestseller rank
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | FUJIFILM X-T50 Mirrorless Digital Camera | Sony Alpha a6400 Mirrorless Camera: Compact APS-C |
|---|---|---|
| Megapixels | 40.2 MP | 24.2 MP |
| Video Resolution | 6.2K | 4K |
| Autofocus Points | 425 | 850 |
| Weight | 0.66 kg | 0.4 kg |
| Lens Compatibility | X Series | E Mount |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The FUJIFILM X-T50 is priced at $1,999.95, while the Sony Alpha a6400 is significantly cheaper at $835.90. This makes the Sony model about 58% less expensive than the Fujifilm camera. For those on a budget or looking for a cost-effective option without sacrificing too much quality, the Sony Alpha a6400 presents a compelling choice. However, the price difference also reflects the various features and capabilities of each camera, which are important to consider when making a decision.
Image Quality
When it comes to image quality, the FUJIFILM X-T50 boasts a formidable 40.2-megapixel X-Trans CMOS 5 HR sensor. In contrast, the Sony Alpha a6400 features a 24.2-megapixel stacked back-illuminated sensor. While the Fujifilm’s higher megapixel count suggests it may produce more detailed images, the Sony’s advanced sensor technology still delivers impressive performance, especially in low-light conditions. Both cameras offer excellent image quality, but the choice may come down to specific needs in detail and sensor performance.
Video Capabilities
The FUJIFILM X-T50 excels in video capabilities, offering 6.2K video recording at 30 frames per second, alongside 4K video at 60 frames per second. The Sony Alpha a6400 provides 4K video recording as well, but with fewer frame rate options. The FUJIFILM’s ability to shoot high-resolution video makes it a strong contender for videographers looking for versatility and quality in their footage. However, for general video use, the Sony's capabilities are still strong and should meet the needs of most casual users.
Autofocus Features
The autofocus system in the Sony Alpha a6400 is particularly noteworthy, featuring 425 phase-detection and 425 contrast-detection points, covering over 84% of the sensor. This provides fast and accurate focusing, making it suitable for dynamic shooting situations. On the other hand, the FUJIFILM X-T50 includes a modern autofocus algorithm that utilizes Deep Learning AI for subject tracking, ensuring sharp results across various subjects. Both systems are robust, but the Sony’s more extensive point coverage may provide an edge in fast-moving scenarios.
Lens Compatibility
The FUJIFILM X-T50 supports all X Series lenses and includes a 1.4x and 2x digital teleconverter, which enhances its versatility for different shooting styles and subjects. The Sony Alpha a6400 comes with a 16-50mm lens and is compatible with E Mount lenses, providing a wide range of options as well. Fujifilm’s added teleconverters may appeal to photographers looking for expanded framing options. Ultimately, the choice may depend on which brand's lens ecosystem aligns better with user preferences.
Design and Usability
The FUJIFILM X-T50 features a dedicated Film Simulation dial, offering quick access to 20 different film simulations, including the latest REALA ACE mode. Its compact design and lightweight build make it an excellent travel companion. The Sony Alpha a6400 is also designed for portability, featuring a tiltable LCD screen that is customizable for vlogging and photography. Both cameras focus on user-friendly designs, but the unique film simulation features of the Fujifilm may attract creative enthusiasts seeking a more hands-on approach to photography.
Sales Performance
In terms of sales performance, the Sony Alpha a6400 holds a bestseller rank of 5,200, demonstrating its popularity and widespread appeal among consumers. The FUJIFILM X-T50, with a sales rank of 27,916, indicates it is less popular in comparison. This discrepancy in sales rank can indicate consumer preference, with the Sony model appealing more to a wider audience, perhaps due to its lower price point and strong feature set.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the FUJIFILM X-T50 and the Sony Alpha a6400 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you prioritize high-resolution images, advanced video capabilities, and unique film simulation features, the FUJIFILM X-T50 may be the right choice for you, despite its higher price. Conversely, if you seek a more budget-friendly option with solid performance, excellent autofocus, and decent video capabilities, the Sony Alpha a6400 is an outstanding option. Consider your photography style and requirements to determine which model aligns best with your creative vision.

