Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R vs Tamron
Updated July 2026 — Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R wins on price and focal length, Tamron wins on weight and length.
The Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R excels in low-light performance and portrait capabilities, while the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 offers great value for landscape photography.
Why Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R is better
Aperture
Fujifilm has a wider maximum aperture of f/1.4.
Portraits
Fujifilm is better suited for portrait photography.
Optical Quality
Fujifilm minimizes spherical aberration effectively.
Why Tamron is better
Price
Tamron is significantly cheaper at $199.
Weight
Tamron is lighter at 7.6 ounces.
Macro Capability
Tamron offers a 1:2 maximum magnification ratio.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R | Tamron |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Fujifilm | Tamron |
| Type | Standard | Wide-Angle |
| Moisture Resistant | No | Yes |
| Aspheric Elements | 1 | 1 |
| Minimum Distance | 0.5m | 0.12m |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R is priced at $699.00, while the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2 is significantly cheaper at $199.00. This makes the Tamron lens about 71% less expensive than the Fujifilm counterpart. If budget is a primary concern, the Tamron offers substantial savings without sacrificing quality for various photography styles.
Design and Build Quality
The Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R weighs 4.1 ounces and is designed with 8 elements arranged in 6 groups, including an aspheric element. Its compact build makes it a solid choice for photographers seeking a lightweight lens. The Tamron 24mm F/2.8, on the other hand, weighs 7.6 ounces and features a compact design with a length of 2.5 inches. Both lenses are built for durability, but the Tamron's moisture-resistant construction and dirt-resistant fluorine coating make it particularly suited for outdoor use, enhancing its versatility in various shooting conditions.
Focal Length and Versatility
The Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R has a focal length of 35mm, which is equivalent to 53mm on a full-frame camera, making it ideal for standard photography. Conversely, the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 offers a wider perspective with its 24mm focal length, making it better for landscape and urban photography. The Tamron lens also boasts a maximum magnification ratio of 1:2, allowing for detailed macro-style shots, which the Fujifilm does not specifically excel at. This difference in focal length can significantly impact the types of photography each lens is best suited for.
Aperture and Low Light Performance
The Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R features a bright maximum aperture of f/1.4, making it exceptional for low-light photography and achieving beautiful bokeh in out-of-focus areas. This lens is particularly advantageous for portrait and street photography in dimly lit environments. The Tamron 24mm F/2.8, while not as wide as the Fujifilm, still offers a respectable aperture of f/2.8. However, it may not perform as well in low-light settings. The Fujifilm lens clearly has the upper hand here for those who prioritize shooting in challenging lighting conditions.
Optical Performance
Both the Fujifilm and Tamron lenses are designed to deliver high-quality images, but they approach optical performance differently. The Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 employs a glass-molded aspheric lens to minimize spherical aberration and achieve excellent in-focus reproduction. This lens is engineered to create a natural sense of depth. In comparison, the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 utilizes special glass materials, including LD (Low Dispersion) and GM (Glass Molded Aspherical) elements, to effectively combat aberrations and ensure sharp images across the entire frame. While both lenses offer solid optical performance, the Fujifilm's wider aperture may contribute to a more pronounced creative effect in portraits.
Use Cases: Portraits vs. Landscapes
The Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R is particularly well-suited for portrait photography, thanks to its focal length and fast f/1.4 aperture, which allows for stunning subject isolation and depth of field control. It excels in creating intimate and engaging portraits. The Tamron 24mm F/2.8, however, serves as a versatile option for landscape and street photography, providing a broader field of view that captures expansive scenes effectively. This lens is ideal for those who enjoy documenting travel or urban environments. The choice between these two lenses largely depends on the specific photography style you aim to achieve.
User Experience and Handling
In terms of handling, both lenses are lightweight and designed for ease of use. The Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R is celebrated for its intuitive design, making it a favorite among street photographers who value quick adaptability. The Tamron 24mm F/2.8 is also compact and easy to carry, making it a suitable companion for all-day shooting adventures. That said, the Tamron’s moisture-resistant features give it an added edge for outdoor photography, allowing users to shoot confidently in various weather conditions.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, choosing between the Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R and the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 depends on your specific needs and budget. If you prioritize low-light performance and portrait capabilities, the Fujifilm lens is the superior choice, albeit at a higher price point of $699.00. However, if you're looking for a versatile, budget-friendly option primarily for landscapes and urban scenes, the Tamron, priced at $199.00, presents an excellent value. Each lens has its strengths, and your decision should align with your photography style and the scenarios you most frequently encounter.

