Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R vs Tamron 28-
Updated July 2026 — Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R wins on aperture and weight, Tamron 28- wins on autofocus and focal length.
The Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R excels in low-light performance and price, while the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 offers versatility and advanced autofocus. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R is better
Price
Fujifilm is $50 cheaper.
Aperture
Fujifilm has a wider aperture for better bokeh.
Weight
Fujifilm is lighter at 4.1 oz.
Why Tamron 28- is better
Versatility
Tamron offers a zoom range of 28mm to 75mm.
Autofocus
Tamron has a fast VXD linear motor.
Close-Up
Tamron has a better minimum object distance.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R | Tamron 28- |
|---|---|---|
| Max Aperture | f/1.4 | f/2.8 |
| Focal Length | 35mm | 28-75mm |
| Weight | 4.1 oz | 19.4 oz |
| Close-Up | N/A | 7.1 in |
| Autofocus Type | Standard | VXD |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R is priced at $699.00, while the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 Di III VXD G2 comes in at $749.00. This makes the Fujifilm lens about 7% cheaper than the Tamron lens. If budget plays a significant role in your purchasing decision, the Fujifilm lens offers a more economical option without sacrificing quality. However, the price difference may be a worthwhile investment for those who require the additional versatility that the Tamron lens provides.
Focal Length and Versatility
In terms of focal length, the Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R has a fixed 35mm focal length, ideal for standard photography that mimics the human eye. The Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8, on the other hand, boasts a zoom range of 28mm to 75mm. This versatility allows for a wider range of compositions, from wide-angle shots to portraits. If you prefer a lens that can adapt to different shooting scenarios, the Tamron lens provides much more flexibility, making it suitable for various photography styles.
Aperture and Low-Light Performance
The Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R has a bright maximum aperture of f/1.4, allowing for excellent low-light performance and beautiful bokeh effects. This feature is particularly advantageous for portrait and street photography, where depth of field can enhance the subject's separation from the background. In contrast, the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 has a slightly less impressive maximum aperture of f/2.8. While it still performs well in low-light conditions, it may not achieve the same level of background blur as the Fujifilm lens. For those who prioritize low-light capabilities and bokeh, the Fujifilm lens stands out.
Autofocus Performance
The Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 is equipped with a fast, quiet VXD linear motor for high-speed and high-precision autofocus, making it ideal for capturing fast-moving subjects. This feature is particularly beneficial for event photography or shooting in dynamic environments. While the Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R does provide reliable autofocus, it does not specify the same advanced motor technology as its competitor. If you often find yourself in situations requiring quick focus adjustments, the Tamron lens may prove to be the better choice.
Build Quality and Handling
The Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 features moisture-resistant construction and a fluorine coating, enhancing its durability and usability in various weather conditions. It also has a compact design, measuring just 4.7 inches long and weighing 19.4 ounces. In contrast, the Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R weighs 4.1 ounces, making it lighter but lacking the same level of environmental protection. For photographers who frequently shoot outdoors or in challenging conditions, the Tamron lens offers superior build quality, while the Fujifilm lens is easier to carry for long sessions.
Close-Up Capabilities
When it comes to close-up photography, the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 excels with a minimum object distance (MOD) of 7.1 inches and a maximum magnification ratio of 1:2.7. This allows for creative close-up shots that can highlight intricate details of subjects. The Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R does not provide specific close-up capabilities, making it less suitable for macro photography. If capturing detailed, close-up images is a priority, the Tamron lens will serve you better in this regard.
Optical Performance
Both lenses offer excellent optical performance, but they cater to different needs. The Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R uses a glass-molded aspheric lens to minimize spherical aberration, resulting in sharp images with pleasing bokeh. The Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 is designed for high pixel resolution, ensuring it remains compatible with modern digital cameras. While the Fujifilm lens is geared more towards achieving aesthetic quality in imagery, the Tamron lens focuses on overall versatility and adaptability across various shooting conditions. Depending on whether your priority is artistic quality or flexibility, each lens has strengths that may appeal to different photographers.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R and the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 depends on your specific photography needs. If you prioritize a lower price, exceptional low-light performance, and beautiful bokeh, the Fujifilm lens is a fantastic choice. However, if you seek versatility, advanced autofocus capabilities, and better close-up performance, the Tamron lens may justify its higher price. Consider your shooting style and requirements carefully to determine which lens aligns best with your photographic goals.

