vsversusfinder

Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R vs TTARTISAN AF

Updated July 2026 — Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R wins on price and build, TTARTISAN AF wins on aperture.

The Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R excels in optical performance and build quality, while the TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8 offers affordability and portability.

Why Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R is better

Optical Quality

Superior optical performance with advanced lens design.

Build Quality

More substantial construction for durability.

Focal Length

Standard focal length closely resembles the human eye.

Why TTARTISAN AF is better

Price

Significantly cheaper option for budget-conscious photographers.

Portability

Ultra-compact pancake design for easy travel.

Autofocus

Advanced autofocus technology with eye recognition.

Overall score

Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R
85
TTARTISAN AF
70

Specifications

SpecFujifilm XF35mmF1.4 RTTARTISAN AF
Optical Design8 elements in 6 groupsStandard design
Focus TypeManual/TraditionalSTM Stepping Motor
CompatibilityFujifilm X MountFujifilm X Mount
Aperture ControlCamera bodyClicked aperture ring
Bokeh QualityExcellentGood

Dimension comparison

Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 RTTARTISAN AF

Price Comparison

The Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R is priced at $699.00, while the TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8 is significantly cheaper at $159.99, making it about 77% less expensive. This substantial price difference makes the TTARTISAN lens an attractive option for photographers on a budget. The Fujifilm lens, known for its quality and performance, comes with a premium price tag that reflects its advanced features. In contrast, the lower price point of the TTARTISAN lens may appeal to entry-level photographers or those seeking a compact solution without breaking the bank.

Design and Portability

When it comes to design, the TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8 stands out for its ultra-compact and pancake design, making it exceptionally portable and easy to carry. This lens is perfect for travel and casual shooting, fitting seamlessly into a compact camera bag. The Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R, while still relatively lightweight at 4.1 oz, is bulkier compared to the TTARTISAN lens. The difference in design philosophy caters to different user needs: the TTARTISAN lens is ideal for those prioritizing portability, while the Fujifilm lens appeals to those who desire more substantial construction and optical performance.

Optical Performance

The optical performance of the Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R is noteworthy, featuring eight elements in six groups, including one aspherical element. This design minimizes spherical aberration and enhances bokeh in out-of-focus areas, making it a favorite among portrait and street photographers. The TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8, while compact, does not boast the same level of optical complexity; however, it utilizes an STM stepping motor for smooth focusing, which can still yield impressive results in various shooting scenarios. For those who prioritize optical quality and creative depth, the Fujifilm lens is likely the better choice.

Focal Length and Versatility

The Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R has a focal length equivalent to 53mm in 135 format, providing a standard view closely resembling the human eye. This makes it versatile for a wide range of photography styles, from portraits to landscapes. In contrast, the TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8 offers a wider angle, making it suitable for street photography and capturing environmental portraits. The difference in focal lengths affects composition and framing, so the choice depends on the photographer's specific needs. Those looking for a natural perspective might prefer the Fujifilm lens, while those who enjoy wider shots may opt for the TTARTISAN.

Autofocus Technology

Autofocus technology varies significantly between the two lenses. The TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8 features an STM stepping motor for quick and quiet focusing, complemented by eye recognition focus that enhances the ability to capture sharp images of subjects. This is particularly useful for portrait photography and video recording, where focus accuracy is crucial. The Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R, however, does not emphasize autofocus technology in its description, suggesting that it may rely more on manual focus or traditional autofocus methods. Photographers who prioritize fast and reliable autofocus may lean towards the TTARTISAN lens.

Aperture Control

The aperture control is another area where these lenses differ. The TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8 includes a clicked aperture ring, providing users with a tactile and precise way to adjust exposure settings quickly. This feature enhances the shooting experience, especially in dynamic environments where speed is essential. In contrast, the Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R's description does not mention a dedicated aperture ring, which may require users to adjust settings through their camera body. For photographers who value direct control over their settings, the TTARTISAN lens may offer a more satisfying experience.

Compatibility and Upgrades

The TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8 is designed for a wide range of Fuji X mount cameras, including popular models like the X-E4 and X-T4. Additionally, it features a USB-C interface for firmware upgrades, allowing users to enhance the performance of the lens over time. This is a modern convenience that may not be available with the Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R, which is a more traditional lens without mention of such upgrade features. For tech-savvy photographers who enjoy keeping their gear up-to-date, the TTARTISAN lens presents a compelling advantage.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R and the TTARTISAN AF 27mm f2.8 depends largely on your photography needs and budget. The Fujifilm lens offers superior optical performance and a more natural focal length, making it ideal for serious photographers seeking high-quality images. However, its price of $699.00 may be prohibitive for some. On the other hand, the TTARTISAN lens, priced at $159.99, provides excellent portability and modern features like eye recognition focus and a clicked aperture ring, making it a great choice for casual shooters or those who prioritize convenience and affordability. Ultimately, your choice should reflect your specific requirements and how you intend to use the lens.