Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R vs VILTROX
Updated July 2026 — VILTROX leads on length and diameter.
The Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R excels in optical performance and aperture size, while the VILTROX 85mm F2.0 Z Lens offers great value and autofocus capabilities.
Why Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R is better
Optical Quality
Superior optical design with aspheric elements
Aperture
Wider maximum aperture of f/1.4
Brand Reputation
Fujifilm is known for high-quality imaging products
Why VILTROX is better
Price
Significantly cheaper at $275.00
Autofocus
Features advanced Stepping Motor for quiet autofocus
Close-Up
Minimum focusing distance of 0.74m for detailed shots
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R | VILTROX |
|---|---|---|
| Optical Design | 8 elements in 6 groups | 10 elements in 8 groups |
| Bokeh | Excellent | Stunning |
| Autofocus | Reliable | Stepping Motor |
| Close-Up | Not specified | 0.74m |
| Price | $699.00 | $275.00 |
Dimension comparison
Brand Overview
When comparing the Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R and the VILTROX 85mm F2.0 Z Lens, it's essential to consider the brands behind them. Fujifilm is renowned for its high-quality imaging products, and the XF35mmF1.4 R reflects this legacy with its exceptional optical performance. In contrast, VILTROX, while newer to the lens market, has made significant strides by offering lenses that focus on affordability and performance, appealing to a wide range of photographers. The VILTROX 85mm F2.0 Z is designed specifically for Nikon users, showcasing a commitment to meeting specific market needs.
Price Comparison
The price difference between the two lenses is quite significant. The Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R is priced at $699.00, while the VILTROX 85mm F2.0 Z Lens is available for only $275.00. This makes the VILTROX lens about 60% cheaper than the Fujifilm option. For photographers on a budget or those who are just starting, the VILTROX presents a compelling value proposition, allowing more room to invest in other photography gear or experiences.
Optical Performance
In terms of optical design, the Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R features 8 elements in 6 groups, including a glass-molded aspheric lens, to minimize spherical aberration and enhance image quality. This design contributes to a beautiful bokeh effect and excellent depth reproduction. The VILTROX 85mm F2.0 Z Lens, on the other hand, consists of 10 elements in 8 groups and incorporates Extra-low Dispersion (ED) elements, which help reduce chromatic aberration and improve color accuracy. Both lenses are engineered for sharpness, but the Fujifilm may excel in creating a natural sense of depth due to its unique optical elements.
Aperture and Bokeh
The aperture plays a crucial role in the creative potential of these lenses. The Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R has a bright maximum aperture of f/1.4, which allows for excellent low-light performance and a shallow depth of field. This makes it particularly suited for snapshots and portraits where background blur is essential. Conversely, the VILTROX 85mm F2.0 Z Lens has a slightly narrower aperture at f/2.0, which still provides stunning bokeh but may not achieve the same level of background separation as the Fujifilm. The difference in aperture size can influence the overall look of the images, especially in challenging lighting conditions.
Autofocus Capabilities
When it comes to autofocus performance, the VILTROX 85mm F2.0 Z Lens utilizes a Stepping Motor (STM) that ensures smooth, quiet, and precise autofocus, making it ideal for both photography and video work. The Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R, however, does not specify its autofocus system in detail. While Fujifilm lenses are generally known for reliable autofocus, the explicit mention of the VILTROX’s STM technology may give it an advantage in fast-paced shooting scenarios or when capturing video content.
Size and Weight
The physical dimensions and weight of a lens can impact portability and usability. The Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R weighs 4.1 ounces, making it relatively lightweight and easy to carry. In contrast, the VILTROX 85mm F2.0 Z Lens weighs 12.7 ounces, which is still quite manageable but heavier than the Fujifilm. The VILTROX lens measures φ69mm x 78mm, which is compact for an 85mm lens, enhancing its portability. Photographers who prioritize a lightweight setup may prefer the Fujifilm option, while those looking for a more robust portrait lens might find the VILTROX acceptable despite its additional weight.
Close-Up Performance
The VILTROX 85mm F2.0 Z Lens has a minimum focusing distance of 0.74 meters, allowing photographers to capture detailed close-up shots. This feature can be particularly beneficial for portrait photography, where getting closer to the subject can enhance the image's intimacy. The Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R does not specify a close-up focusing distance, which could limit its versatility for certain types of shooting. For photographers interested in macro-style portrait work, the VILTROX’s close-up capabilities provide a tangible advantage.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Fujifilm XF35mmF1.4 R and the VILTROX 85mm F2.0 Z Lens largely depends on your specific needs and budget. If you seek a high-quality, versatile lens with exceptional optical performance and are willing to invest $699.00, the Fujifilm is a strong contender. However, for those on a tighter budget or who prioritize autofocus performance and portability, the VILTROX at $275.00 offers remarkable value and features that make it an appealing option. Ultimately, the decision will hinge on whether you value premium optical quality and wider aperture over cost savings and specific functionality.

