Fujifilm Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II Lens vs Tamron 150-
Updated July 2026 — Fujifilm Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II Lens wins on weight and versatility, Tamron 150- wins on zoom.
The Fujinon lens excels in low-light performance and video features, while the Tamron offers a versatile zoom range at a lower price.
Why Fujifilm Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II Lens is better
Low-light Performance
Fujinon has a constant F2.8 aperture.
Video Features
Fujinon includes smooth aperture control.
Weight
Fujinon is lighter at 410g.
Why Tamron 150- is better
Zoom Range
Tamron offers 150-500mm focal length.
Price
Tamron is $200 cheaper.
Compact Size
Tamron is compact for a super-telephoto lens.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Fujifilm Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II Lens | Tamron 150- |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | F2.8 | F5-6.7 |
| Focal Length | 16-55mm | 150-500mm |
| Autofocus | Linear AF | VXD AF |
| Weather Resistance | Yes | Yes |
| Price | $1399.00 | $1199.00 |
Dimension comparison
Introduction to the Lenses
In this comparison, we’ll explore two high-quality camera lenses: the Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II Lens and the Tamron 150-500mm F/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD. The Fujinon lens is priced at $1,399.00, while the Tamron lens is slightly more affordable at $1,199.00, making it about 17% cheaper. Each lens caters to different photographic needs, thus understanding their unique features will help photographers make an informed choice.
Build and Design
The Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II Lens weighs only 410g (0.90lbs) and is designed for portability, making it an effortless daily carry. In contrast, the Tamron 150-500mm lens is compact for a full-frame zoom, measuring just 8.4 inches, and extends to 11.3 inches when fully zoomed. Both lenses are designed with moisture-resistant construction, but the Fujinon lens adds rugged weather resistance for more versatile outdoor use. Ultimately, those valuing lightweight design may prefer the Fujinon, while those needing a longer focal range may lean towards the Tamron.
Optical Performance
When it comes to optical performance, the Fujinon lens delivers superb subject separation and beautiful rounded bokeh due to its advanced lens elements and 11-blade iris. It excels in low-light conditions with its constant F2.8 aperture. On the other hand, the Tamron lens boasts exceptional image quality with controlled aberrations and high resolving power across the entire zoom range. The BBAR-G2 coating on the Tamron lens enhances clarity and contrast, making both lenses strong contenders for image quality. Photographers focused on low-light performance may prefer the Fujinon, while those interested in versatility and zoom range might choose the Tamron.
Autofocus and Video Features
The Fujinon lens is equipped with a near-silent linear AF motor, which provides fast and precise autofocus, ideal for both photography and video shooting. Additionally, it includes new video features, such as a smooth aperture control option that caters to videographers’ needs. Conversely, the Tamron lens features a high-speed linear motor autofocus mechanism, allowing for swift focusing even in challenging conditions. While both lenses offer excellent autofocus capabilities, the Fujinon’s specific video features may appeal more to those focused on creating video content.
Creative Potential
The Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II Lens is described as a "hybrid lens," making it suitable for both photographers and videographers. Its ability to deliver cinematic shallow depth-of-field adds immense creative potential for various shooting scenarios. The Tamron 150-500mm lens, with its impressive zoom range, allows for spontaneous shooting in ultra-telephoto situations, which can also inspire creativity. Depending on your style, the choice between the two may hinge on whether you prioritize the Fujinon’s versatility in different media or the Tamron’s extended reach for distant subjects.
Price Comparison
The Fujinon lens is priced at $1,399.00, while the Tamron lens comes in at $1,199.00. This makes the Tamron lens about $200 cheaper, which may be a significant factor for budget-conscious photographers. However, the performance and features of each lens must also be weighed against their prices. While the Fujinon offers advanced video features and low-light capabilities, the Tamron provides a wider zoom range at a lower cost. Thus, the choice will depend on the specific needs and budget of the photographer.
Portability and Convenience
Portability is a notable advantage of the Fujinon lens, which is lighter and smaller than its predecessor, making it an easy addition to any photography kit. The Tamron lens, though compact for a super-telephoto lens, is still bulkier than the Fujinon. This difference in size and weight can impact shooting comfort and convenience, especially during long photography sessions. For photographers who prioritize convenience and ease of transport, the Fujinon may be the better option, while those who require longer focal lengths might find the Tamron’s benefits outweigh its size.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Fujinon XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II Lens and the Tamron 150-500mm F/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD ultimately depends on your specific photographic needs. If you prioritize lightweight design, video features, and low-light performance, the Fujinon lens is worth the investment at $1,399.00. However, if you need a versatile zoom range for distant subjects and prefer a lower price point of $1,199.00, the Tamron lens is an excellent choice. Each lens has its strengths, making them suitable for different styles and preferences in photography.

