Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black vs Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-
Updated July 2026 — Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black wins on weather seal, Nikon NIKKOR Z 24- wins on price and focal length.
The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR is a budget-friendly prime lens with excellent low-light performance, while the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-120mm f/4 S offers versatility and premium optics for a higher price.
Why Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black is better
Price
Fujinon is significantly cheaper at $449.00.
Compactness
Fujinon is smaller and lighter, ideal for travel.
Close Focus
Fujinon has a closer minimum working distance of 13 inches.
Why Nikon NIKKOR Z 24- is better
Versatility
Nikon offers a zoom range of 24mm to 120mm.
Autofocus
Nikon has advanced dual STM motors for quiet focusing.
Optical Quality
Nikon features premium S-Line optics for superior resolution.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black | Nikon NIKKOR Z 24- |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Fujifilm | Nikon |
| Max Aperture | F2.0 | F4.0 |
| Autofocus Speed | 0.08s | N/A |
| Zoom Range | N/A | 24-120mm |
| Bokeh | Circular | N/A |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR and Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-120mm f/4 S
The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR is priced at $449.00, while the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-120mm f/4 S comes in at $1,096.95, making the Fujinon lens about 59% cheaper. This significant price difference sets the stage for a comparison between these two lenses, which serve different photographic needs. The Fujinon lens is a prime lens, known for its compact design and sharp image quality, while the Nikon lens is a versatile all-in-one zoom lens, aimed at those looking for a broader range of focal lengths.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance
Both lenses exhibit robust build quality, but they cater to different user needs in terms of weather resistance. The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR features a weather-resistant design with eight sealing points, allowing it to operate in conditions as low as 14 degrees Fahrenheit. This makes it a reliable choice for outdoor photography in challenging conditions. In contrast, while the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-120mm f/4 S is also built with weather-sealing in mind, specific details about its weather resistance are less emphasized. If extreme weather conditions are a consideration, the Fujinon lens may have the edge.
Focal Length and Versatility
The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR has a focal length equivalent of 53mm, while the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-120mm f/4 S offers a versatile zoom range of 24mm to 120mm, equating to 36mm to 180mm on DX format cameras. The wider range of the Nikon lens allows for more flexibility, from wide-angle shots to moderate telephoto, making it more suitable for diverse shooting scenarios. For photographers who need to switch between different types of shots without changing lenses frequently, the Nikon lens provides a distinct advantage.
Autofocus Performance
Autofocus performance varies significantly between the two lenses. The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR boasts an impressive autofocus speed of 0.08 seconds, which is ideal for capturing fast-moving subjects. This quick focusing is complemented by its near-silent operation, making it a great choice for stealthy photography. On the other hand, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-120mm f/4 S employs two high-speed, ultra-quiet STM stepping motors for autofocus, enabling sharp focus across its entire zoom range. While both lenses offer efficient autofocus, the Fujinon may excel in scenarios requiring rapid focus shifts.
Image Quality and Optical Features
The optical quality of both lenses is commendable, but they achieve this in different ways. The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR features a nine-blade aperture, which creates smooth and circular bokeh, enhancing portrait and close-up photography. It also incorporates Nano-GI coating to reduce ghosting and flare, ensuring crisp images. In contrast, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-120mm f/4 S is built with premium S-Line optics aimed at delivering superior resolution across its zoom range. While both lenses provide excellent image quality, the choice may hinge on whether you prefer the artistry of a prime lens or the versatility of a zoom lens.
Close Focusing Capabilities
The close focusing capabilities of these lenses vary, impacting their usability for specific types of photography. The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR has a minimum working distance of approximately 13 inches, allowing for intimate close-up shots. Conversely, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-120mm f/4 S offers a close focusing distance of 1.15 feet at any zoom position, making it suitable for detailed work whether at the wide or telephoto end. For photographers aiming to capture intricate details in their subjects, the Fujinon lens may provide a slight advantage in close-up scenarios.
User Experience and Handling
When it comes to user experience, the handling of each lens offers unique advantages. The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR's compact size and lightweight construction make it easy to carry, ideal for street photography or travel. Its inner focus system enhances usability by allowing for a streamlined lens design. On the other hand, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-120mm f/4 S features a custom control ring that can be used for various functions, such as controlling aperture, ISO, or exposure compensation, providing photographers with customizable control right at their fingertips. This design choice may appeal to those looking for a more tailored shooting experience.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, the choice between the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR and the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-120mm f/4 S largely depends on your specific photography needs. If you prioritize a budget-friendly option that excels in low-light conditions and close-up photography, the Fujinon lens is an excellent choice. However, if you seek versatility across a wide range of focal lengths and are willing to invest more for premium optics, the Nikon lens offers significant advantages. Ultimately, your decision should align with your shooting style and the types of subjects you intend to capture.

