vsversusfinder

Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black vs SIRUI Night Walker

Updated July 2026 — Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black wins on weight and focus type, SIRUI Night Walker wins on diameter.

The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR excels in weather resistance and autofocus, while the SIRUI Night Walker 35mm offers superior low-light performance and is more budget-friendly.

Why Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black is better

Weather Resistance

Fujinon has a weather-sealed design.

Autofocus Speed

Fujinon achieves focus in 0.08 seconds.

Optical Quality

Fujinon features Nano-GI coating to reduce ghosting.

Why SIRUI Night Walker is better

Price

SIRUI is 38% cheaper.

Low-Light Performance

SIRUI has a T1.2 aperture for better low-light shooting.

Manual Focus Control

SIRUI offers precise manual focus.

Overall score

Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black
85
SIRUI Night Walker
75

Specifications

SpecFujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - BlackSIRUI Night Walker
Max ApertureF2.0T1.2
AutofocusYesNo
WeightUnknown500g
CompatibilityFujifilm XE-mount
Bokeh Blades912

Dimension comparison

Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - BlackSIRUI Night Walker

Design and Build Quality

When it comes to design and build quality, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR boasts a weather-resistant design with eight sealing points, making it suitable for extreme conditions. In contrast, the SIRUI Night Walker 35mm S35 is built with a sturdy aluminum cine housing that is lightweight, weighing around 500g. The Fujinon lens measures up well in terms of durability, featuring a compact size and an inner focus system that operates quietly, ideal for stealthy photography. The SIRUI lens, while not weather-sealed, prioritizes portability and aesthetic appeal with its sleek black or metal gray finish. Both lenses offer a premium feel, but the Fujinon has the edge in ruggedness.

Aperture and Low-Light Performance

The SIRUI Night Walker 35mm excels in low-light conditions due to its large T1.2 aperture, which allows for outstanding performance without the need for high ISO settings. This feature contributes to pleasing bokeh quality, enhancing the expressiveness of its footage. On the other hand, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR features a maximum aperture of F2.0, which, while still effective for low-light photography, does not match the performance of the SIRUI in extreme conditions. The difference in aperture size is significant, making the SIRUI about 40% faster in low-light scenarios, which can be crucial for filmmakers and photographers working in dim environments.

Autofocus Versus Manual Focus

The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR has a speedy autofocus system, achieving focus in just 0.08 seconds. This makes it an excellent choice for photographers who need quick, accurate focusing, especially in dynamic shooting situations. In contrast, the SIRUI Night Walker is a manual focus lens, which may appeal to filmmakers and photographers who prefer the control and precision that manual focusing provides. While autofocus is convenient, the manual focus of the SIRUI allows for creative adjustments that some professionals might find beneficial. This trade-off between speed and control can influence the choice depending on the user's shooting style.

Optical Performance

Both lenses offer impressive optical performance, but they cater to different needs. The Fujinon lens is designed to deliver sharp images with rich bokeh, thanks to its nine-blade aperture. Its Nano-GI coating significantly reduces ghosting and flare, providing clear images in challenging lighting conditions. On the other hand, the SIRUI Night Walker is designed to maintain sharpness even at its maximum aperture of T1.2, with minimal focus breathing and well-controlled aberration. This makes the SIRUI particularly appealing for cinematographers who prioritize optical quality in video production. The choice here depends on whether the primary use is photography or videography.

Price Comparison

The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR is priced at $449.00, while the SIRUI Night Walker 35mm is priced at $279.00. This makes the SIRUI about 38% cheaper than the Fujinon lens. For budget-conscious buyers, the SIRUI offers significant savings without sacrificing quality, especially for those focused on video. The price difference could be a deciding factor for many, particularly those who are just starting in photography or videography and need a more affordable option.

Intended Use and Versatility

The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR is geared more towards photographers, especially those who shoot in various conditions, thanks to its weather-sealed design and fast autofocus. It is versatile enough for street photography, portraits, and general use. Conversely, the SIRUI Night Walker is targeted at filmmakers, offering features suited for cinematography, like its large aperture and manual focus capabilities. While both lenses can serve multiple purposes, their design and functionality cater to distinct user needs, which is essential when making a choice based on intended use.

Compatibility and Mounting

The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR is compatible with Fujifilm X-mount cameras, while the SIRUI Night Walker is designed for E-mount cameras, including models like FX30, ZVE-10, A6500, and A6600. This compatibility is crucial for users, as it restricts your choice based on the camera system you own. If you're using a Fujifilm camera, the Fujinon lens is the clear choice. However, for those with Sony E-mount cameras, the SIRUI lens becomes the obvious option, further emphasizing the importance of camera compatibility in the selection process.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR and the SIRUI Night Walker 35mm S35 depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you prioritize weather resistance, fast autofocus, and compact design for photography in various conditions, the Fujinon lens is the way to go. However, if you're looking for a more budget-friendly option that excels in low-light cinematography and offers manual focus control, the SIRUI lens is a fantastic choice. Each lens has its strengths, making the decision more about the user's intended use and camera compatibility than about one being definitively better than the other.