Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black vs Tamron 150-
Updated July 2026 — Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black wins on weight and build, Tamron 150- wins on versatility and price.
The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR is a great choice for those seeking a compact, high-quality prime lens, while the Tamron 150-500mm excels in versatility for distant subjects.
Why Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black is better
Price
Fujinon is significantly cheaper at $449.
Weight
Fujinon is lighter and more portable.
Close-up
Fujinon has a shorter minimum working distance.
Why Tamron 150- is better
Versatility
Tamron offers a wide zoom range from 150mm to 500mm.
Image Quality
Tamron provides high resolving power edge-to-edge.
Autofocus
Tamron features a high-speed linear motor for autofocus.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black | Tamron 150- |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 35mm | 150-500mm |
| Minimum Distance | 13 inches | 23.6 inches |
| Aperture Blades | 9 | 7 |
| Weather Sealing | Yes | Yes |
| Coating | Nano-GI | BBAR-G2 |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When comparing the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR and the Tamron 150-500mm F/5-6.7, the Fujinon lens is about 63% cheaper, priced at $449.00, while the Tamron lens costs $1,199.00. This significant price difference reflects the distinct functionalities and target user bases of each lens. The lower price of the Fujinon lens makes it an attractive option for photographers looking for a high-quality prime lens without breaking the bank, while the Tamron lens, with its expansive zoom range, is designed for those needing versatility in their photography.
Design and Build Quality
The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR boasts a weather-resistant design with eight sealing points, allowing it to operate in extreme conditions down to 14 degrees. This makes it an excellent choice for outdoor photographers who may face various weather challenges. In contrast, the Tamron 150-500mm features a moisture-resistant construction and a fluorine coating, enhancing its durability and usability in less-than-ideal conditions. Both lenses are built to withstand outdoor use, but the Fujinon’s more robust weather-sealing may provide an edge for those who frequently shoot in adverse weather.
Autofocus Performance
The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR features an inner focus system with an impressive autofocus speed of just 0.08 seconds. This quick and nearly silent operation is ideal for photographers who require swift focusing, such as street photographers or those capturing wildlife. On the other hand, the Tamron 150-500mm is equipped with a high-speed linear motor autofocus mechanism, ensuring precise and rapid focusing across its extensive zoom range. While both lenses offer reliable autofocus, the Fujinon may appeal more to those who prioritize speed and stealth in their shooting.
Image Quality
Both lenses deliver exceptional image quality, but their capabilities differ significantly. The Fujinon lens is designed to produce sharp images with rich bokeh, thanks in part to its nine-blade aperture and Nano-GI coating, which helps to reduce ghosting and flare. Meanwhile, the Tamron lens boasts thoroughly controlled aberrations and high resolving power edge-to-edge, ensuring clarity and contrast throughout its zoom range. Photographers focused on portrait or close-up photography might prefer the Fujinon for its bokeh effects, while those shooting sports or wildlife may find the Tamron’s vast zoom range and clarity superior for distant subjects.
Focal Length and Versatility
The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR offers a 35mm focal length, which translates to a 53mm equivalent in 35mm format. This prime lens is ideal for general photography, including portraits, street photography, and landscapes. On the other hand, the Tamron 150-500mm provides an extensive focal length range from 150mm to 500mm, making it incredibly versatile for capturing distant subjects. Whether you’re photographing wildlife or sporting events, the Tamron lens allows for spontaneous shooting without the need for a tripod, a clear advantage for photographers needing flexibility in the field.
Minimum Working Distance
The Fujinon lens has a minimum working distance of approximately 13 inches, allowing for effective close-up photography. This feature makes it a suitable choice for shooting subjects like flowers or small objects. In contrast, the Tamron 150-500mm has a minimum object distance (MOD) of 23.6 inches at the 150mm end, which, while still allowing for close focusing, does not match the Fujinon’s capabilities for extreme close-ups. If close-up work is a priority, the Fujinon’s shorter minimum distance is a notable advantage.
User Experience and Handling
In terms of user experience, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR is compact and lightweight, making it easy to carry for extended periods. Its design caters to photographers who value mobility alongside performance, especially in urban environments. The Tamron 150-500mm, while compact for a super-telephoto lens, is still larger and heavier, which may limit its portability. Photographers who plan to shoot on the go or need a lens for casual outings may find the Fujinon more user-friendly, whereas those focused on telephoto capabilities will appreciate the Tamron’s performance, despite the added bulk.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR and the Tamron 150-500mm F/5-6.7 largely depends on your specific photography needs. If you’re looking for a high-quality, weather-resistant prime lens for portraits or street photography at an attractive price of $449.00, the Fujinon lens is an excellent choice. However, if your focus is on versatility and capturing distant subjects, the Tamron lens offers a powerful zoom range and top-notch image quality, albeit at a higher price of $1,199.00. Ultimately, your decision should align with the type of photography you pursue and the features that matter most to you.

