Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black vs Tamron
Updated July 2026 — Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black leads on price and weather.
The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR excels in durability and performance, while the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 offers great value and versatility.
Why Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black is better
Build Quality
Weather-resistant design with 8 sealing points
Autofocus
0.08 seconds autofocus speed
Image Quality
Nano-GI coating reduces ghosting and flare
Why Tamron is better
Price
56% cheaper than Fujinon
Weight
Compact and lightweight design
Close-up
4.7 inches minimum object distance
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black | Tamron |
|---|---|---|
| Aperture | F2.0 | F2.8 |
| Max Magnification | 0.17x | 1:2 |
| Bokeh Blades | 9 | 7 |
| Coating | Nano-GI | Fluorine |
| Minimum Distance | 13 in | 4.7 in |
Dimension comparison
Design and Build Quality
The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR boasts a weather-resistant design with eight sealing points, making it suitable for challenging environments. In contrast, the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2 features a compact and lightweight design, measuring just 2.5 inches in length and weighing 7.6 oz. The Fujinon lens, although slightly heavier, offers superior durability as it functions effectively in conditions as low as 14 degrees Fahrenheit. This robustness is paired with an inner focus system that provides an impressive autofocus speed of 0.08 seconds. While both lenses are designed for outdoor use, the Fujinon’s weather resistance gives it an edge for adventurous photographers.
Focal Length and Versatility
Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR has a focal length of 35mm, equivalent to 53mm in a 35mm format, making it a great choice for portrait and street photography. On the other hand, the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 provides a wider perspective, perfect for capturing expansive landscapes, city scenes, and everyday moments. The 24mm focal length gives photographers the ability to take immersive shots, while the 35mm lens excels in creating beautiful bokeh due to its nine-blade aperture. Each lens serves its own specific purposes, making them versatile options depending on the desired shooting style, with the Tamron lens being ideal for wide-angle photography.
Optical Performance
Both lenses are designed with advanced optical features to deliver high-quality images. The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR utilizes Nano-GI coating to reduce ghosting and flare, ensuring clear images even in challenging lighting conditions. Meanwhile, the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 employs special glass materials, including Low Dispersion (LD) and Glass Molded Aspherical (GM) elements, to effectively minimize aberrations. This design allows the Tamron lens to provide outstanding optical performance across the entire frame, yielding sharp images rich in detail. Photographers seeking precision and clarity will find both lenses excel in their respective focal lengths.
Autofocus and Usability
The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR features an inner focus system that achieves autofocus speeds of as fast as 0.08 seconds, making it highly responsive for capturing fleeting moments. In contrast, the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 emphasizes usability with its minimum object distance of 4.7 inches, allowing for unique close-up shots. This versatility makes the Tamron great for macro-style photography, while the Fujinon lens shines in situations requiring swift focus, such as street photography. Photographers will appreciate the quick and quiet operation of the Fujinon lens, while the Tamron’s close-focusing capabilities will appeal to those seeking detail in their compositions.
Price Comparison
The price difference between the two lenses is significant, with the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR retailing at $449.00, while the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 is priced at $199.00. This makes the Tamron about 56% cheaper than the Fujinon lens, presenting a more budget-friendly option for photographers. The lower price does not compromise the quality, as the Tamron still offers impressive optical performance and usability features. This price point may make the Tamron a more attractive option for amateur photographers or those just beginning to explore wide-angle photography.
Target Audience
The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR is especially suited for professional photographers who demand high-quality images in various conditions, including low light and adverse weather. Its robust build and fast autofocus system cater to those who capture dynamic scenes. Conversely, the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 is ideal for hobbyists and casual photographers who appreciate a lightweight, versatile lens for everyday use. It is particularly appealing to those interested in landscape photography or urban exploration, where a wide-angle lens can make a significant difference in capturing expansive scenes.
Conclusion
In summary, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR and the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 each serve distinct purposes in the realm of photography. The Fujinon excels in durability, speed, and portrait capabilities, making it a premium choice for professionals. Meanwhile, the Tamron provides an excellent balance of affordability, versatility, and ease of use, ideal for those venturing into wide-angle photography.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR and the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 depends on your specific photographic needs and budget. If you prioritize weather resistance, fast autofocus, and are willing to invest more for these features, the Fujinon is the way to go. However, if you seek a lightweight, cost-effective lens for general-purpose shooting and landscapes, the Tamron is the clear winner.

