vsversusfinder

Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black vs Tamron 28-

Updated July 2026 — Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black wins on price and weight, Tamron 28- wins on versatility.

The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR excels in portability and low-light performance, while the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 G2 offers versatility with its zoom range. Choose based on your shooting style.

Why Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black is better

Price

Fujinon is $300 cheaper than Tamron

Portability

Fujinon is lighter and more compact

Low-light

Fujinon has a wider maximum aperture

Why Tamron 28- is better

Versatility

Tamron covers a wider focal length range

Close-ups

Tamron has a shorter minimum object distance

Autofocus

Tamron features a fast VXD linear motor

Overall score

Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black
85
Tamron 28-
78

Specifications

SpecFujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - BlackTamron 28-
Max ApertureF2.0F2.8
Focal Length35mm28-75mm
WeatherproofYesYes
Minimum Distance13in7.1in
Bokeh Blades97

Dimension comparison

Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - BlackTamron 28-

Overview of the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR and Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 Di III VXD G2

The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR is a prime lens priced at $449.00, while the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 Di III VXD G2 comes in at $749.00, making it about 17% more expensive. Both lenses target photographers seeking high-quality optics, but they cater to different shooting styles and preferences. The Fujinon lens is compact, lightweight, and ideal for street photography, while the Tamron lens offers versatility with its zoom range, making it suitable for a broader array of photography needs.

Build Quality and Design

When it comes to build quality, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR features a weather-resistant design with eight sealing points for protection against moisture and dust. This allows for operation in extreme conditions down to 14 degrees Fahrenheit. On the other hand, the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 G2 also boasts a moisture-resistant construction and includes a fluorine coating, contributing to durability. Both lenses are designed for rugged use, but the Fujinon’s extensive weatherproofing could be a deciding factor for those shooting in challenging environments.

Autofocus Performance

The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR offers an inner focus system that achieves an autofocus speed of 0.08 seconds, providing nearly silent operation. This makes it an excellent choice for capturing candid moments without drawing attention. Conversely, the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 G2 utilizes a VXD linear motor for high-speed and high-precision autofocus, ensuring quick adjustments for varying scenes. While both lenses excel in autofocus performance, the Fujinon’s speed advantage may appeal to those who prioritize stealth and speed in their photography.

Image Quality

In terms of image quality, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR delivers a maximum aperture of F2.0, which produces sharp images with beautiful bokeh, thanks to its nine-blade aperture. The lens is designed to minimize ghosting and flare, thanks to its Nano-GI coating. Meanwhile, the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 G2 offers a constant maximum aperture of F2.8 throughout its zoom range. This can be advantageous for photographers who want consistent exposure while zooming. Both lenses are engineered for superior optical performance, but the Fujinon may have an edge in low-light scenarios due to its wider aperture.

Versatility and Usage

The Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 G2 stands out for its versatility, covering a focal length range from 28mm to 75mm, making it suitable for everything from landscape to portrait photography. It has a minimum object distance of 7.1 inches at the wide end, allowing for creative close-ups. In contrast, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR, with its fixed 35mm focal length (53mm equivalent), is more specialized for street and portrait photography. Photographers who value flexibility in their shooting style may prefer the Tamron, while those who favor the clarity and simplicity of a prime lens will likely lean towards the Fujinon.

Weight and Portability

The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR weighs significantly less than the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 G2, making it a more portable option for photographers who are often on the go. The Fujinon is compact and lightweight, which is particularly beneficial for street photography where every ounce counts. The Tamron, while still reasonably compact at 4.7 inches long and weighing 19.4 ounces, is bulkier due to its zoom capabilities. For photographers prioritizing portability, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR may be the more attractive option.

Price Comparison

The price difference between the two lenses is notable, with the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR priced at $449.00 and the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 G2 at $749.00. This makes the Fujinon about $300 cheaper than the Tamron, presenting a significant cost saving for those on a budget. While the Tamron offers a versatile zoom range and advanced features, the Fujinon’s lower price point may appeal to those who want high-quality images without breaking the bank.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR and the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 G2 ultimately depends on your specific photography needs. If you prioritize portability, low-light performance, and a lower price point, the Fujinon lens is an excellent choice. However, if versatility and a broader focal range are critical for your shooting style, the Tamron lens offers great features that justify its higher price. Both lenses deliver exceptional quality, so your decision should be guided by the type of photography you pursue most often.