vsversusfinder

Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black vs Tamron 70-

Updated July 2026 — Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black wins on weather and focus speed, Tamron 70- wins on price and weight.

The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR excels in image quality and weather resistance, while the Tamron 70-300mm offers versatility and portability. Choose based on your specific photography needs.

Why Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black is better

Image Quality

Fujinon delivers sharper images with better bokeh.

Weather Resistance

Fujinon is built for extreme conditions.

Autofocus Speed

Fujinon focuses in just 0.08 seconds.

Why Tamron 70- is better

Versatility

Tamron covers a wider focal range.

Portability

Tamron is lighter and more compact.

Price

Tamron is $50 cheaper.

Overall score

Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - Black
88
Tamron 70-
82

Specifications

SpecFujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - BlackTamron 70-
Focal Length35mm70-300mm
Aperturef/2f/4.5-6.3
Max Magnification0.17x1:5.1
SealingYesNo
Autofocus0.08sQuiet RXD

Dimension comparison

Fujifilm Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR - BlackTamron 70-

Overview of the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR and Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD

The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR is priced at $449.00, while the Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD is about 17% cheaper at $399.00. Both lenses cater to unique photographic needs, with the Fujinon offering a prime lens experience and the Tamron providing a versatile telephoto zoom option. The choice between these two lenses largely depends on the type of photography you intend to pursue.

Design and Build Quality

The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR boasts a weather-resistant design with eight sealing points, ensuring reliability in challenging conditions. This lens is built to operate in temperatures as low as 14 degrees Fahrenheit, making it an excellent choice for outdoor photography enthusiasts. On the other hand, the Tamron 70-300mm features a lightweight construction that emphasizes portability, weighing just 19.2 oz and measuring 5.8 inches long. While both lenses are well-constructed, the Fujinon leans towards durability in adverse weather, whereas the Tamron excels in ease of handling for extended shooting sessions.

Autofocus Performance

The autofocus capabilities of the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR are impressive, achieving focus in just 0.08 seconds. This makes it nearly silent during operation, making it suitable for stealthy photography situations. Conversely, the Tamron 70-300mm incorporates the RXD (Rapid eXtra-silent stepping Drive) unit for a high-speed, quiet autofocus system, catering to those who appreciate silence during shoots. Both lenses excel in autofocus, but the Fujinon has a slight edge in speed, making it ideal for capturing fleeting moments.

Image Quality

When it comes to image quality, the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR is known for delivering sharp images with rich bokeh, thanks to its nine-blade aperture. The lens also features a Nano-GI coating that minimizes ghosting and flare, ensuring high-quality results. The Tamron 70-300mm, with its 15 elements arranged in 10 groups, emphasizes resolving power and corrects chromatic aberration effectively. This lens provides stunning bokeh qualities, particularly beneficial in portrait and wildlife photography. While both lenses offer excellent image quality, the Fujinon may slightly outperform in sharpness and contrast due to its prime lens design.

Versatility in Shooting

The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR is a prime lens with a 35mm focal length, which translates to a 53mm equivalent in 35mm format. This makes it ideal for street photography, portraits, and general use where a natural field of view is preferred. In contrast, the Tamron 70-300mm offers a versatile focal range of 70-300mm, providing a 105-450mm equivalent on APS-C cameras. This flexibility allows photographers to capture a wide range of subjects, from landscapes to wildlife, making it a more adaptable choice for varying shooting scenarios.

Special Features

The Fujinon lens stands out with its weather and dust-resistant features, allowing photographers to work confidently in harsh environments. The inclusion of a fast inner focus system adds to its appeal for those who need quick responsiveness. Meanwhile, the Tamron lens focuses on lightweight portability and up-close shooting capabilities, with a minimum focusing distance of 31.5 inches at wide and 59.1 inches at telephoto. Each lens brings unique features that cater to different photography styles, with the Fujinon leaning towards durability and the Tamron emphasizing convenience.

Pricing and Value for Money

The Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR is priced at $449.00, while the Tamron 70-300mm is available for $399.00. The $50 price difference may influence budget-conscious buyers, especially when considering the versatility of the Tamron lens. For photographers seeking a prime lens for specific applications, the Fujinon may justify its higher price through superior image quality and build. However, for those needing a broader focal length range without sacrificing quality, the Tamron offers excellent value.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Fujinon XF35mmF2 R WR and the Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD ultimately depends on your photographic needs. If you prioritize a lightweight, versatile telephoto lens that excels in various shooting conditions, the Tamron is a compelling option at $399.00. However, if you seek a prime lens with superior image quality and weather resistance, the Fujinon, priced at $449.00, may be worth the investment. Each lens serves distinct purposes, making your choice dependent on the style of photography you wish to pursue.