FULYA Automatic Toothbrush with Teeth Whitening vs Magentak Ultrasonic U-Shaped Toothbrush for
Updated August 2026 — FULYA Automatic Toothbrush with Teeth Whitening wins on charging and price, Magentak Ultrasonic U-Shaped Toothbrush for wins on battery and modes.
The FULYA toothbrush offers a more affordable option with solid features, while the Magentak provides longer battery life and more cleaning modes. Overall, the FULYA is the better choice for budget-conscious consumers.
Why FULYA Automatic Toothbrush with Teeth Whitening is better
Price
FULYA is $8.40 cheaper
Charging Time
FULYA charges in 3 hours
Ease of Use
FULYA has a simpler design
Why Magentak Ultrasonic U-Shaped Toothbrush for is better
Battery Life
Magentak lasts 1-2 months
Cleaning Modes
Magentak has 4 modes
Bristle Count
Magentak has 23,760 bristles
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | FULYA Automatic Toothbrush with Teeth Whitening | Magentak Ultrasonic U-Shaped Toothbrush for |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | FULYA | Magentak |
| Price | $24.59 | $32.99 |
| Modes | 3 | 4 |
| Battery Life | 1 week | 1-2 months |
| Bristles | N/A | 23,760 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Products
In this comparison, we have the FULYA Automatic Toothbrush with Teeth Whitening Mousse and the Magentak Ultrasonic U-Shaped Toothbrush for Adults. The FULYA toothbrush is priced at $24.59, while the Magentak toothbrush comes in at $32.99. This positions the FULYA toothbrush as about 17% cheaper than its competitor. Both products feature unique designs aimed at enhancing oral hygiene through ultrasonic technology, but they target different user preferences and needs.
Design and Ergonomics
The FULYA toothbrush features a unique U-shape design that conforms closely to the gums, optimizing the cleaning experience. This ergonomic design, combined with ultrasonic technology, ensures that users can achieve thorough teeth cleaning with minimal effort. Conversely, the Magentak toothbrush also incorporates a U-shaped design, tailored to match the natural form of teeth, which allows for simultaneous cleaning of all teeth. This design feature aims to reduce brushing time to as little as 30 seconds. While both designs offer advantages, the FULYA emphasizes comfort and ease of use, while the Magentak focuses on speed and efficiency.
Cleaning Technology
When it comes to cleaning technology, both toothbrushes utilize high-frequency sonic vibrations to enhance plaque removal. The FULYA toothbrush claims to provide 360° cleaning in just 45 seconds, which is beneficial for those with busy lifestyles. In comparison, the Magentak toothbrush boasts 23,760 nylon bristles designed to ensure detailed cleaning inside and outside of the teeth. This particular feature might appeal to users looking for a more thorough clean, especially with its four different cleaning modes: whiten, sensitive, clean, and polish. While both products use sonic technology, the Magentak may offer more customization in cleaning modes.
Battery Life and Charging
The FULYA Automatic Toothbrush offers a wireless charging feature that requires only three hours to fully recharge, providing up to one week of use on a single charge. This is particularly convenient for both home use and travel. On the other hand, the Magentak toothbrush has a built-in 500mAh rechargeable battery that can last for 1-2 months on a single charge. This extended battery life makes the Magentak more appealing for users who prefer not to recharge their toothbrush frequently. Thus, while the FULYA is quick to charge, the Magentak excels in longevity.
Cleaning Modes
The FULYA toothbrush offers three cleaning modes: strong, medium, and massage. This variety caters to different brushing preferences, whether users desire a powerful clean or a gentler approach for gum massage. In contrast, the Magentak toothbrush provides four distinct modes, which include options specifically for whitening and polishing. This additional mode could be particularly advantageous for users focused on cosmetic improvements in their oral health. Therefore, while both toothbrushes provide versatile cleaning options, the Magentak may offer a slight edge in customization with its extra cleaning mode.
Materials and Build Quality
Both toothbrushes emphasize the use of high-quality materials to ensure durability and safety. The FULYA toothbrush features a head made of food-grade silicone, which is known for its safety and ease of cleaning. Its handle is designed to be waterproof (IPX7), making it suitable for use in the bathroom without worry of damage. The Magentak toothbrush, on the other hand, combines ABS plastic and silicone, with its U-shaped head containing 23,760 nylon bristles. While both products are built to last, FULYA's choice of food-grade silicone may appeal more to health-conscious consumers.
Waterproof Rating
Both toothbrushes come with an IPX7 waterproof rating, ensuring they can withstand exposure to water. This feature is essential for any electric toothbrush, as it allows for easy cleaning and durability in a wet environment. The FULYA toothbrush emphasizes its waterproof handle but notes that the charging dock is not waterproof. The Magentak toothbrush, while also rated IPX7, highlights its ability to function even if submerged in water, which could provide peace of mind for users concerned about accidental slips in the bathroom.
Price Comparison
The FULYA Automatic Toothbrush is priced at $24.59, making it a budget-friendly option compared to the Magentak Ultrasonic U-Shaped Toothbrush, which costs $32.99. This price difference of about $8.40 may be significant for consumers looking for effective oral care solutions without breaking the bank. Despite being priced lower, the FULYA toothbrush does not compromise on features, offering essential functionalities for effective teeth cleaning.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the FULYA Automatic Toothbrush with Teeth Whitening Mousse and the Magentak Ultrasonic U-Shaped Toothbrush depends largely on user preferences. If you're looking for a more affordable option with solid features, the FULYA toothbrush is an excellent choice, particularly due to its ease of use and quick charging time. However, if you prefer a toothbrush that offers a wider range of cleaning modes and longer battery life, the Magentak may be worth the extra investment. Ultimately, both toothbrushes provide effective cleaning solutions, but the right choice will vary based on individual needs and budget considerations.

