FULYA Automatic Toothbrush with Teeth Whitening vs Magentak Ultrasonic U-Shaped Toothbrush for Teeth
Updated August 2026 — FULYA Automatic Toothbrush with Teeth Whitening wins on cleaning time and price, Magentak Ultrasonic U-Shaped Toothbrush for Teeth wins on battery and modes.
The FULYA toothbrush offers a budget-friendly option with efficient cleaning, while the Magentak provides longer battery life and more cleaning modes.
Why FULYA Automatic Toothbrush with Teeth Whitening is better
price
FULYA is cheaper at $24.59
cleaning time
FULYA completes cleaning in 45 seconds
package value
FULYA includes toothpaste foam
Why Magentak Ultrasonic U-Shaped Toothbrush for Teeth is better
battery life
Magentak lasts 3-4 weeks on a charge
cleaning modes
Magentak has three distinct modes
accessories
Magentak includes multiple brush heads
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | FULYA Automatic Toothbrush with Teeth Whitening | Magentak Ultrasonic U-Shaped Toothbrush for Teeth |
|---|---|---|
| Charging Time | 3 hours | 4 hours |
| Waterproof | IPX7 | IPX7 |
| Vibration Frequency | N/A | 15,000-35,000 |
| Brush Head Material | Food-grade silicone | Food-grade silicone |
| Sales Rank | 110906 | 73580 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Products
When comparing the FULYA Automatic Toothbrush with Teeth Whitening Mousse and the Magentak Ultrasonic U-Shaped Toothbrush for Teeth Whitening, price and design play crucial roles. The FULYA toothbrush is priced at $24.59, making it about 17% cheaper than the Magentak, which retails for $29.99. Both products offer innovative ultrasonic cleaning technology, but their features and usability differ significantly.
Design and Ergonomics
The FULYA toothbrush features a unique U-shape that is designed to fit the gums better than traditional toothbrushes. This ergonomic design, combined with high-frequency sonic technology, allows for 360° cleaning in just 45 seconds. In contrast, the Magentak toothbrush also has a U-shaped design tailored to the contour of your teeth, promoting effective cleaning through high-frequency vibrations that can reach 15,000-35,000 times per minute. Both designs aim to enhance user comfort, but the FULYA's efficiency in cleaning time might appeal to those with busy lifestyles.
Cleaning Modes and Technology
The FULYA toothbrush offers three cleaning modes: strong, medium, and massage, allowing users to choose according to their needs. It effectively completes a thorough cleaning in less than a minute. On the other hand, the Magentak toothbrush provides three distinct modes as well: standard, fast, and super-speed, which gives users more options for customization. While both products utilize ultrasonic technology, the range of modes in the Magentak may attract users looking for a tailored brushing experience.
Battery Life and Charging
Battery life is a critical factor for electric toothbrushes. The FULYA offers a rechargeable battery that lasts for about one week on a three-hour charge. Comparatively, the Magentak features a more robust built-in 500mAh battery, which can last for 3-4 weeks after a four-hour charge. This significant difference in battery longevity makes the Magentak a more convenient option for those who travel frequently or prefer less frequent charging.
Material and Build Quality
Both toothbrushes are constructed from food-grade silicone for their brush heads, ensuring safety during use. The FULYA handle is designed with an IPX7 waterproof rating, making it easy to clean, although the charging dock is not waterproof. The Magentak toothbrush also boasts an IPX7 waterproof rating, allowing it to be submerged without damage. This means both products can withstand regular exposure to water, but the Magentak's overall design may offer slightly better durability in wet environments.
Accessories and Package Contents
The FULYA toothbrush package includes not only the electric toothbrush but also a toothpaste foam, a charging dock, a USB charging cable, and a user manual. This comprehensive package adds value for the price. The Magentak comes with a more extensive accessory kit, featuring multiple brush heads (one silicone brush head, one regular brush head, and one interval brush head), a wireless charging dock, and a data cable. This variety may appeal to users who appreciate having different brush heads tailored for various cleaning needs.
Performance and User Experience
In terms of performance, both toothbrushes are designed for effective teeth cleaning and whitening. The FULYA is positioned as an efficient tool that completes a thorough cleaning in a short time, which may be ideal for those with limited time in the mornings. The Magentak claims to provide deeper cleaning due to its higher vibration frequency, potentially offering a more thorough clean. User experience may vary based on individual preferences for cleaning speed and mode selection, but both products have received positive feedback for their cleaning abilities.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, choosing between the FULYA Automatic Toothbrush and the Magentak Ultrasonic U-Shaped Toothbrush comes down to your specific needs. If you prefer a more budget-friendly option that still provides effective cleaning, the FULYA toothbrush at $24.59 may be the right choice. However, if you prioritize longer battery life and a more versatile range of cleaning modes, the Magentak at $29.99 may better suit your lifestyle. Both toothbrushes offer significant benefits, and your final decision should align with your personal preferences for features and usability.

