vsversusfinder

FULYA Automatic Toothbrush with Teeth Whitening vs Mayeec Ultrasonic Toothbrush for Adults, Automatic

Updated August 2026 — Mayeec Ultrasonic Toothbrush for Adults, Automatic leads on battery life and features.

The FULYA Automatic Toothbrush offers better value for money, while the Mayeec Ultrasonic Toothbrush provides additional whitening features.

Why FULYA Automatic Toothbrush with Teeth Whitening is better

Price

FULYA is $24.59, cheaper than Mayeec at $32.19.

Battery Life

FULYA lasts 7 days on a charge.

Sales Rank

FULYA has a better sales rank at 110,906.

Why Mayeec Ultrasonic Toothbrush for Adults, Automatic is better

Whitening Mode

Mayeec includes a dedicated whitening mode.

Charging Time

Mayeec charges in 1.5 hours, faster than FULYA.

Cleaning Speed

Mayeec completes cleaning in 30 seconds.

Overall score

FULYA Automatic Toothbrush with Teeth Whitening
78
Mayeec Ultrasonic Toothbrush for Adults, Automatic
82

Specifications

SpecFULYA Automatic Toothbrush with Teeth WhiteningMayeec Ultrasonic Toothbrush for Adults, Automatic
BrandFULYAMayeec
DesignU-shapeU-shape
MaterialFood-grade siliconeEco-friendly silica gel
WaterproofIPX7IPX7
Modes34

Dimension comparison

FULYA Automatic Toothbrush with Teeth WhiteningMayeec Ultrasonic Toothbrush for Adults, Automatic

Price Comparison

In the price comparison, the FULYA Automatic Toothbrush is significantly cheaper than the Mayeec Ultrasonic Toothbrush. Priced at $24.59, the FULYA model is about 24% less expensive than the Mayeec, which retails for $32.19. This price difference can be a crucial deciding factor for consumers looking for effective dental care solutions without breaking the bank. Given the average price trends, where the FULYA toothbrush has a 90-day price average of $29.48, it remains a cost-effective choice compared to Mayeec's average of $39.41 over the same period.

Design and Usability

Both toothbrushes feature an innovative U-shape design that aims to provide comprehensive mouth coverage and facilitate a more effective cleaning process. The FULYA Automatic Toothbrush offers an ergonomic design that fits the contours of the gums better than traditional toothbrushes, enhancing comfort and efficiency during use. In contrast, the Mayeec model emphasizes a unique design that contours to the bite, allowing it to reach deeper areas than common toothbrushes. While both designs are aimed at maximizing cleaning effectiveness, the choice may come down to personal preference regarding comfort and handling during brushing.

Cleaning Technology

When it comes to cleaning technology, both toothbrushes utilize high-frequency sonic vibrations to enhance their cleaning capabilities. The FULYA toothbrush is particularly efficient, claiming to complete a 360° clean in just 45 seconds. On the other hand, the Mayeec toothbrush also offers comprehensive cleaning but completes its cycle in 30 seconds, making it slightly quicker. Both models provide various modes—strong, medium, and massage—but Mayeec adds an additional whitening mode, enhancing its versatility in promoting dental health and aesthetics.

Battery Life and Charging

Battery life is another critical aspect to consider. The FULYA toothbrush boasts a remarkable battery life, lasting up to one week on a full charge, which takes only three hours. In comparison, the Mayeec toothbrush requires just 1.5 hours to charge and can last for an impressive ten days on a single charge. This longer runtime may appeal to users who travel frequently or prefer a less frequent charging routine. Both toothbrushes utilize USB charging, making them convenient for home and travel use.

Material Quality

Material quality is an essential factor in dental hygiene products, and both brands prioritize safety in their designs. The FULYA toothbrush features a head made of food-grade silicone and an IPX7 waterproof handle, ensuring easy cleaning and durability. The Mayeec toothbrush also utilizes food-grade eco-friendly silica gel and is fully washable, allowing for thorough hygiene maintenance. Both toothbrushes are designed with user safety and comfort in mind, making them suitable for regular use.

Additional Features

In terms of additional features, the FULYA toothbrush comes equipped with a built-in timer that ensures users brush for a sufficient duration, promoting effective cleaning habits. The Mayeec toothbrush, while also featuring a timer, includes a unique whitening mode that employs LED blue light technology to help accelerate stain removal from teeth, offering a more enhanced whitening experience. This added feature may attract users specifically seeking teeth whitening solutions along with their routine cleaning.

Sales Rank and Popularity

Both products have their respective sales ranks, with the FULYA Automatic Toothbrush at 110,906 and the Mayeec Ultrasonic Toothbrush at 119,244. The lower sales rank of the FULYA model suggests that it may be slightly more popular among consumers, potentially reflecting better customer satisfaction or effectiveness. However, both products are relatively new entrants in the market, and their ranks indicate that shoppers are exploring options within the ultrasonic toothbrush category.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the FULYA Automatic Toothbrush and the Mayeec Ultrasonic Toothbrush comes down to your specific needs and preferences. If budget is a primary concern, the FULYA is the more economical option at $24.59, providing solid features and effective cleaning capabilities. Conversely, if you are looking for additional features, particularly a dedicated teeth whitening mode, the Mayeec at $32.19 might be worth the extra investment. Each toothbrush offers unique advantages, making them both strong contenders in the electric toothbrush market.