vsversusfinder

GALAX PRO 710W Mini Circular Saw 3 Pcs Saw Blades vs Makita XSR01Z 36V LXT® Brushless Rear Handle

Updated July 2026 — GALAX PRO 710W Mini Circular Saw 3 Pcs Saw Blades wins on sales rank and max rpm, Makita XSR01Z 36V LXT® Brushless Rear Handle wins on price and weight.

The GALAX PRO is a budget-friendly option for casual users, while the Makita offers superior performance for professionals.

Why GALAX PRO 710W Mini Circular Saw 3 Pcs Saw Blades is better

Price

GALAX PRO is significantly cheaper at $62.99.

Portability

GALAX PRO is compact and lightweight.

User-Friendly

GALAX PRO includes practical accessories for DIY projects.

Why Makita XSR01Z 36V LXT® Brushless Rear Handle is better

Power

Makita has a brushless motor for better efficiency.

Cutting Capacity

Makita can cut deeper at 2-9/16 inches.

Battery Runtime

Makita offers extended runtime with dual battery use.

Overall score

GALAX PRO 710W Mini Circular Saw 3 Pcs Saw Blades
65
Makita XSR01Z 36V LXT® Brushless Rear Handle
85

Specifications

SpecGALAX PRO 710W Mini Circular Saw 3 Pcs Saw BladesMakita XSR01Z 36V LXT® Brushless Rear Handle
Motor TypeBrushedBrushless
Speed ControlNoneAutomatic
Included Blades2None
Dust ExtractionYesNo
User LevelBeginnerProfessional

Dimension comparison

GALAX PRO 710W Mini Circular Saw 3 Pcs Saw BladesMakita XSR01Z 36V LXT® Brushless Rear Handle

Price Comparison

The GALAX PRO 710W Mini Circular Saw is significantly cheaper than the Makita XSR01Z, priced at $62.99 compared to $241.65. This price difference of about 74% makes the GALAX PRO an attractive option for those on a budget or for DIY enthusiasts who may not require the advanced features of the Makita model. While the GALAX PRO is designed for home projects and light materials, the Makita offers professional-grade performance suitable for demanding applications. This price disparity highlights the difference in target audiences, with the GALAX PRO catering to casual users and the Makita aimed at professionals.

Power and Performance

When it comes to power, the Makita XSR01Z outperforms the GALAX PRO with its brushless motor capable of delivering 5,100 RPM compared to the GALAX PRO’s 5,200 RPM. Although the GALAX PRO boasts a slightly higher maximum speed, the Makita’s brushless technology ensures longer runtime and better efficiency. The Makita’s electronic control technology adjusts cutting speed and torque dynamically, maximizing performance during use. For users needing sustained power for extensive cutting tasks, the Makita provides a superior option, particularly for larger projects where consistency is crucial.

Cutting Capacity

In terms of cutting capacity, the Makita XSR01Z excels with a maximum cutting depth of 2-9/16 inches at 90 degrees, allowing it to slice through materials like 2x10 lumber in one pass. The GALAX PRO, on the other hand, offers a cutting depth of 1-2/3 inches at 90 degrees and 1 inch at 45 degrees. This makes the Makita a preferable choice for those who frequently work with thicker materials or require deeper cuts, while the GALAX PRO is more suited for lighter tasks such as cutting wood, plastic, or metal in home improvement projects.

User-Friendly Features

Both the GALAX PRO and Makita models are designed with user-friendly features, but they target different user experiences. The GALAX PRO includes practical accessories such as a dust extraction adapter and a parallel guide for straight cuts, which are beneficial for DIY enthusiasts. Its compact design also makes it easy to handle. In contrast, the Makita features advanced technology like automatic speed change, which adjusts the cutting speed based on the material. This feature enhances efficiency but may be more complex for casual users. Thus, while both saws are user-friendly, the GALAX PRO may appeal more to beginners and hobbyists.

Weight and Portability

The GALAX PRO is designed to be portable and compact, making it easy to handle for small projects. While the specific weight of the GALAX PRO is not provided, it is marketed as a mini circular saw, suggesting it is lightweight and easy to maneuver. The Makita weighs 12.4 pounds when equipped with batteries, which may be heavier than some users prefer for extended use. For those looking for a lightweight solution for simple tasks, the GALAX PRO is likely the better option, whereas the Makita's weight reflects its robust design suited for more demanding work.

Battery and Runtime

The Makita XSR01Z operates on two 18V LXT batteries, providing extended runtime and the flexibility of using batteries across various Makita tools. It offers up to 558 cross-cuts per charge in 2x4 SPF lumber, demonstrating its efficiency in high-demand scenarios. In contrast, the GALAX PRO is an electric saw that does not rely on battery power, which may limit portability. Users who value convenience and battery-operated devices will find the Makita's design a significant advantage, especially for projects that require mobility and reduced downtime due to charging.

Brand Reputation

In terms of brand reputation, Makita is well-regarded for its innovation and quality in the power tool industry, often seen as a professional-grade option. The Makita XSR01Z, with a bestseller rank of 30,684, indicates its popularity among users who require reliable performance. The GALAX PRO, with a sales rank of 93,395, appears to cater to a more casual market. While both brands offer quality products, Makita’s reputation for durability and performance makes it a preferred choice for professionals and serious DIYers.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the GALAX PRO 710W Mini Circular Saw and the Makita XSR01Z ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are a DIY enthusiast looking for an affordable, lightweight saw for simple tasks, the GALAX PRO at $62.99 is an excellent choice. However, if you need a powerful, professional-grade tool capable of handling larger projects with efficiency and durability, the Makita XSR01Z at $241.65 is worth the investment. Each saw has its strengths, making them suitable for different user profiles and applications.