vsversusfinder

Garmin Forerunner 165, Running Smartwatch, vs Oura Ring 4 Charger - Size 12 - Charging Dock and

Updated July 2026 — Garmin Forerunner 165, Running Smartwatch, wins on display and features, Oura Ring 4 Charger - Size 12 - Charging Dock and wins on price and charging.

The Garmin Forerunner 165 is a superior fitness smartwatch with extensive features, while the Oura Ring 4 Charger is a basic charging accessory. Choose based on your needs.

Why Garmin Forerunner 165, Running Smartwatch, is better

Fitness Features

Offers extensive health tracking and training metrics.

Display

Features a vibrant AMOLED touchscreen.

Battery Life

Lasts up to 11 days in smartwatch mode.

Why Oura Ring 4 Charger - Size 12 - Charging Dock and is better

Price

Significantly cheaper than the Garmin.

Charging Speed

Charges the Oura Ring quickly in 20-80 minutes.

Compact Design

Designed specifically for the Oura Ring.

Overall score

Garmin Forerunner 165, Running Smartwatch,
85
Oura Ring 4 Charger - Size 12 - Charging Dock and
55

Specifications

SpecGarmin Forerunner 165, Running Smartwatch,Oura Ring 4 Charger - Size 12 - Charging Dock and
Price$199.99$59.00
Battery Life11 days8 days
Display TypeAMOLEDNone
GPSYesNo
Health TrackingYesNo
Charging TimeN/A20-80 min

Dimension comparison

Garmin Forerunner 165, Running Smartwatch,Oura Ring 4 Charger - Size 12 - Charging Dock and

Overview of Garmin Forerunner 165 and Oura Ring 4 Charger

The Garmin Forerunner 165 is a running smartwatch priced at $199.99, while the Oura Ring 4 Charger is a specialized charging dock available for $59.00. This significant price difference reflects their distinct purposes—one is designed for fitness tracking and training, whereas the other is solely a charging accessory. The Forerunner 165 ranks 225 in sales, indicating its popularity among fitness enthusiasts, while the Oura Ring 4 Charger holds a sales rank of 595.

Design and Display

The Garmin Forerunner 165 features a colorful AMOLED touchscreen display, which enhances the user experience with vibrant visuals and easy navigation. It is lightweight and designed in a 43 mm size, making it comfortable for long-term wear. In contrast, the Oura Ring 4 Charger is a compact device specifically designed to charge the Oura Ring 4. It does not have a display but is tailored to fit the Oura Ring size, ensuring that users have a seamless charging experience. While the Forerunner 165 offers a visually engaging interface, the Oura Ring 4 Charger focuses solely on functionality.

Functionality and Features

The Garmin Forerunner 165 excels in functionality with built-in GPS, wrist-based heart rate monitoring, and over 25 built-in activity profiles, including running, cycling, and strength training. It provides personalized training suggestions and recovery insights, making it a comprehensive tool for athletes. By contrast, the Oura Ring 4 Charger serves a singular purpose—charging the Oura Ring 4. It charges the ring in about 20 to 80 minutes and is essential for users who want to maintain their device’s battery life. The Forerunner 165 offers extensive features for fitness tracking, whereas the Oura Ring 4 Charger is limited to its charging capabilities.

Battery Life and Charging

The Garmin Forerunner 165 boasts an impressive battery life of up to 11 days in smartwatch mode and 19 hours in GPS mode, allowing users to track their activities without frequent recharging. This extended battery life is ideal for those who engage in long training sessions or multi-day events. In contrast, the Oura Ring 4 Charger provides a quick charging solution, capable of fully charging the ring in as little as 20 minutes. However, the Oura Ring itself typically lasts up to 8 days on a full charge, making the charger an essential accessory but not a standalone device for tracking fitness.

Health and Fitness Tracking

The Garmin Forerunner 165 is designed with health and fitness tracking at its core. It offers insights into sleep patterns, recovery, and training effects, helping users gauge their performance and adjust their workouts accordingly. Features like incident detection during outdoor activities increase safety for users. The Oura Ring 4 Charger, however, does not track health metrics itself; it simply facilitates the charging of the Oura Ring, which is known for its advanced health tracking capabilities. Therefore, while both products contribute to health and fitness, the Forerunner 165 does so actively through monitoring and suggestions.

Smart Features and Connectivity

The Garmin Forerunner 165 includes smart notifications, allowing users to receive calls and texts directly on their wrist when paired with a smartphone. This connectivity adds a layer of convenience for those who wish to stay connected during workouts. In contrast, the Oura Ring 4 Charger does not include any smart features; its sole purpose is to charge the Oura Ring. Users of the Oura Ring will need to rely on the ring itself to track notifications and health metrics. Thus, the Forerunner 165 offers a more comprehensive smart experience compared to the Oura Ring 4 Charger.

Price Comparison

The Garmin Forerunner 165 is priced at $199.99, while the Oura Ring 4 Charger is priced at $59.00, making the charger about 70% cheaper than the smartwatch. This price disparity reflects the complex functionalities of the Forerunner 165, which justifies its higher cost compared to the basic charging accessory of the Oura Ring. For consumers on a budget, the Oura Ring 4 Charger may seem more appealing, but it lacks the extensive features offered by the Garmin Forerunner 165.

Which should you buy?

If you are an athlete or fitness enthusiast looking for a comprehensive tool to track your workouts, monitor your health, and receive smart notifications, the Garmin Forerunner 165 is the clear choice. Its advanced features, vibrant display, and long battery life make it a valuable investment for anyone serious about fitness. On the other hand, if you already own an Oura Ring and need a reliable charging solution, the Oura Ring 4 Charger is essential, but it won't provide any tracking capabilities on its own. Ultimately, the decision should be based on your specific needs—fitness tracking versus charging convenience.