Garmin Forerunner 165, Running Smartwatch, vs aeac Smart Watch for Women, Answer/Make Call, 1.32''
Updated July 2026 — Garmin Forerunner 165, Running Smartwatch, wins on brand and tracking, aeac Smart Watch for Women, Answer/Make Call, 1.32'' wins on price and sports modes.
The Garmin Forerunner 165 is ideal for serious athletes, while the Smart Watch for Women is a budget-friendly option for casual users.
Why Garmin Forerunner 165, Running Smartwatch, is better
Advanced Tracking
Offers comprehensive fitness metrics and training insights.
Battery Life
Lasts up to 11 days in smartwatch mode.
Brand Reputation
Garmin is well-regarded in the fitness tracker market.
Why aeac Smart Watch for Women, Answer/Make Call, 1.32'' is better
Price
Significantly cheaper at $59.99.
Sports Modes
Supports 110+ sports modes.
Communication
Clear call quality with AI assistant.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Garmin Forerunner 165, Running Smartwatch, | aeac Smart Watch for Women, Answer/Make Call, 1.32'' |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $199.99 | $59.99 |
| Battery Life | 11 days | 10 days |
| Display Size | 43 mm | 43 mm |
| Heart Rate Monitor | Yes | Yes |
| Water Resistance | No | 3ATM |
Dimension comparison
Design and Display
The Garmin Forerunner 165 features a brilliant AMOLED touchscreen display, while the Smart Watch for Women also boasts a 1.32-inch AMOLED display. The Forerunner 165’s display is designed specifically for outdoor visibility, making it easier to read in bright conditions. With a size of 43 mm, both watches are compact and lightweight, suitable for daily wear. However, the Forerunner 165’s screen is larger and more tailored for fitness enthusiasts, providing a more spacious view of training metrics and notifications.
Health and Fitness Tracking
When it comes to health and fitness tracking, the Garmin Forerunner 165 excels with advanced features like wrist-based heart rate monitoring, sleep analysis, and recovery insights. It offers over 25 built-in activity profiles, catering to a diverse range of fitness activities. In comparison, the Smart Watch for Women tracks vital health metrics such as heart rate, blood oxygen levels, and sleep, but it does not provide the same depth of training insights as the Forerunner 165. The Forerunner 165's comprehensive training metrics can help users optimize their performance, whereas the Smart Watch for Women focuses more on general fitness.
Battery Life
Battery life is a significant consideration for fitness trackers. The Garmin Forerunner 165 offers an impressive battery life of up to 11 days in smartwatch mode and 19 hours in GPS mode. In contrast, the Smart Watch for Women provides about 10 days of usage on a quick 2-hour charge. While both watches have commendable battery longevity, the Forerunner 165 provides slightly longer usage, especially for those who frequently use GPS features for outdoor activities.
Sports Modes
The Garmin Forerunner 165 includes 25+ built-in activity profiles, which can help users track their performance across various sports, including running, cycling, HIIT, and strength training. The Smart Watch for Women, however, supports an impressive 110+ sports modes, appealing to users who engage in a broader array of activities. This makes the Smart Watch for Women a versatile choice for individuals looking to track diverse workouts beyond traditional fitness activities.
Smart Features
Smart features set these two smartwatches apart in functionality. The Garmin Forerunner 165 allows users to receive notifications from paired Android or Apple smartphones, ensuring they stay connected during workouts. It also includes Garmin Pay for contactless payments. On the other hand, the Smart Watch for Women excels in communication, offering clear call quality with high-definition speakers and microphones, along with voice commands. This makes it a suitable option for users who prioritize seamless communication while on the go.
Price
The price difference between these two watches is notable. The Garmin Forerunner 165 is priced at $199.99, while the Smart Watch for Women retails for just $59.99. This makes the Smart Watch for Women about 70% cheaper than the Forerunner 165, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious consumers. However, the price reflects the differing levels of fitness features and capabilities, with the Forerunner 165 designed for serious athletes and the Smart Watch for Women catering to casual users.
Brand Reputation and Ranking
When it comes to brand reputation, Garmin is well-regarded in the fitness tracker market. The Forerunner 165 holds a sales rank of 225, indicating its popularity among fitness enthusiasts. The Smart Watch for Women, produced by AEAC, has a sales rank of 527, suggesting it is a more recent entry in the market with growing recognition. Garmin’s established presence may appeal to buyers seeking reliability and a proven track record in fitness technology.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Garmin Forerunner 165 and the Smart Watch for Women ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you’re a serious runner or athlete seeking comprehensive fitness tracking, advanced metrics, and longer battery life, the Garmin Forerunner 165 is the superior option, despite its higher price of $199.99. However, if you’re looking for a budget-friendly smartwatch that offers basic fitness tracking and smart features like call capabilities, the Smart Watch for Women at $59.99 is an appealing alternative. Each watch serves different user preferences, making the decision dependent on your priorities in features and functionality.

