vsversusfinder

GE Countertop Microwave Oven, 1,150-watt vs Whirlpool WMCS3018RW Countertop

Updated April 2026 — GE Countertop Microwave Oven, 1,150-watt wins on capacity and power, Whirlpool WMCS3018RW Countertop wins on cleaning and value.

Winner
GE Countertop Microwave Oven, 1,150-watt Capacity, 1.6 Cubic Ft., 8 Auto Setting Cooking Settings, Child-Lock Technology, Kitchen Essentials for the Countertop, Dorm Room or Apartment, Stainless Steel$189.00

GE Countertop Microwave Oven, 1,150-watt Capacity, 1.6 Cubic Ft., 8 Auto Setting Cooking Settings, Child-Lock Technology, Kitchen Essentials for the Countertop, Dorm Room or Apartment, Stainless Steel

GE

Whirlpool WMCS3018RW Countertop Microwave with Turntable 0.7 Cu. Ft, Steam Clean, 700 Watt Microwave, White$128.86

Whirlpool WMCS3018RW Countertop Microwave with Turntable 0.7 Cu. Ft, Steam Clean, 700 Watt Microwave, White

Whirlpool

The GE Countertop Microwave Oven offers superior cooking capacity and power output compared to the Whirlpool WMCS3018RW. While the Whirlpool model provides a lower price point and specialized cleaning features, the GE unit is better suited for households requiring higher wattage and larger interior space for varied cookware.

Why GE Countertop Microwave Oven, 1,150-watt is better

Higher Power Output

GE provides 1,150 watts of power for faster cooking

Larger Interior Capacity

GE offers 1.6 Cu. Ft. versus 0.7 Cu. Ft.

Advanced Sensor Cooking

GE automatically adjusts time and power via sensors

Dedicated Child Lock

GE includes a mandatory two-step child lock feature

Why Whirlpool WMCS3018RW Countertop is better

Lower Purchase Price

Whirlpool is priced at $128.86 compared to $189.00

Steam Clean Function

Whirlpool includes a specific steam clean mode for messes

Dishwasher-Safe Plate

Whirlpool turntable plate is dishwasher-safe for easy cleaning

Compact Footprint

Whirlpool 0.7 Cu. Ft. size fits smaller kitchen spaces

Overall score

GE Countertop Microwave Oven, 1,150-watt
86
Whirlpool WMCS3018RW Countertop
78

Specifications

SpecGE Countertop Microwave Oven, 1,150-wattWhirlpool WMCS3018RW Countertop
BrandGEWhirlpool
Price$189.00$128.86
Power Output1,150 watts
Capacity1.6 Cu. Ft.0.7 Cu. Ft.
Turntable TypeGlass turntableDishwasher-Safe Turntable Plate
Express ControlsInstant On express cooking controls4 Express Buttons
Special FeaturesSensor Cooking ControlsSteam Clean
Child LockTwo-Step Child Lock

Dimension comparison

GE Countertop Microwave Oven, 1,150-wattWhirlpool WMCS3018RW Countertop

Design and build quality

The GE Countertop Microwave Oven presents a design focused on balancing power with a footprint that does not consume excessive kitchen space. Despite being described as compact yet powerful, the unit maintains a substantial internal volume. The construction includes a glass turntable that rotates to ensure optimum cooking distribution. In contrast, the Whirlpool WMCS3018RW Countertop model emphasizes fitting essentials into a smaller form factor. Its design accommodates day-to-day essentials within a 0.7 Cu. Ft. capacity. Both units feature countertop configurations, but the GE model leans towards performance-oriented build qualities while the Whirlpool focuses on compact utility and ease of maintenance through its dishwasher-safe components.

Capacity and interior space

Interior capacity is a significant differentiator between these two appliances. The GE model provides 1.6 Cu. Ft. of inside space, which allows for effective and efficient cooking of larger dishes or multiple items simultaneously. This volume supports the rotation of the glass turntable for even heating. The Whirlpool unit offers 0.7 Cu. Ft. capacity, which is designed to accommodate essential items rather than large cookware. Users requiring space for family-sized meals or larger casserole dishes will find the GE interior more accommodating. The smaller capacity of the Whirlpool model makes it suitable for offices, dormitories, or kitchens with limited counter space where large items are rarely heated.

Cooking power and performance

Performance in microwaves is largely dictated by wattage and cooking modes. The GE Countertop Microwave Oven delivers 1,150 watts of power, enabling rapid heating and cooking times. This high wattage supports the sensor cooking controls that automatically adjust time and power for delicious cooking results. The Whirlpool model does not specify wattage in the provided data, though its smaller capacity suggests a lower power output typical of compact units. The GE unit also features weight and time defrost, allowing users to enter food weight for optimal defrosting settings. The Whirlpool relies on auto functions for defrosting and reheating, which provides convenience but may lack the precision of weight-based settings found in the GE model.

Control panel and usability

Both microwaves prioritize convenient controls for daily operation. The GE unit features simple, one-touch operation with Instant On express cooking controls. It includes multiple cooking modes, a kitchen timer, and cooking complete alarms to add convenience to the user experience. The Whirlpool model offers a variety of automatic cooking modes through its Auto Functions, allowing users to reheat, defrost, or keep dishes warm without manual calculation. It also includes 4 Express Buttons to get cooking quickly and efficiently without the need to type in a time. Both interfaces are designed for straightforward interaction, though the GE provides specific alarms and timer functions that may appeal to users who monitor cooking times closely.

Safety and child lock features

Safety features are critical in households with younger family members. The GE Countertop Microwave Oven includes a Two-Step Child Lock as a mandatory feature. This helps prevent unintended use by children, with the option to deactivate it if not needed. This specific security measure is highlighted as a key component of the GE design. The provided data for the Whirlpool WMCS3018RW does not specify a child lock mechanism. For families prioritizing safety controls to prevent accidental operation or settings changes by children, the GE model offers a verified advantage with its dedicated lock system.

Cleaning and maintenance

Maintenance and cleaning capabilities differ notably between the two units. The Whirlpool WMCS3018RW includes a Steam Clean feature where users add a bowl of water and press Steam Clean to help lift messes, which are then wiped away with a damp cloth. Additionally, it features a dishwasher-safe turntable plate, allowing customers to easily clean up spills by putting the turntable in the dishwasher. The GE model utilizes a glass turntable but does not specify dishwasher safety or steam cleaning capabilities in the provided data. Users who prioritize hassle-free solutions to everyday messes and easy component washing may find the Whirlpool maintenance features more aligned with their needs.

Price and value proposition

Price is a major factor in the value proposition of these appliances. The Whirlpool WMCS3018RW is listed at $128.86, which is significantly lower than the GE Countertop Microwave Oven priced at $189.00. The lower price point of the Whirlpool model makes it an accessible option for budget-conscious buyers or those needing a secondary microwave. The GE model commands a higher price, justified by its higher wattage, larger capacity, and sensor cooking technology. Value depends on user priorities; those needing performance will find value in the GE, while those seeking cost savings and cleaning features will find value in the Whirlpool.

Which one should you buy?

Choosing between these models depends on your specific kitchen requirements and cooking habits. If you require high power output of 1,150 watts and a large 1.6 Cu. Ft. capacity for family meals, the GE Countertop Microwave Oven is the superior choice. It also offers better safety features with its child lock. However, if you have limited counter space, need a dishwasher-safe turntable, prefer steam cleaning assistance, and want to save money, the Whirlpool WMCS3018RW is the practical option. The GE wins on performance and capacity, while the Whirlpool wins on price and cleaning convenience.