Profile GE Profile PCHK11S1WSS 1.1 Cu Ft Countertop vs Whirlpool WMCS3018RW Countertop Microwave with
Updated August 2026 — Profile GE Profile PCHK11S1WSS 1.1 Cu Ft Countertop wins on capacity and power, Whirlpool WMCS3018RW Countertop Microwave with wins on price and cleaning.
The GE Profile PCHK11S1WSS offers advanced features and larger capacity, making it a superior choice for tech-savvy users, while the Whirlpool WMCS3018RW is a budget-friendly option for basic needs.
Why Profile GE Profile PCHK11S1WSS 1.1 Cu Ft Countertop is better
Advanced Features
Includes Wi-Fi and sensor cooking
Larger Capacity
1.1 cu. ft. vs 0.7 cu. ft.
Higher Power
800 watts vs 700 watts
Why Whirlpool WMCS3018RW Countertop Microwave with is better
Lower Price
$128.86 vs $467.00
Ease of Cleaning
Steam Clean feature
Compact Size
Better for small spaces
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Profile GE Profile PCHK11S1WSS 1.1 Cu Ft Countertop | Whirlpool WMCS3018RW Countertop Microwave with |
|---|---|---|
| Cooking Power | 800W | 700W |
| Capacity | 1.1 Cu Ft | 0.7 Cu Ft |
| Wi-Fi Enabled | Yes | No |
| Steam Clean | No | Yes |
| Turntable | No | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the GE Profile PCHK11S1WSS and Whirlpool WMCS3018RW
The GE Profile PCHK11S1WSS is a more advanced microwave option, featuring Wi-Fi connectivity and sensor cooking technology. In contrast, the Whirlpool WMCS3018RW offers essential features at a lower price point. While the GE Profile is priced at $467.00, the Whirlpool comes in at just $128.86, making it about 73% cheaper. This price difference highlights the contrasting target demographics of these two models, with the GE Profile aimed at tech-savvy users and the Whirlpool appealing to those seeking simplicity.
Design and Capacity
When it comes to design, the GE Profile PCHK11S1WSS boasts a modern stainless-steel finish, adding a sleek appearance to any kitchen. Its 1.1 cu. ft. capacity allows for larger dishes compared to the Whirlpool WMCS3018RW’s 0.7 cu. ft. capacity. The larger size of the GE Profile enables it to accommodate more extensive meal preparations, while the Whirlpool’s compact design makes it suitable for smaller spaces or for users who only need a microwave for basic tasks. Overall, if aesthetics and capacity are significant factors for you, the GE Profile stands out.
Cooking Power and Performance
The GE Profile PCHK11S1WSS operates at 800 watts, offering more cooking power than the Whirlpool WMCS3018RW, which operates at 700 watts. This 100-watt difference may not seem substantial, but it translates to faster cooking times and more efficient heating in the GE Profile. The GE Profile also features sensor cooking technology, which adjusts cooking times based on the food being prepared, providing a level of convenience that the Whirlpool lacks. For users focused on performance and efficiency, the GE Profile is the clear choice.
Convenience Features
In terms of convenience, the GE Profile PCHK11S1WSS outshines the Whirlpool WMCS3018RW. With its Wi-Fi connectivity, users can manage cooking times and settings via their smartphones or smart devices. The Scan-to-Cook feature allows for easy preparation of frozen meals by scanning barcodes. On the other hand, the Whirlpool offers basic automatic cooking modes and an Express Button for quick access, but it does not provide the same high-tech features. For tech enthusiasts, the GE Profile’s advanced features will make daily cooking tasks much easier.
Cleaning and Maintenance
Cleaning and maintenance are essential considerations for any kitchen appliance. The Whirlpool WMCS3018RW includes a Steam Clean feature, which simplifies the cleaning process by allowing users to add water and steam away messes. Additionally, its turntable plate is dishwasher-safe, making cleanup convenient. The GE Profile does not mention a specific cleaning feature, but its modern design may require more careful maintenance to keep it looking pristine. If ease of cleaning is a priority, the Whirlpool offers a more straightforward solution.
Price Comparison
The price difference between these two microwaves is significant. The GE Profile PCHK11S1WSS is priced at $467.00, while the Whirlpool WMCS3018RW is available for $128.86. This makes the Whirlpool about 73% cheaper than the GE Profile. While the higher price of the GE Profile can be justified by its advanced features and larger capacity, budget-conscious consumers might find the Whirlpool to be a more practical choice, especially for basic microwave needs.
Sales Rank and Popularity
In terms of sales, the GE Profile PCHK11S1WSS holds a bestseller rank of 17,302, while the Whirlpool WMCS3018RW has a slightly lower rank at 17,835. Although both models are well-regarded, the GE Profile’s higher sales rank indicates a slightly stronger market interest. Consumers may prefer the GE Profile for its innovative features, but the Whirlpool remains popular among those looking for a straightforward microwave solution.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the GE Profile PCHK11S1WSS and the Whirlpool WMCS3018RW comes down to your specific needs and budget. If you seek advanced features, larger capacity, and modern technology, the GE Profile is worth the investment. However, if you prefer a basic microwave that covers essential functions at a significantly lower price—about 73% cheaper—the Whirlpool is a sensible option. Assess your cooking habits, kitchen space, and budget to determine which microwave aligns best with your lifestyle.

