vsversusfinder

GMKtec M3 Ultra Mini PC with Intel Core i7 12700H , vs KAMRUI Pinova P2 Mini PC

Updated July 2026 — GMKtec M3 Ultra Mini PC with Intel Core i7 12700H , leads on performance and graphics.

The GMKtec M3 Ultra Mini PC offers superior performance and graphics capabilities, making it the better choice for power users, while the KAMRUI Pinova P2 is a more budget-friendly option for everyday tasks.

Why GMKtec M3 Ultra Mini PC with Intel Core i7 12700H , is better

Performance

Intel Core i7 12700H vs AMD Ryzen 4300U

Graphics

Intel Iris Xe Graphics vs AMD Radeon

Memory Expansion

Supports up to 64GB RAM vs fixed 16GB

Why KAMRUI Pinova P2 Mini PC is better

Price

$389.99 vs $599.99

Sales Rank

Rank 293 vs Rank 757

Energy Efficiency

Lower TDP for everyday tasks

Overall score

GMKtec M3 Ultra Mini PC with Intel Core i7 12700H ,
85
KAMRUI Pinova P2 Mini PC
70

Specifications

SpecGMKtec M3 Ultra Mini PC with Intel Core i7 12700H ,KAMRUI Pinova P2 Mini PC
ProcessorIntel Core i7 12700HAMD Ryzen 4300U
Cores/Threads14C/20T4C/4T
Max Clock4.7 GHz3.7 GHz
RAM16GB DDR416GB LPDDR4
Storage512GB SSD512GB SSD
GraphicsIntel Iris XeAMD Radeon

Dimension comparison

GMKtec M3 Ultra Mini PC with Intel Core i7 12700H ,KAMRUI Pinova P2 Mini PC

Performance Comparison

When it comes to performance, the GMKtec M3 Ultra Mini PC significantly outshines the KAMRUI Pinova P2 Mini PC. The M3 Ultra is powered by an Intel Core i7 12700H processor, boasting 14 cores and 20 threads, with a maximum turbo frequency of 4.7 GHz. In contrast, the KAMRUI Pinova P2 features an AMD Ryzen 4300U processor with 4 cores and 4 threads, reaching up to 3.7 GHz. This difference means that the GMKtec M3 Ultra is better suited for demanding applications, multitasking, and gaming, making it an ideal choice for power users.

Graphics Capabilities

The GMKtec M3 Ultra Mini PC has an edge in graphics capabilities, featuring Intel Iris Xe Graphics that support seamless multi-display setups. The M3 Ultra allows for triple 4K display output, which is critical for professionals requiring extensive screen space for productivity. Meanwhile, the KAMRUI Pinova P2 incorporates integrated AMD Radeon graphics, also supporting triple 4K displays. However, the graphics performance of the M3 Ultra is generally regarded as superior, providing a smoother experience for demanding graphical tasks and better video conferencing.

Memory and Storage

In terms of memory and storage, both mini PCs come with 16GB of RAM and 512GB of SSD storage. However, the GMKtec M3 Ultra offers more flexibility with memory expansion, supporting up to 64GB of RAM, while the KAMRUI Pinova P2 is limited to its built-in memory. Both devices allow for storage expansion up to 4TB, with the M3 Ultra also supporting a second M.2 SATA drive. This means that while they start similarly, the M3 Ultra offers greater potential for future upgrades, making it a more scalable option for users with high storage needs.

Connectivity Options

Connectivity is critical for modern computing, and the GMKtec M3 Ultra Mini PC excels in this area with its support for WiFi 6 and Bluetooth 5.2. These features provide faster wireless connections, making it ideal for high-speed internet access and seamless device pairing. The KAMRUI Pinova P2 also includes WiFi and Bluetooth, but lacks the newer standards that enhance performance. Additionally, both devices offer multiple ports for connecting peripherals, including USB-C and HDMI options, but the M3 Ultra's advanced connectivity options could enhance overall productivity.

Design and Size

Both the GMKtec M3 Ultra and KAMRUI Pinova P2 are designed as compact mini PCs, making them suitable for home or office environments where space is limited. The GMKtec M3 Ultra, however, packs more power into a similarly-sized form factor, demonstrating that small size doesn’t necessarily mean sacrificing performance. This design advantage makes the M3 Ultra a better choice for users looking for a powerful yet space-saving desktop solution.

Price Consideration

The pricing of these mini PCs reflects their performance capabilities. The GMKtec M3 Ultra is priced at $599.99, which is about 54% more expensive than the KAMRUI Pinova P2, which costs $389.99. While the M3 Ultra offers superior specs and performance, budget-conscious users might find the KAMRUI Pinova P2 to be a more suitable choice for everyday tasks and basic office applications without the need for high-end performance.

Bestselling Rankings

The GMKtec M3 Ultra holds a sales rank of 757, while the KAMRUI Pinova P2 is ranked at 293, indicating that the KAMRUI model is more popular among consumers. This could suggest that the Pinova P2 meets the needs of a larger audience, possibly due to its lower price and adequate performance for general use. However, the performance differences should not be overlooked when considering the intended use of the mini PCs.

Which should you buy?

In conclusion, your choice between the GMKtec M3 Ultra Mini PC and the KAMRUI Pinova P2 Mini PC should be driven by your specific needs and budget. If you require top-tier performance, especially for gaming or intensive tasks, the GMKtec M3 Ultra is the clear winner, despite its higher price. However, if you are looking for an economical option for everyday tasks, the KAMRUI Pinova P2 offers a compelling balance of performance and affordability. Ultimately, both mini PCs have their strengths, making them suitable for different user profiles.