vsversusfinder

Greenworks 40V 16" Cordless Lawn Mower vs Scotts 18-Inch 7-Blade Push Manual Reel Lawn Mower

Updated July 2026 — Greenworks 40V 16" Cordless Lawn Mower wins on noise level and runtime, Scotts 18-Inch 7-Blade Push Manual Reel Lawn Mower wins on weight and cutting width.

The Greenworks mower excels in ease of use and advanced features, making it the better choice for most users. The Scotts mower is a budget-friendly option for those who prefer manual operation.

Why Greenworks 40V 16" Cordless Lawn Mower is better

Ease of Use

Push-button start and lightweight design make it user-friendly.

Performance

Gas-like efficiency with a 40-minute runtime.

Maintenance

Zero maintenance with no gas or oil needed.

Why Scotts 18-Inch 7-Blade Push Manual Reel Lawn Mower is better

Price

Significantly cheaper at $149.99.

Eco-Friendly

No electricity or fuel required.

Durability

Quality heat-treated alloy steel blades.

Overall score

Greenworks 40V 16" Cordless Lawn Mower
85
Scotts 18-Inch 7-Blade Push Manual Reel Lawn Mower
70

Specifications

SpecGreenworks 40V 16" Cordless Lawn MowerScotts 18-Inch 7-Blade Push Manual Reel Lawn Mower
Power SourceBatteryManual
Cutting System2-in-1Reel
Blade Count17
Height Range1.25-3.375"1-3"
AssemblyEasyEasy

Dimension comparison

Greenworks 40V 16" Cordless Lawn MowerScotts 18-Inch 7-Blade Push Manual Reel Lawn Mower

Design and Build Quality

The design and build quality differ significantly between the Greenworks 40V 16" Cordless Lawn Mower and the Scotts 18-Inch 7-Blade Push Manual Reel Lawn Mower. The Greenworks mower features an ultra-lightweight design, making it 35% lighter than traditional models, which enhances maneuverability and ease of storage. With a 16-inch cutting deck and ergonomic handles, it is ideal for users seeking comfort during operation. In contrast, the Scotts mower, while not powered by electricity, has an 18-inch cutting width and a 7-blade ball bearing reel. This design allows for a clean and even cut, but it requires more physical effort due to its manual operation.

Performance and Efficiency

When comparing performance, the Greenworks mower offers gas-like efficiency with a 40-minute runtime powered by a 4.0Ah battery. This feature is perfect for small to medium lawns, allowing users to mow without interruption. On the other hand, the Scotts mower delivers a mechanical, human-powered performance that is effective but entirely reliant on user effort. While it doesn't provide the same ease of use as the Greenworks mower, it does allow for more control over the cutting process, which can result in a healthier lawn due to its cutting technique.

Cutting Capabilities

The cutting capabilities of both mowers are tailored to different user needs. The Greenworks mower has a 2-in-1 mulching and rear-bagging system, adapting easily to various grass types with a single-lever height control system that adjusts between 1.25 inches to 3.375 inches. This flexibility makes it suitable for diverse lawn conditions. In contrast, the Scotts mower features an adjustable cutting height from 1 inch to 3 inches, which, while effective, offers less range. Its 7-blade design ensures a precise cut, but users may find the Greenworks mower's options more accommodating for different mowing styles.

Environmental Impact

The environmental impact is another critical aspect where the Greenworks mower shines. It operates without gas or oil, contributing to zero emissions and promoting a cleaner environment. This model not only saves on gas costs but also reduces maintenance needs, which can amount to over $200 annually compared to gas mowers. Conversely, the Scotts manual mower operates without any fuel or electricity, making it inherently eco-friendly. However, it requires physical exertion, which may not be feasible for all users, especially in larger yards.

Price and Value

In terms of pricing, the Greenworks mower is priced at $279.99, whereas the Scotts mower is significantly cheaper at $149.99, making it about 46% less expensive. However, the Greenworks mower offers more features, including a battery and charger, which adds to its overall value. Users who prioritize convenience and advanced features may find the higher price of the Greenworks mower justified, while those looking for a basic, budget-friendly option might prefer the Scotts model.

Ease of Use

Ease of use is a crucial factor when selecting a lawn mower. The Greenworks mower boasts a push-button start and lightweight design, making it incredibly user-friendly, particularly for those who may struggle with the physical demands of a manual mower. In contrast, the Scotts mower requires physical effort to operate, which can be a disadvantage for users with mobility issues or those who prefer a more effortless mowing experience. Although the Scotts mower is easy to assemble and maneuver, it cannot match the convenience of the Greenworks model.

Maintenance and Longevity

Maintenance requirements vary significantly between the two mowers. The Greenworks mower is marketed as a zero-maintenance option, eliminating the need for gas, oil, and engine tune-ups, while the Scotts mower, being mechanical, requires regular upkeep such as blade sharpening. The Greenworks model also comes with a three-year warranty for both the tool and the battery, providing peace of mind regarding longevity and performance. The Scotts mower, while durable, does not offer a similar warranty, which could be a consideration for long-term use.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Greenworks 40V 16" Cordless Lawn Mower and the Scotts 18-Inch 7-Blade Push Manual Reel Lawn Mower ultimately depends on individual preferences and needs. If you prioritize ease of use, advanced features, and a cleaner mowing experience, the Greenworks mower is the superior choice despite its higher price. However, if budget constraints and a preference for manual operation are your primary considerations, the Scotts mower offers a cost-effective solution with decent performance for smaller lawns. Each mower has its unique strengths, making them suitable for different types of users.