vsversusfinder

Greenworks 60V 10" Brushless Cordless Pole Saw, vs Husqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw, 38-cc,

Updated August 2026 — Greenworks 60V 10" Brushless Cordless Pole Saw, wins on maintenance and reach, Husqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw, 38-cc, wins on safety and power.

The Greenworks pole saw offers better usability and lower maintenance, making it a more appealing choice for homeowners. The Husqvarna chainsaw provides robust power but at a higher cost.

Why Greenworks 60V 10" Brushless Cordless Pole Saw, is better

Price

Greenworks is $40 cheaper

Usability

Push-button start enhances ease of use

Maintenance

No gas or oil changes required

Why Husqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw, 38-cc, is better

Power

Husqvarna has a more powerful gas engine

Cutting Speed

Husqvarna's engine provides high torque

Safety

Inertia-activated chain brake for added safety

Overall score

Greenworks 60V 10" Brushless Cordless Pole Saw,
85
Husqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw, 38-cc,
75

Specifications

SpecGreenworks 60V 10" Brushless Cordless Pole Saw,Husqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw, 38-cc,
Engine TypeBrushlessGas
Bar Length10 inches14 inches
Battery Life120 cutsN/A
Recharge Time40 minsN/A
Chain BrakeNoYes

Dimension comparison

Greenworks 60V 10" Brushless Cordless Pole Saw,Husqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw, 38-cc,

Overview

When comparing the Greenworks 60V 10" Brushless Cordless Pole Saw and the Husqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw, it's essential to evaluate their key features, usability, and performance. The Greenworks model is priced at $179.99, making it about 17% cheaper than the Husqvarna, which retails for $219.99. This price difference sets the stage for a comparison that highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each tool.

Power and Performance

The Greenworks pole saw offers performance equivalent to a 21cc gas engine, achieving chain speeds of up to 43 ft/s and 6,823 rpm. In contrast, the Husqvarna 120 Mark III features a more traditional 38-cc X-Torq engine, which provides powerful torque and efficiency for cutting tasks. While both tools deliver solid power, the Greenworks model's brushless motor technology provides fade-free performance, which can be advantageous for prolonged use without power loss.

Design and Usability

The Greenworks pole saw is designed with a three-piece aluminum shaft that extends to a reach of 14.5 feet, facilitating high cuts without the need for a ladder. Its lightweight design and push-button start enhance usability, particularly for homeowners who may not be experienced with more complex machinery. Conversely, the Husqvarna chainsaw is built with a 14-inch bar and features a lightweight construction that appeals to homeowners seeking a simple yet effective cutting tool. However, it lacks the extended reach of the Greenworks model, which may limit its versatility for high branches.

Cutting Efficiency

In terms of cutting efficiency, the Greenworks pole saw can make up to 120 cuts on a single charge using its 2.0 Ah 60V battery, which recharges fully in 40 minutes. This rapid recharge time and substantial cut capacity make it ideal for quick jobs. The Husqvarna chainsaw, while effective for wood cutting and tree pruning, does not provide specific battery life since it operates on gas, which could be a drawback for users seeking a no-hassle experience without the need to refuel frequently.

Safety Features

Safety is a critical aspect of any cutting tool, and both models incorporate essential safety features. The Husqvarna 120 Mark III includes an inertia-activated chain brake, which enhances safety during operation. This is crucial for preventing accidents. The Greenworks pole saw, while lacking a specific chain brake feature, compensates with its push-button start and a shoulder strap for added comfort and stability during use. Users who prioritize safety may find the Husqvarna's chain brake particularly reassuring.

Maintenance and Longevity

The Greenworks pole saw is designed for low maintenance, as it does not require gas or oil changes, making it an appealing option for those who prefer a more straightforward upkeep routine. Its compatibility with over 75 60V Greenworks products also means users can invest in a battery system that works across multiple tools. In contrast, the Husqvarna chainsaw employs Air Injection technology to clean the air filter, extending engine life by preventing dirt buildup. However, gas engines generally require more maintenance compared to electric models, which may involve more frequent servicing.

Brand Reputation and Sales Rank

When looking at brand reputation, both Greenworks and Husqvarna have established themselves as reliable manufacturers in the outdoor power equipment market. The Greenworks pole saw ranks 14,256 in sales, indicating a solid presence among consumers. The Husqvarna 120 Mark III, with a sales rank of 27,897, suggests it's a popular choice, but not as highly sought after as the Greenworks model. This could reflect consumer preferences for electric tools over gas-powered options in today's market.

Price Comparison

The Greenworks 60V pole saw is priced at $179.99, while the Husqvarna 120 Mark III comes in at $219.99. This price difference of $40 makes the Greenworks model a more budget-friendly option, especially for homeowners who may not need the additional power of a gas chainsaw. For those looking for efficient cutting without the commitment to gas maintenance, the Greenworks option offers significant savings while still delivering excellent performance.

Which should you buy?

In conclusion, the choice between the Greenworks 60V 10" Brushless Cordless Pole Saw and the Husqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw largely depends on your specific needs. If you prioritize convenience, extended reach, and a lower maintenance routine, the Greenworks pole saw is the better option at $179.99. However, if you require robust power and are comfortable with gas maintenance, the Husqvarna chainsaw may be worth considering despite its higher price of $219.99. Ultimately, both tools provide solid performance, but the Greenworks model’s advantages in usability and cost-effectiveness make it a compelling choice for most homeowners.