Ubroo Hand-held Hair Removal Device IPL at Home Hair vs MLAY T14A Hair Removal Device, 0.5s/flash, 20J
Updated August 2026 — MLAY T14A Hair Removal Device, 0.5s/flash, 20J leads on speed and cooling system.
The Ubroo Hand-held Hair Removal Device offers a budget-friendly option with essential features, while the MLAY T14A provides advanced capabilities for a more professional experience.
Why Ubroo Hand-held Hair Removal Device IPL at Home Hair is better
price
Ubroo is $75 cheaper than MLAY
simplicity
Ubroo has a straightforward design for easy use
sales rank
Ubroo is currently more popular with a better sales rank
Why MLAY T14A Hair Removal Device, 0.5s/flash, 20J is better
features
MLAY includes an ice-cooling system for comfort
efficiency
MLAY promises quicker results in 4-8 weeks
energy output
MLAY has a higher energy output of 9-17 joules
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Ubroo Hand-held Hair Removal Device IPL at Home Hair | MLAY T14A Hair Removal Device, 0.5s/flash, 20J |
|---|---|---|
| Cooling | No | Yes |
| Usage | Body & Face | Body + Bikini + Face |
| Flash Modes | 1 | 2 |
| Pain Level | Low | Low |
| Control | Finger Switch | Manual/Auto |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Products
The Ubroo Hand-held Hair Removal Device is priced at $109.99, making it about 41% cheaper than the MLAY T14A Hair Removal Device, which retails for $185.00. Both products are designed for at-home hair removal, utilizing Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) technology, but they offer different features that may appeal to various users.
The Ubroo model is designed for ease of use, allowing for hair reduction on both body and face areas without the need for cutting or pulling. In contrast, the MLAY T14A boasts advanced features like a cooling system and multiple energy levels, aiming for a more efficient hair removal experience.
Design and Usability
The Ubroo Hand-held Hair Removal Device focuses on simplicity and functionality. It is powered by an external adapter and features a finger switch for IPL emission activation. This design allows users to easily control the device while providing a comfortable grip. The coverage area of 3.0 cm² is suitable for various hair removal tasks.
On the other hand, the MLAY T14A Hair Removal Device offers a more sophisticated design with an output spot area of 3.9 cm², which can potentially reduce treatment time. It also includes an ice-cooling system that users can toggle on or off, enhancing comfort during use. The MLAY’s two flash modes (manual and auto) cater to both small and large areas, adding versatility to its usability.
Effectiveness
When it comes to effectiveness, the Ubroo device operates on the same IPL technology used in professional settings but is tailored for home use. While it effectively reduces hair growth with minimal pain, it does not specify a timeline for visible results.
In comparison, the MLAY T14A promises quicker results, with users potentially seeing noticeable effects in just 4 to 8 weeks. The higher energy output of 9-17 joules is designed to enhance the efficiency of hair removal, making it potentially more effective than other lower energy devices. This emphasis on speed and power could appeal to those looking for faster results.
Comfort Features
Comfort is an important consideration in hair removal devices, and both products approach this in different ways. The Ubroo Hand-held Hair Removal Device minimizes discomfort by avoiding cutting or pulling and is designed to work below the skin's surface. However, it lacks specific comfort-enhancing features.
In contrast, the MLAY T14A Hair Removal Device stands out with its ice-cooling system, which can be activated or deactivated as needed. This feature is particularly beneficial for users who may be sensitive to heat during the hair removal process. The ability to adjust the cooling function could make the MLAY a more appealing choice for those concerned about discomfort.
Price Comparison
With the Ubroo priced at $109.99 and the MLAY at $185.00, the Ubroo represents a significant savings of about $75, making it a more budget-friendly option. Additionally, looking at the price average over the last 90 days shows that the Ubroo has fluctuated around $75.70, indicating potential for price sensitivity.
While the MLAY may be more expensive, its advanced features, such as the ice-cooling system and higher energy levels, might justify the cost for some users. Those who prioritize budget over features may find the Ubroo to be the more attractive option.
Target Audience
The Ubroo Hand-held Hair Removal Device is targeted towards individuals looking for an easy-to-use, cost-effective solution for hair removal at home. Its straightforward design makes it suitable for both men and women who want to manage unwanted hair without undergoing more invasive procedures.
Conversely, the MLAY T14A is tailored for users seeking a more professional-grade experience at home. With its advanced features and quicker results, it may appeal to those who have previously used hair removal devices and are looking for enhanced performance. This device may also attract users who are willing to invest more for added comfort and effectiveness.
Sales Performance
In terms of sales performance, the Ubroo has a bestseller rank of 114,445, while the MLAY T14A ranks at 213,013. This indicates that the Ubroo is currently more popular among consumers, potentially due to its lower price point and effective marketing.
However, sales rank alone does not determine quality; it merely reflects consumer preference at a given moment. The MLAY's advanced features may lead to increased popularity over time, especially as users seek more efficient solutions for hair removal.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Ubroo Hand-held Hair Removal Device and the MLAY T14A Hair Removal Device ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for a cost-effective solution with reliable performance, the Ubroo at $109.99 is a solid choice. It provides essential features for effective hair removal without added complexity.
However, if you prioritize advanced features such as a cooling system and faster results, the MLAY T14A at $185.00 may be worth the investment. Its higher energy output and versatility can offer a more streamlined experience, especially for those who frequently engage in hair removal. In conclusion, both devices have their strengths, and the best choice will depend on individual preferences and requirements.

