HEAD Metallix Attitude Pro White Tennis Racket - vs HEAD Ti. Conquest Tennis Racquet – Nano Titanium
Updated August 2026 — HEAD Metallix Attitude Pro White Tennis Racket - wins on control and maneuverability, HEAD Ti. Conquest Tennis Racquet – Nano Titanium wins on forgiveness and weight.
The HEAD Metallix Attitude Pro offers superior performance for experienced players, while the HEAD Ti. Conquest is a budget-friendly choice for beginners.
Why HEAD Metallix Attitude Pro White Tennis Racket - is better
performance
better control and stability for advanced players
features
advanced Metallix technology enhances playability
weight
provides a balanced feel for experienced players
Why HEAD Ti. Conquest Tennis Racquet – Nano Titanium is better
price
significantly cheaper option for beginners
head size
oversized head offers a larger sweet spot
lightweight
easier to handle for new players
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | HEAD Metallix Attitude Pro White Tennis Racket - | HEAD Ti. Conquest Tennis Racquet – Nano Titanium |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $64.33 | $24.99 |
| Sales Rank | 71881 | 7713 |
| Material | Metallix Composite | Titanium |
| String Pattern | 16x19 | 16x19 |
| Pre-Strung | Yes | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The HEAD Ti. Conquest Tennis Racquet is significantly cheaper than the HEAD Metallix Attitude Pro, making it a more budget-friendly option. Priced at $24.99, the Ti. Conquest is about 61% less expensive than the Metallix Attitude Pro, which retails for $64.33. For beginners or recreational players who are just starting their tennis journey, the more affordable option could allow them to invest in other necessary equipment or lessons. The stark price difference could influence a new player's decision, particularly if they are still unsure about their long-term commitment to the sport.
Target Audience
The HEAD Metallix Attitude Pro is designed for more experienced players, focusing on control and maneuverability, while the HEAD Ti. Conquest caters primarily to beginners and recreational players. The Metallix Attitude Pro’s advanced features and performance-oriented design make it suitable for those looking to improve their game. In contrast, the Ti. Conquest’s lightweight construction and oversized head are tailored specifically for players developing their skills, providing an easier learning curve. This distinction is critical for buyers as they consider their current skill levels and future aspirations in tennis.
Construction and Technology
In terms of construction, the HEAD Metallix Attitude Pro utilizes Metallix technologies for a lightweight yet durable frame that enhances performance and stability. The Ti. Conquest, on the other hand, features a lightweight O-Beam design coupled with durable titanium technology. Both racquets aim to provide a blend of strength and maneuverability, but the advanced materials in the Metallix Attitude Pro may offer a more refined playing experience. This difference in construction could impact how players feel during play, especially in terms of stability and power.
Head Size and Balance
The head sizes of these two racquets differ significantly, impacting their playability. The HEAD Metallix Attitude Pro features a standard 100 square inch head, which balances control and power, making it ideal for intermediate to advanced players. In contrast, the Ti. Conquest boasts an oversized 108 square inch head that provides a larger sweet spot, enhancing forgiveness on off-center hits. This feature is particularly beneficial for beginners who may struggle with consistent ball striking. The head-light balance in both racquets promotes maneuverability, but the Ti. Conquest offers more stability for new players as they learn to navigate the court.
Weight and Maneuverability
Weight plays a crucial role in the maneuverability of a racquet, and here, the HEAD Metallix Attitude Pro weighs 9.5 ounces, making it a mid-weight option that offers a balance of stability and control. Meanwhile, the Ti. Conquest is designed to be exceptionally lightweight, helping reduce player fatigue and making it easier to swing. This lightweight characteristic is particularly advantageous for beginners or those with slower swing speeds. As players progress, they may find themselves preferring the added weight of the Metallix Attitude Pro for a more controlled experience.
Playability and Performance
When it comes to playability, the HEAD Metallix Attitude Pro is geared toward providing a stable and powerful feel, making it suitable for players looking for precision in their shots. The combination of its head size and weight allows for a more dynamic playstyle. Conversely, the HEAD Ti. Conquest focuses on ease of use and comfort, enhancing the learning experience for beginners. Its forgiving oversized head and lightweight design help new players develop their technique without feeling overwhelmed. The performance differences between these racquets may affect a player's enjoyment of the game as they progress in skill.
Brand Reputation and Rankings
Both racquets are manufactured by HEAD, a brand known for its commitment to quality athletic equipment. The HEAD Metallix Attitude Pro has a sales rank of 71,881, indicating moderate popularity, while the HEAD Ti. Conquest ranks much higher at 7,713, signifying it is a favored choice among consumers, particularly for beginners. This ranking could influence a buyer's confidence in choosing the Ti. Conquest, as its popularity suggests a proven track record of satisfying user needs.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the HEAD Metallix Attitude Pro and the HEAD Ti. Conquest ultimately depends on your skill level and budget. If you're a beginner looking for an affordable and user-friendly option, the Ti. Conquest at $24.99 is an excellent choice, providing ease of use and a forgiving design. However, if you're an intermediate or advanced player seeking greater control and performance, the HEAD Metallix Attitude Pro, priced at $64.33, may be worth the investment. Consider your playing style, future goals, and budget to make the best decision for your tennis journey.

