Hoover SmartWash Pet XL Upright Carpet Cleaner vs Shark ZU62 Navigator Zero-M Self-Cleaning
Updated August 2026 — Hoover SmartWash Pet XL Upright Carpet Cleaner wins on tank size and weight, Shark ZU62 Navigator Zero-M Self-Cleaning wins on length and dust cup.
The Hoover SmartWash Pet XL excels in deep cleaning capabilities and automation, while the Shark ZU62 offers versatility and allergen control. Both are strong contenders for pet owners.
Why Hoover SmartWash Pet XL Upright Carpet Cleaner is better
Deep Cleaning
Hoover specializes in deep carpet cleaning.
Automation
Hoover features automatic cleaning technology.
Tank Capacity
Hoover has a larger tank for liquid cleaning.
Why Shark ZU62 Navigator Zero-M Self-Cleaning is better
Lightweight
Shark is designed for easy maneuverability.
Allergen Control
Shark includes HEPA filtration.
Self-Cleaning
Shark has a self-cleaning brushroll.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Hoover SmartWash Pet XL Upright Carpet Cleaner | Shark ZU62 Navigator Zero-M Self-Cleaning |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $289.99 | $281.11 |
| Sales Rank | 11205 | 253391 |
| Self-Cleaning | Yes | Yes |
| HEPA Filter | No | Yes |
| Spot Cleaning | Yes | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Products
The Hoover SmartWash Pet XL is priced at $289.99, while the Shark ZU62 Navigator Zero-M is slightly cheaper at $281.11, making it about 3% less expensive. Both products target pet owners, offering features designed to tackle pet hair and messes effectively. With the Hoover focusing on deep cleaning carpets and upholstery, and the Shark emphasizing versatility and self-cleaning capabilities, each product caters to different cleaning needs and preferences.
Cleaning Technology
The Hoover SmartWash Pet XL incorporates Automatic Cleaning Technology, which senses when to wash and dry, simplifying the cleaning process. This feature allows users to clean carpets almost effortlessly, akin to vacuuming. In contrast, the Shark ZU62 Navigator Zero-M utilizes a self-cleaning brushroll that continuously removes pet hair, ensuring that the brush remains effective during cleaning. While both technologies are impressive, the Hoover's automation may appeal more to those who prefer a hands-off approach, whereas the Shark is ideal for users who want an active cleaning solution that requires minimal maintenance.
Capacity and Convenience
Hoover's SmartWash Pet XL boasts an XL capacity tank of 96 ounces, allowing users to clean larger areas without frequent trips to the sink. This feature is especially useful for extensive carpet cleaning sessions. On the other hand, the Shark ZU62 has a 3XL dust cup capacity, which also minimizes interruptions for emptying during cleaning. The difference in tank sizes is notable, with the Hoover providing a more substantial capacity specifically for liquid cleaning, while the Shark focuses on solid debris. This distinction may affect your choice depending on the type of cleaning tasks you anticipate.
Portability and Design
When it comes to design, the Shark ZU62 is lightweight and designed for easy maneuverability, making it simple to navigate around furniture and tight spaces. Its extendable hose enhances reach, allowing users to clean various surfaces, including stairs and upholstery, without hassle. The Hoover SmartWash, while also designed for ease of use, leans more towards a bulkier design due to its larger tank. If portability and the ability to clean multiple surfaces are priorities, the Shark may be the better option.
Additional Features
The Hoover SmartWash includes several tools such as a 7-inch 2-in-1 stair tool and a gentle upholstery tool, providing versatility for different cleaning scenarios. Its Fast Dry Time feature, enabled by Heatforce Technology, ensures that cleaned areas dry quickly, allowing users to return to their routine without delay. In contrast, the Shark ZU62 features Anti-Allergen Complete Seal Technology and a HEPA filter, which traps dust and allergens inside the vacuum. This is particularly beneficial for allergy sufferers. While both machines offer useful additional features, your choice may depend on whether you prioritize drying capabilities over allergen filtration.
Maintenance and Clean-Up
The Hoover's self-cleaning tray is a standout feature that simplifies post-cleaning maintenance by flushing out hair and debris. This design minimizes the hassle of cleaning the machine itself, making it user-friendly for pet owners who frequently deal with hair buildup. Conversely, the Shark ZU62's self-cleaning brushroll minimizes the need for manual cleaning of the brush, but it does not have a dedicated cleaning tray like the Hoover. Both machines require some level of maintenance, but the Hoover’s design may be perceived as more convenient for regular use.
Price Comparison
With the Hoover SmartWash priced at $289.99 and the Shark ZU62 at $281.11, there is a price difference of about $8.88, which translates to approximately 3% cheaper for the Shark. However, considering the average price over the last 90 days, the Hoover has shown a higher average price of $327.26, indicating that the current price may represent a good deal. Price-sensitive buyers might lean towards the Shark for its lower upfront cost, while those focused on performance features may find the Hoover's price justified.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Hoover SmartWash Pet XL and the Shark ZU62 Navigator Zero-M depends heavily on your cleaning needs and priorities. If you seek a machine that excels in deep carpet cleaning with automation and a larger tank, the Hoover is an excellent choice. However, if you prioritize versatility, lightweight design, and allergen control, the Shark is a strong contender. Ultimately, both products deliver quality performance tailored to pet owners, but your specific cleaning requirements will guide the best decision for you.

