vsversusfinder

Husqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw, 38-cc, vs Husqvarna Power Axe 350i Cordless Electric Chainsaw,

Updated August 2026 — Husqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw, 38-cc, wins on price, Husqvarna Power Axe 350i Cordless Electric Chainsaw, wins on maintenance and power.

The Husqvarna Power Axe 350i offers superior cutting power and convenience, while the Husqvarna 120 Mark III is a cost-effective choice for homeowners.

Why Husqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw, 38-cc, is better

Price

The 120 Mark III is significantly cheaper.

Weight

The 120 Mark III is lighter than many gas chainsaws.

Fuel Type

Gas chainsaws can be refueled quickly.

Why Husqvarna Power Axe 350i Cordless Electric Chainsaw, is better

Cutting Power

The Power Axe has superior cutting power.

Maintenance

The Power Axe requires less maintenance.

Noise Level

The Power Axe operates more quietly.

Overall score

Husqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw, 38-cc,
75
Husqvarna Power Axe 350i Cordless Electric Chainsaw,
85

Specifications

SpecHusqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw, 38-cc,Husqvarna Power Axe 350i Cordless Electric Chainsaw,
Engine TypeGasElectric
Bar Length16 inch18 inch
Motor TypeX-TorqBrushless
Battery IncludedNoYes
Chain BrakeInertiaIndicator Light

Dimension comparison

Husqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw, 38-cc,Husqvarna Power Axe 350i Cordless Electric Chainsaw,

Overview of the Chainsaws

When comparing the Husqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw and the Husqvarna Power Axe 350i Cordless Electric Chainsaw, it's clear that each model is designed for different user preferences and needs. The 120 Mark III, priced at $219.99, is an all-round gas saw ideal for homeowners, while the Power Axe 350i, at $429.99, emphasizes battery-powered convenience and cutting power. Understanding the differences in design and functionality is essential for making the right choice.

Power and Performance

The Husqvarna Power Axe 350i boasts superior cutting power compared to gas chainsaws, making it a compelling choice for those who prioritize efficiency. With an 18-inch bar, the Power Axe utilizes a brushless motor that not only enhances durability but also ensures quiet operation. In contrast, the Husqvarna 120 Mark III features a 16-inch bar and a 38-cc X-Torq engine that provides efficient combustion, delivering great power and torque for tasks like tree pruning. However, the added cutting length and enhanced power of the Power Axe make it a better option for larger projects.

Weight and Maneuverability

The Husqvarna Power Axe 350i is designed to be lightweight, making it easier to handle during extended use. At 10% lighter than comparable gas chainsaws, this model is especially appealing for those who may find a gas saw cumbersome. The 120 Mark III, while also lightweight for a gas saw, may still be heavier due to its engine and fuel requirements. Users looking for maneuverability should consider the Power Axe, especially for tasks that require precision and ease of movement.

Fuel and Power Source

The difference in power sources is a significant factor between these two chainsaws. The Husqvarna 120 Mark III operates on a 2-cycle gas engine, which can be an advantage for users familiar with gas-powered tools and looking for quick refueling. However, the Power Axe 350i runs on a 40V lithium-ion battery, offering the convenience of not needing to mix fuel and a quieter operation. Users who value environmental considerations may also prefer the battery-powered model for its lower emissions.

Safety Features

Safety is paramount when operating chainsaws, and both models come equipped with essential safety features. The Husqvarna 120 Mark III includes an inertia-activated chain brake, which enhances user safety during operation. The Power Axe 350i also incorporates a chain brake with an indicator light that shows when the brake is engaged, providing an extra layer of safety. Both chainsaws offer significant safety enhancements, but the Power Axe’s modern features may appeal more to tech-savvy users.

Maintenance Requirements

In terms of maintenance, the Husqvarna Power Axe 350i can be less demanding. With the absence of gas and oil mixing, users can enjoy a more straightforward upkeep routine. The tool-less chain tensioning system on the Power Axe also simplifies adjustments, making it user-friendly. On the other hand, the 120 Mark III requires periodic maintenance typical of gas-powered engines, including air filter cleaning and fuel mixture preparation. Users looking for low-maintenance options might lean towards the Power Axe.

Price Comparison

The Husqvarna 120 Mark III is priced at $219.99, making it about 49% cheaper than the Husqvarna Power Axe 350i, which retails for $429.99. This significant price difference reflects the capabilities and technologies of each chainsaw. For budget-conscious consumers, the 120 Mark III offers a reliable option without compromising too much on performance for typical homeowner tasks. However, those willing to invest more for advanced features may find the Power Axe worth the extra cost.

Customer Rankings

In terms of customer popularity, the Husqvarna 120 Mark III has a sales rank of 10,666, indicating a strong presence in the market for gas chainsaws. The Power Axe 350i, however, has a sales rank of 24,107, suggesting it is less frequently purchased than the 120 Mark III. This difference in ranking may reflect customer preferences leaning towards gas models for traditional cutting tasks, though the Power Axe appeals to a niche market looking for battery-operated solutions.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Husqvarna 120 Mark III Gas Chainsaw and the Husqvarna Power Axe 350i Cordless Electric Chainsaw ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you prioritize a lightweight design, low maintenance, and prefer a quieter operation, the Power Axe may be the better choice despite its higher price. Conversely, if you're looking for a powerful and cost-effective solution for typical homeowner tasks, the 120 Mark III is an excellent option that delivers solid performance at a more affordable price. Consider your cutting needs, budget, and preference for power sources when making your decision.