vsversusfinder

Husqvarna 130 Gas Powered Chainsaw, 38-cc 2-HP, vs WORX WG324.9 20V Power Share 5” Cordless Pruning

Updated August 2026 — Husqvarna 130 Gas Powered Chainsaw, 38-cc 2-HP, wins on cutting length and power, WORX WG324.9 20V Power Share 5” Cordless Pruning wins on price and weight.

The Husqvarna 130 offers superior power and cutting capacity, making it ideal for heavy-duty tasks, while the WORX WG324.9 is a lightweight and affordable option for light pruning.

Why Husqvarna 130 Gas Powered Chainsaw, 38-cc 2-HP, is better

Power

Gas-powered engine provides superior cutting performance.

Cutting Capacity

16-inch blade suitable for larger jobs.

Durability

Built for heavy-duty use with robust construction.

Why WORX WG324.9 20V Power Share 5” Cordless Pruning is better

Weight

Weighs only 3.9 lbs for easy one-handed operation.

Price

Significantly cheaper at $59.

Portability

Cordless design allows for hassle-free use.

Overall score

Husqvarna 130 Gas Powered Chainsaw, 38-cc 2-HP,
85
WORX WG324.9 20V Power Share 5” Cordless Pruning
65

Specifications

SpecHusqvarna 130 Gas Powered Chainsaw, 38-cc 2-HP,WORX WG324.9 20V Power Share 5” Cordless Pruning
Engine TypeGasBattery
Blade Length16 inches5 inches
Max SpeedN/A22 ft/s
WeightN/A3.9 lbs
Price$259.00$59.00

Dimension comparison

Husqvarna 130 Gas Powered Chainsaw, 38-cc 2-HP,WORX WG324.9 20V Power Share 5” Cordless Pruning

Overview of the Chainsaws

When comparing the Husqvarna 130 Gas Powered Chainsaw and the WORX WG324.9 20V Power Share Cordless Pruning Saw, the most striking difference is their power source and intended use. The Husqvarna chainsaw is gas-powered, providing significant cutting power for larger tasks, while the WORX pruning saw is a lightweight, battery-operated tool designed for simpler pruning jobs. The Husqvarna is priced at $259.00, making it a more significant investment compared to the WORX’s price of $59.00, which is about 77% cheaper.

Power and Performance

The Husqvarna 130 is equipped with a robust 38-cc, 2-HP X-Torq engine, offering superior performance for demanding cutting tasks. This gas-powered chainsaw is ideal for tree cutting and heavy-duty pruning, allowing the user to tackle larger branches effectively. In contrast, the WORX WG324.9 features a high-efficiency motor that delivers smooth cuts at a speed of 22 ft/s but is limited to a 5-inch cutting capacity. While the Husqvarna is better suited for extensive projects, the WORX excels in portability and ease of use for smaller tasks.

Weight and Maneuverability

Weighing in at a mere 3.9 lbs with the battery, the WORX pruning saw is significantly lighter than the Husqvarna 130, which, while not explicitly stated, is typically heavier due to its gas engine and construction. This lightweight design allows for one-handed operation and makes it ideal for reaching elevated heights without fatigue. Conversely, the Husqvarna, while offering greater power, may cause operator fatigue during prolonged use due to its heavier build. This difference in weight is crucial for users who prioritize ease of handling in their gardening or pruning tasks.

Cutting Capacity

The cutting capacity is another vital distinction between the two products. The Husqvarna 130 features a 16-inch blade, making it suitable for larger cutting jobs, including tree felling and heavy pruning. The WORX WG324.9, on the other hand, has a 5-inch cutting capacity, making it ideal for light pruning and trimming of smaller branches. Users looking for heavy-duty performance will find the Husqvarna more fitting, while those needing a versatile tool for minor tasks might appreciate the convenience of the WORX saw.

Safety Features

Safety is paramount when using power tools, and both chainsaws come equipped with features to protect the user. The Husqvarna 130 includes an inertia-activated chain brake to reduce the risk of injury from kickback, enhancing safety during operation. Similarly, the WORX pruning saw is designed with a hand guard and upper chain guard to safeguard against cuts and scrapes, along with a lock-out switch to prevent accidental starts. While both tools prioritize safety, the Husqvarna’s advanced chain brake technology may offer an additional layer of protection for more intense cutting tasks.

Battery vs. Gasoline

The choice between battery and gasoline power significantly influences the user experience. The Husqvarna 130 requires fuel for operation, which means users must account for fuel availability and maintenance associated with gas engines. However, its gas power translates to longer operational periods without needing a recharge, making it suitable for extensive projects. In contrast, the WORX pruning saw utilizes a 20V battery, providing the convenience of cordless operation and compatibility with over 140 other tools in the Power Share family. For users who prefer a hassle-free experience without dealing with fuel, the WORX offers a compelling advantage.

Price and Value

Price is a critical factor when choosing between these two chainsaws. The Husqvarna 130 is priced at $259.00, reflecting its robust construction and power capabilities, while the WORX WG324.9 is priced at $59.00, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious consumers. The significant price difference of about $200 indicates the trade-off between professional-grade performance and a more user-friendly, less powerful tool. Depending on the user’s needs—whether for heavy-duty cutting or casual pruning—the value proposition of each chainsaw varies considerably.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the Husqvarna 130 Gas Powered Chainsaw and the WORX WG324.9 Cordless Pruning Saw boils down to the user's specific needs. If you require a powerful tool for extensive cutting tasks, the Husqvarna is worth the investment with its superior engine and cutting capacity. However, if you are looking for a lightweight, affordable option for light pruning and trimming, the WORX is an excellent choice at a fraction of the cost. Your decision should align with your cutting requirements and how often you plan to use the tool.