Husqvarna 130 Gas Powered Chainsaw, 38-cc 2-HP, vs WTHW 58 cc Gas Powered Chainsaw, 20 in & 18 in
Updated August 2026 — WTHW 58 cc Gas Powered Chainsaw, 20 in & 18 in leads on engine size and bar length.
The Husqvarna 130 is ideal for light tasks with a focus on user-friendliness and safety, while the WTHW 58 cc offers more power and versatility at a lower price.
Why Husqvarna 130 Gas Powered Chainsaw, 38-cc 2-HP, is better
Price
Husqvarna 130 is more expensive at $259.00.
Weight
Husqvarna is lighter, making it easier to handle.
Safety Features
Husqvarna has advanced safety features for beginners.
Why WTHW 58 cc Gas Powered Chainsaw, 20 in & 18 in is better
Power
WTHW has a larger 58 cc engine.
Versatility
WTHW offers quick-switch bar lengths.
Fuel Efficiency
WTHW has a larger fuel tank for longer runtime.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Husqvarna 130 Gas Powered Chainsaw, 38-cc 2-HP, | WTHW 58 cc Gas Powered Chainsaw, 20 in & 18 in |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 2 HP | 2.5 HP |
| Start Mechanism | Fuel Pump | Quick-Start |
| Chain Brake | Inertia-Activated | Inertial |
| Air Filter | Air Injection | Centrifugal |
| User Level | Beginner | Intermediate |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Chainsaws
When comparing the Husqvarna 130 Gas Powered Chainsaw and the WTHW 58 cc Gas Powered Chainsaw, it's evident that both tools serve specific needs in the realm of wood cutting. The Husqvarna 130 is positioned as a lightweight, user-friendly option ideal for home and garden tasks, while the WTHW 58 cc boasts a more powerful engine and versatile bar lengths for diverse applications.
The Husqvarna 130 is priced at $259.00 and is recognized for its ease of use and safety features, ranking 30,175 in sales. In contrast, the WTHW 58 cc is considerably cheaper at $149.99 and ranks 25,287 in sales, showcasing a strong value proposition for users seeking efficiency and power.
Power and Engine Performance
The WTHW 58 cc is equipped with a larger 58 cc engine, providing more power compared to the Husqvarna 130, which has a 38 cc engine. This difference translates to the WTHW's ability to handle larger cutting tasks with its enhanced performance.
While the Husqvarna delivers 2 HP, the WTHW's engine allows for quicker cuts and less frequent refueling due to its larger fuel tank. The difference in engine size results in the WTHW being better suited for extensive projects, while the Husqvarna 130 remains an excellent choice for lighter, more standard tasks.
Ease of Use and Starting Mechanisms
The Husqvarna 130 excels in user-friendliness, featuring a fuel pump and combined choke/stop control that simplifies the starting process. This makes it particularly appealing for those who may not be as experienced with chainsaws. Its design minimizes the risk of engine flooding and provides a safer operation with its inertia-activated chain brake.
Conversely, the WTHW 58 cc also emphasizes ease of starting with its Quick-Start recoil mechanism. This ensures that users can get to work quickly, even in cold conditions. While both chainsaws aim to reduce frustrations at startup, the Husqvarna's additional safety features may provide an edge for cautious users.
Cutting Versatility
The WTHW 58 cc offers a unique advantage with its Quick-Switch system, which allows users to swap between an 18-inch limbing bar and a 20-inch felling bar. This versatility makes it suitable for a range of cutting tasks, from precision pruning to tackling larger fallen trees.
On the other hand, the Husqvarna 130 is designed for use with bars ranging from 14 to 16 inches, making it more limited in terms of bar length adaptability. While it is excellent for general home use, users with varying cutting needs might find the WTHW more accommodating for different scenarios.
Weight and Handling
The Husqvarna 130 is designed with LowVib technology, which minimizes vibrations to improve handling and reduce operator fatigue. This makes it a great option for users who may need to use the saw for extended periods, contributing to a more comfortable user experience.
The WTHW 58 cc, while offering more power, may not have the same emphasis on vibration reduction, potentially leading to more fatigue in prolonged use. However, its robust design and reliable performance can offset this for users focused on power and efficiency over comfort.
Maintenance and Engine Longevity
Maintenance is crucial for the longevity of any chainsaw, and both models feature systems that aim to protect the engine. The Husqvarna 130 has an Air Injection technology that expels larger dust and debris particles before they reach the air filter, thereby extending engine life and reducing maintenance frequency.
The WTHW 58 cc also incorporates a pro-grade centrifugal air filter, designed to safeguard the engine from dust and debris, ensuring fewer work stoppages. This feature allows users to rely on the tool over multiple seasons, though the effectiveness of each system may depend on the specific working conditions.
Safety Features
Safety is paramount when operating chainsaws, and both the Husqvarna 130 and WTHW 58 cc include important safety mechanisms. The Husqvarna model features an inertia-activated chain brake designed to reduce the likelihood of injury due to kickback, making it a safer option for novice users.
The WTHW 58 cc also includes a fast-acting inertial chain brake and a low-kickback chain, promoting user safety. While both chainsaws have commendable safety features, the Husqvarna's specific focus on reducing kickback may be particularly beneficial for less experienced operators.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the Husqvarna 130 and the WTHW 58 cc ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you're looking for a lightweight, user-friendly chainsaw for home tasks and value safety, the Husqvarna 130 is a solid choice at $259.00. However, if you need a more powerful tool that offers versatility with quick bar switching for various cutting tasks and a significantly lower price of $149.99, the WTHW 58 cc may be the better option. Each chainsaw has its strengths, and understanding your requirements will guide you to the most suitable model.

