ID-COOLING FX240 PRO Liquid CPU Cooler for Desktop - vs Thermalright AXP90 X36 Low Profile ITX CPU Cooler,
Updated August 2026 — ID-COOLING FX240 PRO Liquid CPU Cooler for Desktop - leads on cooling performa and build quality.
The ID-COOLING FX240 PRO excels in performance and aesthetics, while the Thermalright AXP90 X36 is a budget-friendly, compact option. Choose based on your specific needs.
Why ID-COOLING FX240 PRO Liquid CPU Cooler for Desktop - is better
Cooling Performance
Higher TDP of 300W vs 36mm height cooler
Aesthetics
Distinctive design with CD pattern vs utilitarian look
Airflow
Max airflow of 82.5 CFM vs lower airflow
Why Thermalright AXP90 X36 Low Profile ITX CPU Cooler, is better
Price
Significantly cheaper at $20.39 vs $54.99
Size
Low-profile design for compact builds
Noise Level
Quieter operation at 22.4 DBA
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ID-COOLING FX240 PRO Liquid CPU Cooler for Desktop - | Thermalright AXP90 X36 Low Profile ITX CPU Cooler, |
|---|---|---|
| Cooling Type | Liquid | Air |
| Max Airflow | 82.5 CFM | N/A |
| Noise Level | N/A | 22.4 DBA |
| Compatibility | Intel & AMD | Intel & AMD |
| Installation | Complex | Easy |
Dimension comparison
Overview of CPU Coolers
The ID-COOLING FX240 PRO Liquid CPU Cooler and the Thermalright AXP90 X36 Low Profile ITX CPU Cooler cater to different segments of the CPU cooling market. The ID-COOLING FX240 PRO is a high-performance 240mm liquid cooler, while the Thermalright AXP90 X36 is a compact, low-profile air cooler. Both products aim to provide efficient cooling for CPUs, but they do so using different technologies and designs.
Design and Aesthetics
When it comes to design, the ID-COOLING FX240 PRO stands out with its all-black layout and a distinctive CD pattern on the pump header, making it an attractive addition to any gaming setup. In contrast, the Thermalright AXP90 X36, with its low-profile design of just 36mm in height, is more utilitarian, focusing on compactness rather than aesthetics. The sleek, all-metal platform of the AXP90 X36 does offer a premium feel but lacks the visual flair of the FX240 PRO.
Cooling Efficiency
The ID-COOLING FX240 PRO is designed for high-performance systems, boasting a TDP of 300W, which makes it suitable for overclocking and demanding applications. Its two 120mm fans provide a maximum airflow of 82.5 CFM, ensuring efficient heat dissipation. Meanwhile, the Thermalright AXP90 X36, while compact, utilizes four 6mm heat pipes and operates at a noise level of just 22.4 DBA, making it a quieter option for smaller builds. However, its lower overall cooling capacity may not be as effective for high-end CPUs compared to the FX240 PRO.
Compatibility
Both coolers offer broad compatibility, but they cater to slightly different needs. The ID-COOLING FX240 PRO supports a wide range of Intel and AMD sockets, including newer generations like Intel LGA1700 and AMD AM5. The Thermalright AXP90 X36 also supports various Intel and AMD sockets but is particularly suited for ITX builds, making it a great choice for users with space constraints. If you’re looking to build a compact system, the AXP90 X36 may be a better fit.
Pricing Comparison
The ID-COOLING FX240 PRO is priced at $54.99, while the Thermalright AXP90 X36 is significantly cheaper at $20.39, making it about 63% less expensive. This price difference allows budget-conscious builders to consider the AXP90 X36 without sacrificing essential cooling performance for lower-end systems. For users who require advanced cooling capabilities, the investment in the FX240 PRO could be justified, especially considering its high-performance specifications.
Installation Process
Installation can vary significantly between the two coolers. The ID-COOLING FX240 PRO may have a more complex installation due to its liquid cooling setup, which often requires more careful handling and additional mounting components. The Thermalright AXP90 X36, on the other hand, is designed for easy installation in tight spaces, thanks to its low-profile design. Users looking for a straightforward, hassle-free setup may prefer the AXP90 X36.
Noise Levels
Noise levels are an important consideration for many PC builders. The ID-COOLING FX240 PRO operates at a higher performance level, which can lead to increased noise under load, though specific decibel ratings are not provided. Conversely, the Thermalright AXP90 X36 is designed to operate quietly, with a noise level of 22.4 DBA, making it ideal for users who prioritize a silent computing experience. If noise is a concern, the AXP90 X36 clearly has the advantage.
Long-Term Value
In terms of long-term value, the ID-COOLING FX240 PRO offers advanced cooling capabilities that may extend the lifespan of high-performance CPUs, especially in gaming or overclocked scenarios. On the other hand, the Thermalright AXP90 X36 provides an affordable cooling solution for budget builds and compact systems. While the upfront cost of the FX240 PRO is higher, its efficiency may lead to better thermal performance over time, making it a worthwhile investment for serious gamers or professionals.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ID-COOLING FX240 PRO and the Thermalright AXP90 X36 ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you are building a high-performance system and require superior cooling with aesthetic appeal, the ID-COOLING FX240 PRO is the better option despite its higher price. However, if you are working with a compact build or are on a tight budget, the Thermalright AXP90 X36 offers excellent cooling performance at a fraction of the cost. Each cooler serves its purpose well, so consider your priorities before making a decision.

