vsversusfinder

Igloo 3.2 Cu.Ft. Mini Fridge with Freezer - Single vs Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star

Updated July 2026 — Igloo 3.2 Cu.Ft. Mini Fridge with Freezer - Single wins on capacity and cooling, Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star wins on price and noise.

The Igloo 3.2 Cu.Ft. Mini Fridge offers more capacity and better cooling performance, while the Midea WHS-65LB1 is more budget-friendly and energy-efficient.

Why Igloo 3.2 Cu.Ft. Mini Fridge with Freezer - Single is better

Capacity

Igloo has 3.2 cu. ft. vs Midea's 1.6 cu. ft.

Cooling Range

Igloo's range is 32-50°F vs Midea's 28.4-35.6°F.

Storage Features

Igloo has more versatile storage options.

Why Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star is better

Price

Midea is $122.99 vs Igloo's $159.99.

Energy Efficiency

Midea is Energy Star certified.

Noise Level

Midea operates at less than 42dB.

Overall score

Igloo 3.2 Cu.Ft. Mini Fridge with Freezer - Single
85
Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star
75

Specifications

SpecIgloo 3.2 Cu.Ft. Mini Fridge with Freezer - SingleMidea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star
Cooling TypeCompressorCompressor
Energy UseN/A207 Kwh/Y
ThermostatAdjustableAdjustable
Door TypeSingleReversible
Sales Rank21695958

Dimension comparison

Igloo 3.2 Cu.Ft. Mini Fridge with Freezer - SingleMidea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star

Design and Dimensions

In terms of design, the Igloo 3.2 Cu.Ft. Mini Fridge offers a larger capacity than the Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, making it more suitable for users who need extra storage space. The Igloo model has a capacity of 3.2 cu. ft., compared to the Midea's 1.6 cu. ft. This means the Igloo can hold more beverages, snacks, and frozen items, which can be a significant advantage for users with larger needs. The sleek, freestanding design of the Igloo fridge, combined with its separate freezer compartment, provides versatility that many consumers look for in a mini refrigerator. In contrast, the Midea's compact size, with dimensions of 18.617.719.4 inches, is ideal for tight spaces, but it may not accommodate as much as the Igloo.

Cooling Performance

When it comes to cooling performance, both refrigerators employ a compressor cooling system, but they differ in their temperature ranges. The Igloo mini fridge can maintain a cooling range of 32 – 50 degrees Fahrenheit, allowing for more precise temperature control and the ability to keep a wider variety of food items fresh. On the other hand, the Midea WHS-65LB1 has a cooling range from 28.4°F to 35.6°F, which is adequate, but may not be as effective for all types of food storage. Therefore, the Igloo's cooling capabilities may be more appealing for users who prioritize flexibility in food preservation.

Energy Efficiency

The Midea WHS-65LB1 is recognized as an Energy Star certified appliance, consuming only 207 Kwh/Y, which makes it an energy-efficient choice for budget-conscious consumers. In comparison, the Igloo 3.2 Cu.Ft. Mini Fridge does not have specific energy efficiency ratings mentioned, which may raise concerns for environmentally conscious buyers. While the Igloo is designed to operate quietly and effectively, the explicit energy-saving features of the Midea make it a more attractive option for those seeking to minimize their electricity bills in the long run.

Noise Level

The noise level can significantly affect user experience, especially in quiet environments like dorms or offices. The Midea WHS-65LB1 operates at less than 42dB, ensuring a quiet operation that won't disturb your daily activities. Although the Igloo mini fridge is designed to run quietly with its compressor cooling system, no specific decibel rating is provided. Given the explicit low noise rating of the Midea, it may be the better choice for users who prioritize a silent working environment.

Storage Features

Storage features play a crucial role in the functionality of a mini fridge. The Igloo 3.2 Cu.Ft. model offers smart storage solutions with slide-out shelves and designated tall bottle racks, making it easier to organize various food items. This fridge's design also includes vertical can storage, which allows for a more efficient use of space. In contrast, while the Midea WHS-65LB1 does include a glass shelf and a 2L bottle rack, it lacks the same level of versatility in storage options. The added space and organizational capabilities of the Igloo make it a more favorable choice for users needing efficient storage.

Price Comparison

The price difference between the two mini fridges is notable, with the Igloo 3.2 Cu.Ft. Mini Fridge priced at $159.99, while the Midea WHS-65LB1 is available for $122.99. This makes the Midea about 17% cheaper than the Igloo model. For consumers who are looking for a budget-friendly option, the Midea could be more appealing. However, it's essential to consider whether the additional features and larger capacity of the Igloo justify the higher price for your specific needs.

Sales Rank and Popularity

In terms of popularity, the Igloo 3.2 Cu.Ft. Mini Fridge holds a better sales rank, sitting at 2169, compared to the Midea WHS-65LB1, which has a sales rank of 5958. This suggests that consumers may prefer the Igloo model for its size and features, indicating that it might be a more trusted option among buyers. However, the Midea's lower price point may attract those who prioritize cost over capacity.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the Igloo 3.2 Cu.Ft. Mini Fridge and the Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge depends largely on your specific needs and preferences. If you require a larger capacity, a broader cooling range, and enhanced storage features, the Igloo may be worth the extra cost. However, if energy efficiency, a quieter operation, and a more budget-friendly price are your main concerns, the Midea could be the better option. Consider what matters most for your space and usage to make the best decision.