Ingersoll Rand 231C 1/2-Inch-Drive Air Impact Wrench vs Makita XWT08Z 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Brushless
Updated August 2026 — Ingersoll Rand 231C 1/2-Inch-Drive Air Impact Wrench wins on weight, Makita XWT08Z 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Brushless wins on battery life and speed control.
The Makita XWT08Z offers superior torque and cordless convenience, making it the better choice for heavy-duty applications.
Why Ingersoll Rand 231C 1/2-Inch-Drive Air Impact Wrench is better
Price
Ingersoll Rand is significantly cheaper at $144.99.
Weight
Ingersoll Rand is lighter at 5.8 lbs.
Maintenance
Ingersoll Rand has straightforward two-piece construction.
Why Makita XWT08Z 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Brushless is better
Torque
Makita offers 740 ft-lbs of fastening torque.
Power Source
Makita is cordless, providing greater mobility.
Speed Control
Makita features a 3-speed power selection switch.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Ingersoll Rand 231C 1/2-Inch-Drive Air Impact Wrench | Makita XWT08Z 18V LXT® Lithium-Ion Brushless |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Ingersoll Rand | Makita |
| Power Source | Air Compressor | Cordless |
| Max Torque | 600 ft-lbs | 740 ft-lbs |
| Speed Control | No | Yes |
| Construction | Two-piece | Brushless |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Ingersoll Rand 231C is priced at $144.99, making it significantly cheaper than the Makita XWT08Z, which retails for $275.66. This price difference of about 47% means that for budget-conscious buyers, the Ingersoll Rand offers a more accessible entry point into high-torque impact wrenches. While both tools provide excellent performance, the substantial cost gap can be a deciding factor for many users looking to maximize value without sacrificing quality.
Torque and Performance
When it comes to torque, the Makita XWT08Z outperforms the Ingersoll Rand 231C, offering 740 ft-lbs of fastening torque and an impressive 1,180 ft-lbs of nut-busting torque. In comparison, the Ingersoll Rand provides a maximum torque of 600 ft-lbs. This means that for heavy-duty applications, the Makita may be the better choice, as it can handle tougher jobs with ease. Users who frequently work with stubborn bolts and fasteners will appreciate the extra torque provided by the Makita.
Power Source
The Ingersoll Rand 231C operates with an air compressor, while the Makita XWT08Z is a cordless model powered by an 18V lithium-ion battery. This distinction is crucial for users considering mobility and convenience. The cordless design of the Makita allows for greater flexibility and ease of use in various job sites without the need for an air compressor. In contrast, the Ingersoll Rand requires a consistent air supply, which may limit its portability but can provide consistent power for extended use.
Speed and Control
The Makita XWT08Z features a 3-speed power selection switch, allowing users to select speeds of 0-900, 0-1,000, or 0-1,800 RPM, along with an impact rate of up to 2,200 IPM. This level of control is particularly advantageous for a range of applications, from automotive work to construction. In contrast, the Ingersoll Rand offers rotational speeds up to 8,000 RPM but does not provide the same level of variable speed control. Thus, users who need tailored performance for specific tasks may find the Makita's versatility to be a significant advantage.
Weight and Design
The Ingersoll Rand 231C weighs 5.8 lbs and measures 7.3 inches in length, highlighting its lightweight and ergonomic design, which minimizes stress during extended use. The Makita XWT08Z's weight isn't specified, but its design focuses on comfort and efficiency, with the BL Brushless Motor eliminating carbon brushes for a cooler operation. Users prioritizing comfort during prolonged tasks may prefer the Ingersoll Rand's lightweight construction, while those looking for a more advanced motor may favor the Makita.
Durability and Maintenance
Both tools are built with durability in mind. The Ingersoll Rand 231C features a two-piece construction that makes maintenance straightforward, while the Makita XWT08Z is designed with a brushless motor that enhances its longevity. The Ingersoll Rand is constructed to withstand demanding environments, making it suitable for professional mechanics and auto hobbyists alike. Conversely, the Makita’s brushless technology reduces wear and increases efficiency, appealing to those who seek long-term reliability without frequent maintenance.
Brand Reputation and Sales Rank
Ingersoll Rand has a long-standing reputation for producing high-quality tools, with a best-seller rank of 28,421. Similarly, the Makita XWT08Z, with a sales rank of 27,738, showcases its popularity among users. Both brands are recognized for their commitment to quality and innovation, making either product a reliable choice. However, brand loyalty may influence some users, as they might prefer one brand over the other based on past experiences or specific industry preferences.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Ingersoll Rand 231C and the Makita XWT08Z ultimately depends on your specific needs. If you're looking for a cost-effective solution with reliable performance, the Ingersoll Rand at $144.99 is about 47% cheaper and offers adequate torque for most applications. However, if you require higher torque and the convenience of cordless operation, the Makita XWT08Z, priced at $275.66, provides significant advantages in performance and versatility. Assess your requirements carefully to determine which impact wrench aligns best with your tasks.

