vsversusfinder

Intel Boxed Core I7-6700 FC-LGA14C 3.40 GHz 8 M vs Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 235 14

Updated August 2026 — Intel Boxed Core I7-6700 FC-LGA14C 3.40 GHz 8 M wins on price and compatibility, Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 235 14 wins on cache and performance.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 offers superior performance and modern features, making it the better choice for demanding tasks. However, the i7-6700 remains a solid budget option for everyday use.

Why Intel Boxed Core I7-6700 FC-LGA14C 3.40 GHz 8 M is better

Price

Lower cost at $96.99

Power

Typically lower power consumption

Compatibility

Works with older Intel 100 series chipsets

Why Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 235 14 is better

Performance

Higher core count and speed

Cache

Larger 26 MB cache

Modern Features

Supports PCIe 5.0 and DDR5 memory

Overall score

Intel Boxed Core I7-6700 FC-LGA14C 3.40 GHz 8 M
70
Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 235 14
90

Specifications

SpecIntel Boxed Core I7-6700 FC-LGA14C 3.40 GHz 8 MIntel® Core™ Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 235 14
Cores414
Threads814
Base Clock3.40 GHzUp to 5.0 GHz
Cache8 MB26 MB
Memory SupportDDR4DDR5

Dimension comparison

Intel Boxed Core I7-6700 FC-LGA14C 3.40 GHz 8 MIntel® Core™ Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 235 14

Overview of the Products

The Intel Boxed Core i7-6700 is priced at $96.99, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 235 is significantly more expensive at $266.21. The stark difference in price—about 175% more for the Ultra 5—raises questions about performance and suitability for different users. This comparison will evaluate the features, performance, and overall value of these two processors to help potential buyers make an informed choice.

Performance Capabilities

The Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 235 boasts a performance hybrid architecture with 14 cores (6 P-cores and 8 E-cores), significantly outperforming the Intel Boxed Core i7-6700, which features 4 cores. This architectural design allows the Ultra 5 to prioritize and distribute workloads more effectively, making it ideal for both gaming and productivity tasks. The Ultra 5 can reach speeds of up to 5.0 GHz, while the i7-6700 operates at a base frequency of 3.40 GHz. This performance gap suggests that for demanding applications, the Ultra 5 is a superior choice.

Architectural Differences

The Intel Boxed Core i7-6700 is part of the 6th generation Intel Core series, utilizing a more traditional architecture, whereas the Intel Core Ultra 5 integrates a more modern performance hybrid architecture. This allows the Ultra 5 to not only support advanced features like PCIe 5.0 and DDR5 memory but also enhances its ability to handle multitasking efficiently. The i7-6700, while still capable, is limited to older technologies such as DDR4 and DDR3L support, which may influence future upgradability.

Cache and Memory Support

The Intel Core Ultra 5 includes a generous 26 MB cache compared to the 8 MB cache of the i7-6700. This larger cache allows for quicker data access and improved performance in memory-intensive tasks. Additionally, the Ultra 5 supports DDR5 memory, which offers higher bandwidth compared to DDR4, making it more suitable for modern applications. Conversely, the i7-6700’s memory support is limited to DDR4-1866/2133 and DDR3L-1333/1600, potentially restricting its performance in heavy workloads.

Integrated Graphics

Both processors feature integrated graphics, but the Intel Core Ultra 5 includes enhanced Intel Graphics, which are optimized for modern gaming and productivity tasks. This can be a decisive factor for users who do not have dedicated graphics cards. The i7-6700’s integrated graphics are adequate for basic tasks but may not perform as well in graphics-intensive applications. Thus, the Ultra 5 provides an advantage for users who need good graphics performance without a dedicated GPU.

Power Consumption

The Intel Boxed Core i7-6700 operates with a lower power requirement compared to the Ultra 5. The Ultra 5 has a Processor Base Power of 65W, while the i7-6700's specifications do not explicitly mention its power consumption but typically operates at a lower wattage. This could make the i7-6700 a better choice for users focused on energy efficiency or those building a quieter system. However, the Ultra 5's advanced features may justify its higher power consumption for performance-oriented users.

Compatibility

Compatibility varies significantly between the two processors. The Intel Core Ultra 5 is designed to work with Intel 800 series chipset-based motherboards, while the i7-6700 is compatible with Intel 100 series chipsets. This factor can influence a buyer’s decision based on their existing hardware or planned upgrades. If a user already owns a compatible motherboard for the Ultra 5, the investment could be worthwhile; however, those with older systems may find the i7-6700 a more practical choice without needing to upgrade their entire setup.

Price Considerations

The price difference between the two processors is substantial, with the Intel Core Ultra 5 priced at $266.21, making it about 175% more expensive than the i7-6700 at $96.99. This pricing reflects the Ultra 5's advanced features and performance capabilities, which may appeal more to gamers and professionals requiring high computational power. For casual users or those with limited budgets, the i7-6700 presents a compelling value, especially for everyday computing tasks.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Intel Boxed Core i7-6700 and the Intel Core Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 235 depends largely on your specific needs and budget. If you prioritize high performance for gaming and intensive applications, the Ultra 5 is worth the investment due to its superior architecture and capabilities. However, if you are looking for a budget-friendly option for standard computing tasks, the i7-6700 remains a solid choice. Ultimately, understanding what you need from a processor will guide you toward the best option for your situation.