Intel® Core™ i5-11400 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up vs Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 225 10
Updated August 2026 — Intel® Core™ i5-11400 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up wins on compatibility and graphics, Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 225 10 wins on performance and cache.
The Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 offers superior performance for multitasking and gaming, while the i5-11400 excels in graphics capabilities and multi-monitor support.
Why Intel® Core™ i5-11400 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up is better
Price
i5-11400 is slightly more expensive.
Graphics
i5-11400 has better multi-monitor support.
Cache
i5-11400 has a smaller cache.
Why Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 225 10 is better
Performance
Ultra 5 has more cores and higher clock speed.
Architecture
Ultra 5 features a hybrid architecture.
Cache
Ultra 5 has a larger cache size.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Intel® Core™ i5-11400 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up | Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 225 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 10 |
| Max Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Cache Size | 12 MB | 22 MB |
| Graphics | UHD 730 | Intel Graphics |
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1700 |
Dimension comparison
Overview
The Intel® Core™ i5-11400 and the Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 225 are both compelling options for users seeking strong performance in gaming and productivity. The i5-11400 is priced at $186.00, while the Ultra 5 comes in slightly lower at $179.12, making it about 3.9% cheaper. Both processors cater to different user needs, making it essential to understand their unique features and capabilities.
Performance
The Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 225 boasts a performance hybrid architecture with 10 cores (6 P-cores and 4 E-cores), which enhances its capability to handle multitasking and demanding workloads. It can reach speeds of up to 4.9 GHz, providing a robust performance edge for users engaged in gaming or content creation. In contrast, the Intel® Core™ i5-11400, with its 6 cores and a maximum frequency of 4.4 GHz, remains a solid performer, particularly for less intensive tasks. The Ultra 5's higher clock speed and additional cores make it a clear choice for users prioritizing multitasking and high-performance applications.
Graphics Capabilities
When it comes to integrated graphics, both processors provide adequate solutions for everyday use. The Intel® Core™ i5-11400 features the Intel UHD Graphics 730 controller, supporting up to three monitors, which can be beneficial for users who need multiple displays for productivity. The Ultra 5, however, also includes integrated Intel Graphics, which ensures smooth visual performance but does not specify the same level of multi-monitor support. Thus, while both processors offer decent graphical capabilities, the i5-11400 may be more suitable for users requiring extensive multi-display setups.
Cache Size
Cache size can significantly impact the processor's efficiency in handling data. The Intel® Core™ i5-11400 has a 12 MB L3 cache, which allows for quick data retrieval and improved system performance. On the other hand, the Ultra 5 has a larger 22 MB cache, which can enhance its ability to manage larger tasks and applications more efficiently. This difference in cache size suggests that the Ultra 5 may be better equipped to handle memory-intensive applications, making it appealing for gamers and content creators who often work with large files.
Compatibility
Compatibility with motherboards is an essential consideration when choosing a processor. The Intel® Core™ i5-11400 is compatible with Intel 500 series and select 400 series chipsets, ensuring a wide range of options for users looking to build or upgrade their systems. The Ultra 5 is compatible with Intel 800 series chipsets, which may limit options for some users but is still relevant for the latest builds. Depending on the existing hardware, this compatibility factor can influence the decision of which processor to choose.
Power Consumption
Both processors have a base power rating of 65W, meaning they are designed to be energy-efficient while delivering strong performance. This power efficiency can be particularly beneficial for users who want to maintain lower electricity costs and reduce heat output in their systems. As they both share this rating, users will not see a significant difference in power consumption between the two, making the choice more about performance and features rather than energy efficiency.
Price Comparison
The Intel® Core™ i5-11400 is priced at $186.00, while the Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 comes in at $179.12, which is approximately $6.88 less, or about 3.9% cheaper. This price difference, although not vast, may be a deciding factor for budget-conscious consumers. However, users must weigh this against the features and performance benefits offered by each processor, as the Ultra 5's advanced architecture may justify its price point for those seeking maximum efficiency and multitasking capability.
User Experience
The user experience can be influenced by several factors, including gaming performance, productivity, and overall system responsiveness. The Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 is designed with gamers and creators in mind, featuring advanced architecture that helps prioritize workloads effectively. Meanwhile, the Intel® Core™ i5-11400 is optimized for a balance of gaming and productivity, offering solid performance for everyday tasks. Depending on the primary use case, users may find that one processor aligns better with their specific needs, emphasizing the importance of considering what tasks they plan to perform.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Intel® Core™ i5-11400 and the Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 225 ultimately depends on your specific use case. If you require a processor with more cores and higher performance for multitasking, the Ultra 5, priced at $179.12, is the better option. However, if you need a reliable processor with solid graphics support and multi-monitor compatibility, the i5-11400 at $186.00 could be more suitable. Each processor has its strengths, so consider your needs and budget before making a decision.

