vsversusfinder

Intel® Core™ i9-14900KF New Gaming Desktop vs Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 Desktop Processor 285 24

Updated August 2026 — Intel® Core™ i9-14900KF New Gaming Desktop wins on price and clock speed, Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 Desktop Processor 285 24 wins on graphics and cooling.

The Intel® Core™ i9-14900KF offers better performance at a lower price, making it the more attractive option for gamers. However, the Ultra 9 provides integrated graphics and lower power consumption.

Why Intel® Core™ i9-14900KF New Gaming Desktop is better

Higher Clock Speed

i9-14900KF maxes out at 6.0 GHz compared to Ultra 9's 5.6 GHz.

Lower Price

i9-14900KF costs $439.79, while Ultra 9 costs $569.91.

More Power

i9-14900KF has a higher base power of 125W.

Why Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 Desktop Processor 285 24 is better

Integrated Graphics

Ultra 9 includes integrated Intel Graphics.

Lower Power Consumption

Ultra 9 has a base power of 65W.

Cooling Solution Included

Ultra 9 comes with Intel® Laminar RH2 cooling solution.

Overall score

Intel® Core™ i9-14900KF New Gaming Desktop
85
Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 Desktop Processor 285 24
75

Specifications

SpecIntel® Core™ i9-14900KF New Gaming DesktopIntel® Core™ Ultra 9 Desktop Processor 285 24
Cores24 (8 P + 16 E)24 (8 P + 16 E)
Max Clock6.0 GHz5.6 GHz
Base Power125W65W
Integrated GraphicsNoYes
Cooling SolutionNoneIncluded

Dimension comparison

Intel® Core™ i9-14900KF New Gaming DesktopIntel® Core™ Ultra 9 Desktop Processor 285 24

Overview

The Intel® Core™ i9-14900KF and the Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 Desktop Processor 285 are both high-performance CPUs designed for gamers and creators. The i9-14900KF is priced at $439.79, while the Ultra 9 is more expensive at $569.91, making it about 30% pricier. Both processors feature 24 cores, but they differ in clock speeds and integrated graphics options.

Performance

In terms of performance, the Intel® Core™ i9-14900KF boasts a leading max clock speed of up to 6.0 GHz, which is higher than the Ultra 9's maximum of 5.6 GHz. This difference can translate to smoother gameplay and higher frame rates, particularly in demanding gaming scenarios. Both processors feature a hybrid architecture with 8 P-cores and 16 E-cores, allowing for efficient task distribution, but the i9-14900KF edges out slightly in raw speed.

Power Consumption

Power consumption is another area where these processors diverge. The Intel® Core™ i9-14900KF has a higher base power of 125W, compared to the Ultra 9's 65W. This means that while the i9-14900KF may offer superior performance, it could also lead to higher energy costs over time. For users concerned about energy efficiency, the Ultra 9 could be a more appealing choice.

Integrated Graphics

One significant difference between the two processors is the inclusion of integrated graphics. The Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 comes with integrated Intel Graphics, which can be beneficial for users who may not have a discrete GPU. In contrast, the i9-14900KF does not include integrated graphics, necessitating a separate graphics card for any visual output. This feature could influence buyers who want a more straightforward setup.

Compatibility

When it comes to compatibility, the Intel® Core™ i9-14900KF is compatible with Intel 600-series and 700-series motherboards, while the Ultra 9 requires an Intel 800-series chipset-based motherboard. The i9-14900KF may offer broader options for users looking to upgrade an existing setup, as many current systems utilize the earlier chipsets. This could make it easier to find compatible components without needing a full system overhaul.

Cooling Solutions

Cooling solutions are essential for maintaining optimal performance, and here the two processors differ. The Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 includes the Intel® Laminar RH2 cooling solution in the box, which could save users the additional cost of purchasing a cooler separately. The i9-14900KF does not come with any thermal solution, meaning users will need to invest in quality cooling to maximize its performance. This added expense could sway consumers toward the Ultra 9.

Price Comparison

Price is a crucial factor in any purchase decision. The Intel® Core™ i9-14900KF is priced at $439.79, while the Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 costs $569.91, making the Ultra 9 approximately $130 more expensive. For users on a budget, the i9-14900KF represents a more economical choice without sacrificing too much in terms of core count or performance. If price is a primary concern, the i9-14900KF has a distinct advantage.

Which should you buy?

In conclusion, the choice between the Intel® Core™ i9-14900KF and the Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 largely depends on your specific needs. If you prioritize maximum clock speed and are looking for a more cost-effective option, the i9-14900KF is the clear winner. However, if you value integrated graphics and lower power consumption, the Ultra 9 may be worth the higher price. Ultimately, both processors cater to high-end users, but they do so with different strengths and weaknesses.