vsversusfinder

INTEL CPU Core i5-12400F / 6/12 / 2.5GHz / vs Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 235 14

Updated August 2026 — Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 235 14 leads on graphics and cores.

The Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 offers superior performance and architecture, making it the better choice for demanding tasks. However, the i5-12400F is more budget-friendly for everyday use.

Why INTEL CPU Core i5-12400F / 6/12 / 2.5GHz / is better

Price

i5-12400F is significantly cheaper.

Power Consumption

Both have the same power consumption.

Compatibility

i5-12400F works with 600 series motherboards.

Why Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 235 14 is better

Performance

Ultra 5 has higher clock speeds and more cores.

Architecture

Ultra 5 uses a hybrid architecture.

Integrated Graphics

Ultra 5 includes integrated Intel graphics.

Overall score

INTEL CPU Core i5-12400F / 6/12 / 2.5GHz /
75
Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 235 14
88

Specifications

SpecINTEL CPU Core i5-12400F / 6/12 / 2.5GHz /Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 235 14
ArchitectureTraditionalHybrid
Integrated GraphicsNoYes
Chipset Compatibility600 Series800 Series
PCIe Support5.0 & 4.05.0 & 4.0
Cache SizeN/A26 MB

Dimension comparison

INTEL CPU Core i5-12400F / 6/12 / 2.5GHz /Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 235 14

Overview

When comparing the INTEL CPU Core i5-12400F and the Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 235, the most significant difference lies in their architecture and core count. The i5-12400F features 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Ultra 5 boasts 14 cores, consisting of 6 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores. This difference in core count indicates that the Ultra 5 is designed for more demanding tasks and multitasking, potentially providing better performance in gaming and productivity applications.

Performance

The performance capabilities of these two processors differ greatly. The i5-12400F has a base clock speed of 2.5 GHz and can reach up to 4.4 GHz with turbo frequency, making it a solid choice for moderate gaming and productivity. In contrast, the Ultra 5 can achieve clock speeds of up to 5.0 GHz, benefiting from its hybrid architecture that optimally distributes workloads. This performance advantage makes the Ultra 5 better suited for intense gaming sessions and heavy multitasking.

Architecture

One of the key distinctions is the architecture each processor employs. The i5-12400F utilizes a traditional core configuration with no integrated graphics, while the Ultra 5 employs a performance hybrid architecture, combining both performance and efficiency cores. This allows the Ultra 5 to handle various workloads more effectively by prioritizing tasks based on their requirements. This could be vital for users who often run resource-heavy applications or engage in content creation.

Compatibility

In terms of motherboard compatibility, the i5-12400F works with 600 series chipset motherboards, while the Ultra 5 is compatible with 800 series chipset motherboards. This difference is important for users looking to upgrade their systems, as it dictates the type of motherboard required. Users with existing 600 series motherboards may find the i5-12400F a more convenient option, avoiding additional costs associated with a motherboard upgrade.

Pricing

The pricing for these two processors shows a substantial difference. The i5-12400F is priced at $149.00, whereas the Ultra 5 comes in at $266.21. This means the Ultra 5 is approximately 78% more expensive than the i5-12400F. For budget-conscious consumers or those with moderate computing needs, the i5-12400F presents a compelling choice without compromising on performance for everyday tasks.

Features

Both processors come with notable features that enhance their usability. The i5-12400F supports PCIe Gen 5.0 and 4.0, along with DDR5 and DDR4 memory, catering to modern gaming setups. On the other hand, the Ultra 5 also supports PCIe 5.0 and 4.0, but includes integrated Intel graphics, which can be beneficial for users who do not require a discrete graphics card. This feature makes the Ultra 5 more versatile for casual users or those in need of a quick graphics solution.

Power Consumption

Both processors have a base power consumption of 65W, indicating they are designed to be energy-efficient while still delivering robust performance. This similarity makes either choice a reasonable option for users concerned about power consumption and heat generation, particularly in compact builds or systems with limited cooling solutions.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the INTEL CPU Core i5-12400F and the Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 Desktop Processor 235 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for a cost-effective solution that handles everyday tasks well, the i5-12400F, priced at $149.00, is a solid choice. However, if you require higher performance for gaming or productivity, the Ultra 5, at $266.21, offers superior architecture and more cores, justifying its higher price. Your decision should align with the intended use of your computer and your budget constraints.