vsversusfinder

JBL Tune 720BT vs Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 Wireless Over-Ear

Updated July 2026 — JBL Tune 720BT wins on price and battery, Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 Wireless Over-Ear wins on sound and features.

The JBL Tune 720BT offers superior battery life and value, while the Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 excels in immersive sound and noise cancellation features.

Why JBL Tune 720BT is better

Battery Life

JBL offers 76 hours compared to Skullcandy's 60 hours.

Price

JBL is significantly cheaper at $59.95.

Sales Rank

JBL has a better sales rank of 96.

Why Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 Wireless Over-Ear is better

Sound Quality

Skullcandy features adjustable sensory bass.

Noise Cancelling

Skullcandy includes adjustable active noise cancelling.

Customization

Skullcandy offers personalized sound profiles.

Overall score

JBL Tune 720BT
85
Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 Wireless Over-Ear
78

Specifications

SpecJBL Tune 720BTSkullcandy Crusher ANC 2 Wireless Over-Ear
Battery Life76 hours60 hours
Price$59.95$149.99
Noise CancellingNoYes
Bluetooth5.3Unknown
WeightLightweightStandard

Dimension comparison

JBL Tune 720BTSkullcandy Crusher ANC 2 Wireless Over-Ear

Sound Quality

The JBL Tune 720BT offers renowned JBL Pure Bass sound, while the Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 features a patented multi-sensory bass technology. The JBL headphones are designed to deliver high-quality audio for a variety of listening experiences, powered by Bluetooth 5.3 technology. This enables a seamless connection to your devices, ensuring that you enjoy rich sound without the hassle of wires. Meanwhile, the Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 enhances your listening experience with adjustable sensory bass and customizable noise cancellation, allowing you to tailor your audio experience to your preferences. Both products provide exceptional sound quality, but the Crusher ANC 2 may appeal more to those who enjoy a more immersive bass experience.

Comfort and Design

In terms of comfort, both the JBL Tune 720BT and the Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 are designed for extended use. The JBL headphones are lightweight and foldable, making them convenient for travel, while the Skullcandy model emphasizes a snug fit with plush ear cushions for long listening sessions. The JBL Tune 720BT is particularly noted for its comfort even after hours of use, making it an excellent choice for those who plan to wear headphones for extended periods. However, the Crusher ANC 2 also promises comfort with its ergonomic design, making both options suitable for long hours of listening.

Battery Life

When it comes to battery life, the JBL Tune 720BT outshines the Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2. The JBL headphones boast an impressive 76 hours of battery life, meaning users can listen for days without needing to recharge. Additionally, they offer a quick charge feature, providing three hours of playtime with just five minutes of charging. In contrast, the Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 provides up to 60 hours of battery life with active noise cancelling off, and just 10 minutes of charging yields four hours of listening time. While both headphones offer substantial battery life, the JBL model stands out with its longer duration.

Features and Customization

Both headphones come equipped with various features for an enhanced listening experience, but they cater to different preferences. The JBL Tune 720BT allows users to customize their sound through the JBL Headphones App, which enables adjustments to the equalizer settings based on personal taste. Furthermore, it offers hands-free calls with Voice Aware technology, allowing users to hear their voice while talking. On the other hand, the Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 also provides a high level of customization through its Skull-iQ app, where users can create a personalized sound profile and adjust hearing modes. The inclusion of adjustable noise cancelling settings adds to its appeal, especially in noisy environments.

Connectivity

Both models excel in connectivity, featuring Bluetooth technology that allows for wireless streaming. The JBL Tune 720BT utilizes the latest Bluetooth 5.3 technology, ensuring a stable and high-quality connection with your devices. Additionally, it can seamlessly switch between devices, so you never miss a call while listening to music. Similarly, the Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 includes multipoint pairing, allowing users to connect to two devices simultaneously. This feature is particularly useful for those who frequently switch between devices, such as a phone and a laptop, making both options competitive in terms of connectivity.

Price Comparison

The JBL Tune 720BT is priced at $59.95, making it about 60% cheaper than the Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2, which retails for $149.99. The significant price difference might make the JBL headphones more appealing to budget-conscious consumers looking for quality sound without breaking the bank. Although the Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 offers advanced features like sensory bass and adjustable noise cancellation, the price increase may not be justifiable for all users. Therefore, those seeking value for money may gravitate towards the JBL offering.

Sales Rank

In terms of popularity, the JBL Tune 720BT has a sales rank of 96, indicating a strong demand in the market. This suggests that many users have found satisfaction and value in this product. Conversely, the Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 has a sales rank of 426, which, while still respectable, indicates that it may not be as widely purchased as the JBL model. The difference in sales ranks can influence potential buyers, as many consumers tend to trust products that are more popular and have received greater attention in the marketplace.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, choosing between the JBL Tune 720BT and the Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 hinges on personal preferences and priorities. If you seek an affordable option with exceptional battery life and a lightweight design, the JBL Tune 720BT is a compelling choice. However, if immersive sound with customizable noise cancellation is more critical to you, then the Skullcandy Crusher ANC 2 may be worth the investment. Each model excels in different areas, making either choice viable depending on your specific needs and listening habits.