KAMRUI Essenx E2 Mini PC, vs KAMRUI Pinova P1 Mini PC Computer
Updated April 2026 — KAMRUI Essenx E2 Mini PC, wins on graphics and performance, KAMRUI Pinova P1 Mini PC Computer wins on expandability and memory.
$329.99KAMRUI Essenx E2 Mini PC, 16GB RAM 512GB SSD Mini Computers,12th Alder Lake N97 (Beat N150,up to 3.6GHz) Micro PC, HDMI+DP1.4 Dual 4K UHD Small PC,Gigabit Ethernet,WiFi,BT,Home/Office Mini Desktop pc
KAMRUI
$319.99KAMRUI Pinova P1 Mini PC Computer, AMD Ryzen 4300U (Beats i3-10110U/3500U), 16GB RAM 256GB SSD, Mini Desktop Computer Support Triple 4K, USB-C, WiFi, Bluetooth, Ethernet for Business, Education, Home
KAMRUI
The KAMRUI Pinova P1 wins this comparison due to superior expandability and a lower price point. While the Essenx E2 offers a larger base SSD and a newer processor generation, the Pinova P1 supports up to 64GB of RAM and triple 4K displays, making it a more versatile long-term investment for multitasking users.
Why KAMRUI Essenx E2 Mini PC, is better
Larger base storage capacity
512GB SSD vs 256GB SSD
Newer processor generation
12th Alder Lake N97 vs Ryzen 4300U
Higher claimed GPU performance
GPU +78% vs N-series
Why KAMRUI Pinova P1 Mini PC Computer is better
Lower purchase price
$319.99 vs $329.99
Higher maximum RAM support
64GB vs 16GB
More display outputs
Triple 4K vs Dual 4K
More storage expansion slots
2x M.2 vs 1x M.2
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | KAMRUI Essenx E2 Mini PC, | KAMRUI Pinova P1 Mini PC Computer |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Intel Alder Lake N97 | AMD Ryzen 4300U |
| CPU Cores | 4 cores | 4 cores / 4 threads |
| CPU Clock Speed | 2.0GHz - 3.6GHz | 2.7GHz - 3.7GHz |
| Base RAM | 16GB DDR4 | 16GB DDR4 |
| Max RAM Support | 16GB | 64GB |
| Base Storage | 512GB SSD | 256GB SSD |
| Storage Slots | 1x M.2 | 2x M.2 |
| Max Storage Support | 2TB | 4TB |
| Display Support | Dual 4K | Triple 4K |
| Price | $329.99 | $319.99 |
Dimension comparison
Design and build quality
Both the KAMRUI Essenx E2 and the KAMRUI Pinova P1 are designed as compact mini PCs, intended to save desk space while providing desktop-level functionality. While specific physical dimensions are not provided in the data, both units feature small form factors typical of the mini PC category. The design philosophy focuses on utility and integration into home office or media center setups. Build quality expectations are similar given they share the same brand, though the internal layout differs to accommodate their respective expansion capabilities. Users should expect a plastic or metal chassis suitable for stationary placement behind a monitor or on a desk surface.
Processor and performance
The core processing power differs between the two models. The Essenx E2 utilizes the Intel Alder Lake N97 processor, which is marketed as a 2024 new release. This chip operates with a base frequency of 2.0GHz and can boost up to 3.6GHz across 4 cores. In contrast, the Pinova P1 is powered by the AMD Ryzen 4300U. This processor features a higher base clock of 2.7GHz and a boost up to 3.7GHz, also with 4 cores and 4 threads. Marketing data suggests the Ryzen chip offers approximately 10% better multi-threaded performance than typical entry-level N-series chips. However, the Intel N97 in the E2 claims a 35% performance increase over previous N-series models like the N100 or N95, indicating strong efficiency for its generation.
Memory and multitasking
Both systems ship with 16GB of DDR4 RAM out of the box, which is sufficient for general multitasking, web browsing, and office applications. However, the upgrade paths diverge significantly. The Essenx E2 has a single DDR4 SO-DIMM slot and supports a maximum capacity of 16GB. This means the memory is effectively fixed at the purchase configuration. The Pinova P1 offers much greater flexibility, supporting dual-channel DDR4-3200 when upgraded. Its maximum RAM capacity reaches 64GB using two 32GB modules. For users planning to run virtual machines or heavy multitasking workloads, the Pinova P1 provides a clear advantage in memory headroom.
Storage capabilities
Storage is another key differentiator. The Essenx E2 comes equipped with a 512GB M.2 SSD, which is double the base capacity of the Pinova P1's 256GB M.2 SSD. This gives the E2 an immediate advantage for users who need space right out of the box without opening the case. However, the Pinova P1 compensates with superior expansion options. It features two M.2 2280 slots compared to the single slot in the E2. While the E2 supports up to 2TB on its single slot, the P1 supports a total storage capacity of up to 4TB across its two slots. This makes the P1 more suitable for users building a media library or requiring extensive local backup.
Display and connectivity
Visual output capabilities are critical for mini PCs used as workstations or media hubs. The KAMRUI E2 supports UHD Graphics capable of driving dual 4K screens at 60Hz. This is adequate for most dual-monitor office setups. The Pinova P1 extends this capability further by supporting triple 4K displays. This additional output allows for more complex workstation configurations, such as trading setups or multi-window productivity environments, without requiring additional hardware adapters. Both units utilize UHD graphics architectures suitable for daily tasks, email, and document editing, though neither is designed for high-end gaming.
Expandability and upgrades
Long-term usability often depends on how well a system can grow with user needs. The Pinova P1 is the superior choice for expandability. With two M.2 slots and support for up to 64GB of RAM, it allows for significant internal upgrades over time. The Essenx E2 is more limited, with only one RAM slot capped at 16GB and one storage slot capped at 2TB. While the E2's base specs are higher in storage, the P1's ceiling is much higher. Users who anticipate needing more memory or storage in the future should prioritize the P1 to avoid replacing the unit entirely when requirements exceed the E2's limits.
Price and value
When comparing cost, the KAMRUI Pinova P1 is priced at $319.99, while the Essenx E2 is listed at $329.99. The P1 is $10 cheaper despite offering higher expansion limits and triple display support. The E2 justifies its slightly higher price with a larger 512GB SSD and a newer generation Intel processor. For budget-conscious buyers, the P1 offers better raw value due to the lower entry price and higher upgrade potential. However, users who value immediate storage capacity over future expandability might find the extra $10 for the E2 worthwhile to avoid buying an immediate SSD upgrade.
Which one should you buy?
Choosing between these two mini PCs depends on your specific workflow requirements. If you need a system ready for heavy multitasking with potential for future RAM upgrades, the KAMRUI Pinova P1 is the better choice. Its support for 64GB of RAM and triple 4K displays makes it more versatile for power users. Conversely, if you prefer a higher base storage capacity and a newer CPU generation without plans to upgrade internal components, the KAMRUI Essenx E2 is a solid option. Ultimately, the Pinova P1 wins on overall flexibility and price, making it the recommended pick for most users seeking a long-term desktop solution.