vsversusfinder

Kenmore CU7005 Litening 24V Cordless Upright vs Shark Rocket Ultra-Light Corded Bagless Vacuum for

Updated July 2026 — Kenmore CU7005 Litening 24V Cordless Upright leads on rank and price.

The Kenmore CU7005 excels in runtime and advanced features, while the Shark Rocket offers lightweight convenience and affordability.

Why Kenmore CU7005 Litening 24V Cordless Upright is better

Runtime

Kenmore offers up to 80 minutes of cordless operation.

Suction Power

Kenmore has 4X suction power compared to Shark.

Filtration

Kenmore features a HEPA filtration system.

Why Shark Rocket Ultra-Light Corded Bagless Vacuum for is better

Price

Shark is significantly cheaper at $109.

Weight

Shark weighs under 9 lbs, making it ultra-light.

Maneuverability

Shark's swivel steering enhances control.

Overall score

Kenmore CU7005 Litening 24V Cordless Upright
85
Shark Rocket Ultra-Light Corded Bagless Vacuum for
72

Specifications

SpecKenmore CU7005 Litening 24V Cordless UprightShark Rocket Ultra-Light Corded Bagless Vacuum for
Power TypeCordlessCorded
HEPA FilterYesNo
Weight12 lbs9 lbs
Runtime80 minsN/A
AccessoriesHair EliminatorUpholstery Tool

Dimension comparison

Kenmore CU7005 Litening 24V Cordless UprightShark Rocket Ultra-Light Corded Bagless Vacuum for

Overview of the Kenmore CU7005 and Shark Rocket

The Kenmore CU7005 Litening is a cordless vacuum priced at $328.99, while the Shark Rocket Ultra-Light is a corded vacuum retailing for $109.00. This substantial price difference reflects the design and functionality of each model. The Kenmore model offers the advantage of cordless operation with a runtime of up to 80 minutes, making it ideal for extensive cleaning tasks. In contrast, the Shark vacuum excels in lightweight portability and immediate power, providing consistent suction without the need for recharging.

Design and Build Quality

The Kenmore CU7005 features a sleek design that emphasizes functionality with its Lift-Up Technology, allowing it to clean difficult areas like stairs easily. Weighing significantly more than the Shark Rocket, the Kenmore's design is meant for comprehensive cleaning, though it may be less maneuverable in tight spaces. The Shark Rocket, on the other hand, weighs under 9 pounds, making it an ultra-lightweight option that converts into a handheld vacuum. This versatility in design caters to those who need a vacuum that can adapt to various cleaning situations without sacrificing ease of use.

Cleaning Performance

The Kenmore CU7005 boasts an impressive 4X suction power, which significantly enhances its cleaning capabilities on both carpets and hard floors. Equipped with a HEPA filtration system, it captures 99.97% of dust and pet dander, making it a strong contender for households with allergies. Conversely, the Shark Rocket promises ultra-powerful performance on both carpet and hard floors as well, highlighting its ability to deep clean without losing suction. While both vacuums are effective, the Kenmore offers more advanced features for pet owners and those needing deep cleaning.

Runtime and Convenience

The Kenmore CU7005's cordless design provides up to 80 minutes of runtime, supported by two included batteries. This feature allows users the freedom to clean larger areas without the constraints of a power cord. In contrast, the Shark Rocket is a corded vacuum, which means it does not have a runtime limitation but requires proximity to an outlet. While the Shark offers an “always on” cleaning experience, the Kenmore's cordless freedom caters to those who prefer a more mobile cleaning approach without interruptions.

Accessories and Usability

The Kenmore CU7005 comes equipped with a unique Hair Eliminator Nozzle, which prevents hair from wrapping around the brushroll, ensuring a tangle-free experience. This is particularly beneficial for pet owners. The vacuum also features an LED display that enhances usability by providing real-time information about battery life. On the other hand, the Shark Rocket includes essential tools such as an upholstery tool and a crevice tool, enhancing its versatility for various cleaning tasks. Both models focus on usability but cater to different needs with their respective accessories.

Price Comparison

At $328.99, the Kenmore CU7005 is significantly more expensive than the Shark Rocket, which is priced at $109.00. This price difference of approximately 66% reflects the advanced features and longer runtime of the Kenmore model. While the Shark Rocket is about 17% cheaper than its average price over the past 90 days ($132.83), it offers a budget-friendly option for consumers looking for effective cleaning without breaking the bank. The pricing strategy of each model targets different segments of the market, with the Kenmore aimed at consumers seeking premium features.

Customer Reception and Sales Rank

The Kenmore CU7005 has a sales rank of 168,470, indicating that while it is popular, it may not be as widely purchased as the Shark Rocket, which has an impressive sales rank of 648. This suggests that customers may favor the Shark Rocket for its value and performance at a lower price point. The differences in sales rank highlight consumer preferences, with many opting for the Shark’s combination of lightweight design and affordability.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the Kenmore CU7005 and the Shark Rocket ultimately depends on your specific cleaning needs and budget. If you require a vacuum with extensive runtime, powerful suction, and advanced features like a HEPA filter for allergy management, the Kenmore CU7005 is the ideal choice. However, if you are looking for a lightweight, versatile, and budget-friendly vacuum that excels in everyday cleaning tasks, the Shark Rocket is a strong contender. Weighing the features against the price will guide you to the best option for your home.