Kenmore CU7005 Litening 24V Cordless Upright vs Shark ZU62 Navigator Zero-M Self-Cleaning
Updated August 2026 — Kenmore CU7005 Litening 24V Cordless Upright wins on runtime and suction, Shark ZU62 Navigator Zero-M Self-Cleaning wins on price and capacity.
The Kenmore CU7005 offers superior suction power and runtime, making it ideal for thorough cleaning, while the Shark ZU62 is a more budget-friendly option with effective pet hair removal features.
Why Kenmore CU7005 Litening 24V Cordless Upright is better
Suction Power
Kenmore has 4X suction power compared to standard cordless vacuums.
Runtime
Kenmore offers up to 80 minutes of cordless cleaning.
Filtration
Kenmore captures 99.97% of allergens with its HEPA filter.
Why Shark ZU62 Navigator Zero-M Self-Cleaning is better
Price
Shark is $47.88 cheaper than Kenmore.
Maintenance
Shark features self-cleaning brush roll for easier upkeep.
Dust Cup
Shark has a larger dust cup capacity for longer cleaning sessions.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Kenmore CU7005 Litening 24V Cordless Upright | Shark ZU62 Navigator Zero-M Self-Cleaning |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Kenmore | Shark |
| Model | CU7005 | ZU62 |
| Power | 24V | N/A |
| HEPA Filter | Yes | Yes |
| Self-Cleaning | No | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Shark ZU62 Navigator Zero-M Self-Cleaning Brushroll Pet Pro Upright Vacuum is about 15% cheaper than the Kenmore CU7005 Litening 24V Cordless Upright Vacuum. The Kenmore is priced at $328.99, while the Shark comes in at $281.11. This price difference might be a key consideration for budget-conscious buyers looking for effective cleaning solutions. Both vacuums offer unique features that justify their respective price points, but for those focused on cost, the Shark presents a more economical choice without sacrificing performance.
Design and Usability
In terms of design and usability, both vacuums cater to ease of use, but they each have distinct advantages. The Kenmore CU7005 features Lift-Up Technology, allowing for effortless cleaning of stairs and above-floor surfaces. Its lightweight design enhances portability, making it user-friendly for various cleaning tasks. Conversely, the Shark ZU62's lightweight design and 3XL capacity dust cup allow for longer cleaning sessions with fewer interruptions. The self-cleaning brush roll of the Shark ensures that pet hair does not clog the vacuum, simplifying maintenance. Each design offers unique benefits tailored to different user needs.
Suction Power and Cleaning Performance
When it comes to suction power and cleaning performance, the Kenmore CU7005 boasts an impressive four times the suction of standard cordless stick vacuums, providing exceptional cleaning capabilities. The inclusion of a HEPA filtration system further enhances its ability to capture 99.97% of dust and pet dander, making it particularly effective for allergy sufferers. On the other hand, the Shark ZU62 is designed for deep cleaning and excels in removing stubborn pet hair thanks to its powerful suction and the innovative Zero-M self-cleaning brush roll. This technology ensures that the brush roll maintains optimal cleaning efficiency without hair wrap, making it ideal for pet owners.
Runtime and Convenience
The Kenmore CU7005 offers remarkable runtime with up to 80 minutes of cordless cleaning, supported by two included batteries. This extended runtime allows for a whole-home clean without the hassle of recharging frequently. In contrast, the Shark ZU62 does not highlight a specific runtime but emphasizes its large dust cup capacity, allowing for longer cleaning sessions without the need to stop and empty the cup. While the Kenmore excels in runtime, the Shark focuses on continuous cleaning convenience, catering to different preferences in vacuum usage.
Filtration Systems
Both vacuums feature advanced filtration systems, but they approach allergen management differently. The Kenmore CU7005 comes equipped with a HEPA filtration system that captures a significant amount of allergens, providing a sealed environment that prevents dust and pet dander from escaping back into the air. The Shark ZU62 also utilizes a HEPA filter along with Anti-Allergen Complete Seal Technology, which ensures that dust and allergens are trapped inside the vacuum. While both vacuums are effective at managing allergens, the Kenmore's slightly higher capture rate of 99.97% offers a marginal advantage for those particularly sensitive to allergens.
Maintenance and Cleaning Features
Maintenance is an essential aspect of any vacuum cleaner, and both models address this concern effectively. The Kenmore CU7005 features a hair eliminator nozzle that prevents hair from wrapping around the brush roll, ensuring a tangle-free cleaning experience. This unique design minimizes the need for manual cleaning of the brush roll. Meanwhile, the Shark ZU62’s Zero-M self-cleaning technology actively removes hair from the brush roll during operation, significantly reducing maintenance efforts. Both vacuums excel in maintenance features, but the Shark's self-cleaning function may appeal more to pet owners who frequently deal with hair.
Portability and Weight
Portability is a crucial factor for many users, and both vacuums are designed to be lightweight and easy to maneuver. The Kenmore CU7005 is crafted for effortless lifting, making it particularly suitable for cleaning stairs and hard-to-reach areas. Its lightweight design enhances its usability across various surfaces. Similarly, the Shark ZU62 is designed for easy maneuverability and portability, allowing users to navigate around furniture and tight spaces with ease. While both vacuums are designed for convenience, the Kenmore's Lift-Up Technology provides a slight edge for users needing to clean above-floor surfaces.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Kenmore CU7005 and the Shark ZU62 ultimately depends on individual cleaning needs and preferences. If you prioritize extended runtime, superior suction power, and advanced HEPA filtration, the Kenmore CU7005 may be the better option for you, despite its higher price. However, if you're looking for a more budget-friendly vacuum that excels in pet hair removal and offers convenient maintenance features, the Shark ZU62 stands out as an excellent choice. Both vacuums have their strengths, but your specific requirements will dictate the best fit for your home.

