KMFurnila Mini Fridge with Freezer, 3.2 Cu.Ft Mini vs Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star
Updated July 2026 — KMFurnila Mini Fridge with Freezer, 3.2 Cu.Ft Mini wins on height and capacity, Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star wins on depth and width.
The KMFurnila Mini Fridge offers more features and storage capacity, making it the better choice for versatile needs.
Why KMFurnila Mini Fridge with Freezer, 3.2 Cu.Ft Mini is better
Storage Capacity
KMFurnila has 3.2 cu.ft compared to Midea's 1.6 cu.ft.
Cooling Performance
KMFurnila features dual-zone cooling.
Noise Level
KMFurnila operates at 38dB, quieter than Midea's 42dB.
Why Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star is better
Price
Midea is $122.99, cheaper than KMFurnila at $125.95.
Energy Efficiency
Midea is Energy Star certified.
Compact Size
Midea is more compact, ideal for tight spaces.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | KMFurnila Mini Fridge with Freezer, 3.2 Cu.Ft Mini | Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge, 1.6 Cu.ft Energy Star |
|---|---|---|
| Cooling Zones | Dual | Single |
| Noise Level | 38dB | <42dB |
| Energy Star | No | Yes |
| Adjustable Temp | 5 settings | Mechanical |
| Price | $125.95 | $122.99 |
Dimension comparison
Design and Size Comparison
When it comes to design and size, the KMFurnila Mini Fridge with Freezer is slightly larger and offers more storage capacity than the Midea WHS-65LB1 Mini Fridge. The KMFurnila measures 17.7" deep, 17.5" wide, and 31.5" high, providing a total capacity of 3.2 cubic feet. In contrast, the Midea is more compact at 18.6" deep, 17.7" wide, and 19.4" high, with a capacity of just 1.6 cubic feet. This means that the KMFurnila can hold a larger quantity of items, making it suitable for those who need more space for beverages and snacks. However, the Midea's smaller size makes it an excellent choice for tight areas like small dorm rooms or offices, where every inch counts.
Cooling Performance
The KMFurnila Mini Fridge with Freezer offers dual-zone cooling, featuring a separate freezer compartment with a temperature range of 23-35°F and a refrigerator section that maintains temperatures from 33.8-44°F. This setup allows for organized storage of both frozen and fresh goods. On the other hand, the Midea WHS-65LB1 features a single cooling zone with temperature settings adjustable between 28.4°F and 35.6°F. While the Midea provides sufficient cooling for beverages and snacks, the KMFurnila's dual-zone feature makes it more versatile for users who may want to store frozen items alongside their groceries.
Noise Levels
In terms of noise levels, both mini fridges boast quiet operations, but the KMFurnila is notably quieter. It operates at just 38dB, which is quieter than a library whisper, making it suitable for bedrooms and study areas. The Midea WHS-65LB1 has a noise level of less than 42dB, which is also relatively quiet but not as silent as the KMFurnila. For users sensitive to noise, the KMFurnila provides a more peaceful experience, especially during nighttime or quiet hours.
Energy Efficiency
Both the KMFurnila and Midea mini fridges are designed with energy efficiency in mind. The Midea WHS-65LB1 is Energy Star certified, consuming only 207 kWh per year, which can contribute to lower electricity bills over time. The KMFurnila does not specify its energy consumption in the features but is marketed as energy-saving. Given that the Midea is priced at $122.99, which is about 17% cheaper than the KMFurnila at $125.95, it may offer better overall value in terms of energy efficiency and upfront cost.
Versatility and Features
The KMFurnila Mini Fridge with Freezer comes with 5 adjustable temperature settings, allowing for precise control over the cooling environment. This feature is particularly useful for preserving a variety of items, from beverages to perishable foods. In comparison, the Midea WHS-65LB1 has a basic mechanical adjustable thermostat, which provides fewer options for customization. Additionally, the KMFurnila includes a dual-zone feature for organized storage of frozen and fresh items, while the Midea is more straightforward with its single compartment. For users seeking versatility in their cooling options, the KMFurnila stands out as the better choice.
Storage Solutions
The storage solutions offered by both mini fridges cater to different needs. The KMFurnila boasts a thoughtful layout that includes a 0.3 cubic feet freezer and a larger fridge section, ideal for a wide range of items, including snacks, drinks, and leftovers. The Midea WHS-65LB1 features a 2L bottle rack that accommodates larger bottles, which may be beneficial for those who frequently store drinks. However, it lacks the freezer compartment. Users with diverse storage needs may find the KMFurnila's layout more accommodating, while those primarily storing beverages might prefer the Midea for its simplicity.
Price Comparison
While both mini fridges are competitively priced, the Midea WHS-65LB1 is slightly more affordable at $122.99 compared to the KMFurnila Mini Fridge with Freezer, which retails for $125.95. This positions the Midea as a more budget-friendly option, particularly for students or individuals seeking essential refrigeration without the additional features of a freezer. However, the KMFurnila's enhanced features, such as its larger capacity and quieter operation, may justify the extra cost for some users.
Which should you buy?
In concluding this comparison, the choice between the KMFurnila Mini Fridge with Freezer and the Midea WHS-65LB1 largely depends on your specific needs. If you require more storage capacity, versatile cooling options, and quieter operation, the KMFurnila is the better pick. However, if you are looking for a more budget-friendly option that still provides reliable cooling for basic needs, the Midea is an excellent choice. Ultimately, consider what features matter most to you—capacity, cooling performance, noise levels, or price—before making your decision.

