vsversusfinder

Laowa vs Tamron

Updated July 2026 — Laowa wins on weight and fov, Tamron wins on length and max mag.

Winner

The Laowa 12mm f/2.8 offers superior optical performance for landscape photography, while the Tamron 24mm f/2.8 is a versatile and budget-friendly option.

Why Laowa is better

Optical Quality

Laowa has virtually zero distortion and a wider field of view.

Low Light Performance

Laowa's fast f/2.8 aperture excels in low-light conditions.

Specialization

Laowa is tailored for landscape and architectural photography.

Why Tamron is better

Price

Tamron is significantly cheaper at $199.

Compactness

Tamron is lighter and more portable.

Versatility

Tamron serves as a general-purpose lens.

Overall score

Laowa
85
Tamron
75

Specifications

SpecLaowaTamron
BrandLAOWATamron
Price$699.00$199.00
Field of View122°84°
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Object Dist.14mm4.7in
Weight377g215g

Dimension comparison

LaowaTamron

Overview of the Laowa 12mm f/2.8 Lite Zero-D and Tamron 24mm F/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2

When it comes to wide-angle lenses, the Laowa 12mm f/2.8 Lite Zero-D and the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2 present two compelling options for photographers. The Laowa lens is priced at $699.00, while the Tamron lens is significantly more budget-friendly at $199.00, making it about 71% cheaper than its counterpart. This price difference may influence your decision based on your photographic needs and budget constraints.

Design and Build Quality

The Laowa 12mm f/2.8 features a lightweight design at just 377g, making it highly portable without sacrificing performance. In contrast, the Tamron 24mm lens weighs only 7.6oz, or approximately 215g, and has a length of 2.5 inches, making it even more compact. Both lenses are designed for easy handling, with the Laowa offering a robust construction suitable for full-frame mirrorless cameras and the Tamron emphasizing a compact and lightweight profile ideal for all-day shooting adventures.

Optical Performance

The Laowa 12mm f/2.8 boasts an impressive 122° field of view with virtually zero distortion, which is particularly beneficial for landscape and architectural photography. It excels in low-light conditions due to its fast f/2.8 maximum aperture, allowing for creative depth control. On the other hand, the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 provides a 1:2 maximum magnification ratio, enabling detailed macro-style shots. While both lenses perform well, the Laowa lens is tailored for expansive scenery, while the Tamron lens shines in versatility, suitable for both landscapes and urban scenes.

Close-Up Photography Capabilities

The Tamron 24mm lens offers a minimum object distance of just 4.7 inches, which allows for unique close-up shots. This feature is enhanced by its f/2.8 aperture that delivers beautiful bokeh, making it ideal for capturing intricate details. In comparison, while the Laowa 12mm also allows for close-up photography with a close focusing distance of 14mm, it is primarily designed for wider perspectives. Therefore, if macro photography is a priority, the Tamron lens would be the more suitable choice.

Versatility and Shooting Styles

The Laowa 12mm lens is specifically designed for full-frame mirrorless cameras and is perfect for landscape and architectural photography. Its ultra-wide angle and low distortion make it a specialized tool for those genres. Conversely, the Tamron 24mm lens serves as a general-purpose wide-angle lens, making it adaptable for a variety of shooting styles, including candid snapshots. Its versatility at a lower price point makes it an appealing option for photographers who prefer a single lens for multiple scenarios.

Durability and Weather Resistance

The Tamron 24mm lens includes moisture-resistant construction and a dirt-resistant fluorine coating, allowing photographers to confidently shoot in varying weather conditions. Meanwhile, the Laowa 12mm does not explicitly mention weather resistance features, focusing instead on its lightweight design and performance. For outdoor photographers who frequently work in unpredictable environments, the Tamron's durability could be a significant advantage.

Price Point Comparison

With the Laowa 12mm priced at $699.00 and the Tamron 24mm at $199.00, the difference is stark—about $500. This price disparity reflects the specialized nature of the Laowa lens, which may be worth the investment for serious landscape photographers. However, the Tamron lens offers excellent value for those looking for a quality lens at a fraction of the price, making it an attractive option for hobbyists and casual photographers alike.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the Laowa 12mm f/2.8 Lite Zero-D and the Tamron 24mm F/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2 comes down to your specific photography needs and budget. If you prioritize low distortion and expansive landscapes, the Laowa lens is an exceptional choice despite its higher price. Conversely, if versatility, compactness, and affordability are your main concerns, the Tamron lens presents a compelling case with its broad applicability across different photography styles. Consider how you plan to use the lens to determine which option aligns best with your creative vision.