Lasko Cyclone Pedestal Fan, Adjustable Height, vs Vornado 683DC Energy Smart Medium Pedestal Air
Updated August 2026 — Lasko Cyclone Pedestal Fan, Adjustable Height, wins on oscillation and height, Vornado 683DC Energy Smart Medium Pedestal Air wins on airflow and power usage.
The Lasko Cyclone offers great value with its features and lower price, while the Vornado excels in energy efficiency and airflow technology.
Why Lasko Cyclone Pedestal Fan, Adjustable Height, is better
Price
Lasko is significantly cheaper at $54.84.
Remote Control
Lasko includes a multi-function remote control.
Height Range
Lasko has a taller height adjustment range.
Why Vornado 683DC Energy Smart Medium Pedestal Air is better
Energy Efficiency
Vornado uses up to 80% less energy.
Airflow Distance
Vornado moves air up to 80 feet.
Variable Speed
Vornado offers precise variable speed control.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Lasko Cyclone Pedestal Fan, Adjustable Height, | Vornado 683DC Energy Smart Medium Pedestal Air |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $54.84 | $99.99 |
| Speed Control | 3 speeds | Variable |
| Timer | 4-hour | None |
| Motor Type | AC | DC |
| Bestseller Rank | 32144 | 35004 |
Dimension comparison
Design and Build Quality
When it comes to design and build quality, both the Lasko Cyclone Pedestal Fan and the Vornado 683DC are engineered for performance but offer distinct aesthetics and functionality. The Lasko Cyclone features an elegant grill with a sleek, space-saving design that blends well with most home decor. In contrast, the Vornado 683DC boasts a modern appearance with its signature Vortex technology and streamlined structure. Both fans provide adjustable height options, with Lasko allowing adjustments from 41" to 53.5", while Vornado adjusts from 32" to 38". The Lasko's height range is about 15 inches taller at its maximum setting, making it potentially more versatile for different room sizes.
Airflow and Circulation
The airflow capabilities of both fans are impressive, but they approach air circulation differently. The Lasko Cyclone offers three speed settings, allowing users to customize airflow according to their needs. This fan is designed to effectively cool larger spaces, as indicated by its widespread oscillation feature, which covers 90 degrees. On the other hand, the Vornado 683DC utilizes advanced Vortex technology, moving air up to 80 feet. This model features variable speed control, providing a more customized airflow experience ranging from a gentle breeze to maximum circulation. The Vornado's ability to reach further distances may be beneficial for larger rooms, making it ideal for those who prioritize extensive air movement.
Energy Efficiency
Energy efficiency is a significant selling point for the Vornado 683DC, which features a brushless DC motor that uses up to 80% less energy than traditional AC fans. In contrast, the Lasko Cyclone does not highlight specific energy-saving features in its specifications. The Vornado's energy-efficient design not only contributes to its performance but also minimizes energy bills, making it a suitable choice for users seeking long-term savings. With the Vornado priced at $99.99 and the Lasko at $54.84, the investment in the Vornado could be justified by its lower energy consumption over time.
Features and Convenience
Both fans come packed with features designed to enhance user convenience. The Lasko Cyclone is equipped with a multi-function remote control, allowing users to operate the fan from a distance, set timers, and adjust speeds without getting up. It also includes a 4-hour auto-off timer, perfect for those who want a cooling breeze while they sleep. Meanwhile, the Vornado 683DC offers front-mounted variable speed controls for easy adjustments and boasts tool-free assembly, making setup quick and hassle-free. While both fans prioritize convenience, the inclusion of the auto-off timer in the Lasko may appeal to users who prefer a set-and-forget option.
Noise Levels
Both fans are designed to operate quietly, but the technologies behind their performance may influence noise levels. The Lasko Cyclone is engineered for quiet operation, making it suitable for bedrooms and quiet spaces. The Vornado 683DC also maintains whisper-quiet operation while delivering strong airflow, making it ideal for both daytime cooling and nighttime use. While specific decibel ratings are not provided, the emphasis on quiet functioning in both models suggests that users can expect minimal disruption while enjoying refreshing airflow, regardless of their choice.
Price Comparison
In terms of pricing, the Lasko Cyclone is currently priced at $54.84, making it about 45% cheaper than the Vornado 683DC, which retails for $99.99. This significant price gap may attract budget-conscious consumers looking for efficient cooling solutions without breaking the bank. However, the Vornado's higher price may be justified by its advanced energy efficiency and performance features. Consumers need to weigh the cost against the specific benefits each fan offers to determine the best value for their needs.
Brand Reputation and Reliability
Both Lasko and Vornado are reputable brands in the fan market, each with its unique strengths. Lasko is known for its reliable and affordable cooling solutions, as indicated by its bestseller rank of 32,144. Conversely, Vornado's emphasis on advanced technology and energy efficiency has earned it a loyal customer base, as seen in its comparable bestseller rank of 35,004. While both brands deliver quality products, consumers may lean toward Lasko for budget-friendly options or Vornado for innovative features and energy savings.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Lasko Cyclone Pedestal Fan and the Vornado 683DC ultimately depends on individual needs and preferences. If you prioritize budget-friendliness and features like remote control and automatic timers, the Lasko Cyclone may be the better choice at $54.84. However, if energy efficiency, advanced airflow technology, and longer-reaching circulation are more critical to you, the Vornado 683DC, priced at $99.99, may justify the investment. Each fan offers unique advantages, making them both strong contenders in the pedestal fan category.

