Lian Li A3-mATX-WD-26.3L Micro Form vs JONSBO D32 PRO Micro-ATX PC Case,High
Updated April 2026 — Lian Li A3-mATX-WD-26.3L Micro Form wins on storage and price, JONSBO D32 PRO Micro-ATX PC Case,High wins on cooling and gpu support.
$72.99JONSBO D32 PRO Micro-ATX PC Case,High Compatibility Mini Desktop Case,A/B Mode for MB, Support MATX Back-Connect/BTF MB,365mm GPU/240AIO/163mm Air Cooler,ATX/SFX PSU, USB3.2 PC Gaming case,Black
Jonsbo
$89.99Lian Li A3-mATX-WD-26.3L Micro Form Factor Chassis-No Fans Included-Supports 360mm AIO-Modularity Design-for M-ATX, ITX Motherboard-DAN Cases Collaboration-Wood Front Panel-Black (A3X-WD)
Lian Li
Product B offers superior hardware compatibility with support for larger graphics cards and radiators, justified by its higher price point. Product A provides a budget-friendly option with adequate specifications for standard micro-ATX builds and defined drive bay capacity.
Why Lian Li A3-mATX-WD-26.3L Micro Form is better
Lower retail price
Product A costs $72.99 compared to Product B at $89.99
Defined drive bay capacity
Product A supports up to 4x 2.5-inch and 2x 3.5-inch drives
Specified air cooler clearance
Product A supports air coolers up to 163mm height
Why JONSBO D32 PRO Micro-ATX PC Case,High is better
Larger graphics card support
Product B accommodates GPUs up to 415mm versus 365mm
Superior radiator capacity
Product B supports 360mm radiators compared to 240mm
Higher fan mounting capacity
Product B supports up to 10 x 120mm fans
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Lian Li A3-mATX-WD-26.3L Micro Form | JONSBO D32 PRO Micro-ATX PC Case,High |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $72.99 | $89.99 |
| Case Volume | 24L | 26.3L |
| Max GPU Length | 365mm | 415mm |
| Radiator Support | 240mm AIO | 360mm |
| Air Cooler Height | 163mm | null |
| Drive Bays | 4x 2.5-inch, 2x 3.5-inch | null |
| PSU Compatibility | ATX/SFX-LSFX | ATX/SFX/SFX-L |
| Front Material | null | Walnut wood |
Dimension comparison
Design and Build Quality
Product A features a tempered side glass panel designed to showcase internal hardware components. The design includes an adjustable motherboard cable management cover intended to block visible complex wires for a cleaner aesthetic. Product B utilizes high airflow steel mesh panels on the side and top to optimize airflow. It distinguishes itself with a walnut wood front panel and a modular structure, aiming for a compact and minimalist PC build appearance. Both cases focus on visual presentation, though Product B emphasizes material variety with wood and steel mesh.
Case Volume and Dimensions
The physical footprint differs between the two units. Product A is listed with a volume of 24L in its feature description, though the title references 26.3L. Its dimensions are specified as D396×W207×H314mm including feet. Product B explicitly states a compact 26.3L design in its features. This slight difference in volume impacts internal component spacing. Product B offers a marginally larger internal space, which can assist with cable management and airflow distribution within the micro-ATX form factor constraint.
Motherboard Compatibility
Both cases target the micro-ATX market segment. Product A supports MINI-ITX and MICRO-ATX standard motherboards. It also features an A/B mode switch to accommodate BTF (back-connect) motherboards, requiring the case to be switched to B mode for this specific hardware. Product B accommodates mATX and ITX motherboards with 4 expansion slots. The ability to switch modes in Product A provides flexibility for newer motherboard standards, while Product B maintains standard compatibility for traditional layouts.
Graphics Card Support
Graphics card clearance is a critical specification for gaming builds. Product A supports a maximum GPU length of 365mm. It includes a detachable PCI-E position with an unobstructed opening design to facilitate easier insertion of large graphics cards. Product B offers significantly more clearance, accommodating GPUs up to 415mm. This 50mm difference allows Product B to house higher-end graphics cards that often require larger cooling solutions, making it more suitable for performance-heavy configurations.
Cooling and Airflow
Thermal management capabilities vary between the two cases. Product A supports 240mm AIO liquid coolers. Product B is capable of housing a 360mm radiator, providing better potential for cooling high-TDP components. Additionally, Product B supports up to 10 x 120mm fans, whereas Product A does not specify a total fan count. Product B also features steel mesh panels designed for optimal airflow, making it potentially more effective for high-temperature hardware setups compared to the glass-heavy design of Product A.
Storage and Drive Bays
Storage flexibility is defined clearly in Product A. It supports up to four 2.5-inch drives and up to two 3.5-inch drives, though the 3.5-inch mounts are shared with two of the 2.5-inch mounts. Product B does not specify drive bay counts in the provided data. For users requiring multiple hard drives or SSDs, Product A offers a confirmed configuration layout. The shared mounting system in Product A allows for some customization depending on whether the user prioritizes SSDs or traditional HDDs.
Power Supply Options
Both cases offer flexibility regarding power supply units. Product A is compatible with ATX, SFX, and SFX-L PSUs, noting an exception for 16A plugs. Product B is compatible with ATX, SFX, SFX-L, and specific LIAN LI EDGE power supplies. Product B also offers flexible PSU installation with front or side orientation options to enhance clearance and cable management. This orientation flexibility in Product B can help optimize internal space usage depending on the chosen component layout.
Price and Overall Value
Product A is priced at $72.99, positioning it as a budget-friendly option in the micro-ATX category. Product B is priced at $89.99, reflecting its premium materials like the walnut wood panel and expanded cooling support. While Product A offers better value for standard builds with defined storage options, Product B justifies the higher cost with superior hardware compatibility limits. Users prioritizing maximum GPU and radiator size should consider Product B, while cost-conscious builders may prefer Product A.